Agree with the overall story, but believe that Lincoln would've kept the union strong and free, extending that golden age if he had lived. That said, the cabal killed Lincoln precisely because that was his plan. After the victory, he said it was right to begin playing Dixie again, symbolizing a much kinder reunification than what actually happened. Other actions of his demonstrated the sane thinking. He slowed down their plans, which were to carve up America into smaller and smaller chunks in a typical divide-and-conquer strategy. He kept the union together. Despite the problems, that's part of what allowed our dreams of and hopes for Q to take place. It's difficult to argue what-if scenarios, but if the South had successfully seceded, is there any doubt that the bankers and cabal would've destroyed the USA entirely, leaving us with 5-30 nations across the continent, ripe for more royal and tyrannical conquests?
That said, the cabal killed Lincoln precisely because that was his plan.
There is evidence that supports that statement. That is why I stated explicitly I don't know what Lincoln's intentions really were. The evidence suggests the war was not caused by what we believe it was. And why would that be a surprise? EVERY single other war that America has been involved in was caused by a false fucking flag or was instigated by forces pulling strings, having nothing to do with the official narrative. People don't want to believe that is true about the Civil War because they need Lincoln to be a good guy. They need at least that one hero.
Maybe he was. I have no idea. I have seen evidence that suggests that. The Greenback was a big blow to bankers and likely was the reason he was killed, but at the same time there is a fair bit of evidence, even in his speeches, that he was not quite as good of a guy as people believe. He was perhaps just another duplicitous politician. If that is true, then the Greenback and his assassination doesn't make a lot of sense, but whatever the Truth is, I assert it is not as straight forward as the official narrative, or even a first glance at the evidence.
He slowed down their plans, which were to carve up America into smaller and smaller chunks in a typical divide-and-conquer strategy.
I don't think this was ever their plan. I think this went against their plan. A unified American Government (in the all powerful sense) which is exactly what the Civil War established was always their plan, from the beginning of America.
The more I look, the more things are just not as straight forward as they seem. You really need to dig to even have any idea of the level of fuckery these people are capable of.
is there any doubt that the bankers and cabal would've destroyed the USA entirely
They did destroy the USA entirely. Keeping America together allowed them to create the illusion of losing, when in fact it was their greatest victory. Without the strength of a unified America (singular all powerful government) creating their Machine (The Fed, The Matrix, Megacorp, etc.) would have been impossible.
Hmm. I think 30 countries would have been easier to conquer, and civil war was their first crack. So I suspect that Lincoln made them take their Plan B, which is what developed over successive years, including the fed-based slavery system. But I could be mistaken, and could do with more research on the topic, especially before defending it more. But the cabal's smears of Lincoln make me think he was a good guy. On the wars, would you say the War of 1812 and the Barbary Coast Wars were based on deception as well?
Hmm. I think 30 countries would have been easier to conquer
In a kinetic war this might be true. The real enemy is not a "fighter", they are a manipulator. Taking over 30 sovereign states would have been a fucking nightmare. And it wouldn't have been their machine. The fed was not "Plan B". The fed was the plan from the 18th century. They needed a strong America, a "one American government" to create the Fed to take over the world. America was their tool. The play goes back so much further than people realize. At least that is where my investigation has led. Evidence will be forthcoming soon enough.
War of 1812
The War of 1812 was the weirdest shit ever. In addition to no one agreeing on what happened in that war, or why it even started, it seems to me that mostly what they did was come in and destroy some documents (and the White House/Capitol) and then left. Why did they come in and destroy documents and leave? What were those documents?
I wish I could answer that question. It could be absolutely massive. Barbary coast I haven't looked at. I will only say every single war I have looked at so far, which has been most, was filled with fuckery that is not taught in our history.
1812 was bigger than Dolly Madison and the capitol buildings; it was the empire's attempt to ignore and undo the revolution. They also attacked New Orleans and tried to make it a beachhead for further incursions, and threatened from Canada. Imo it was the real deal, and legit on its face. Same with Barbary Coast. Both involved ignoring US sovereignty and impressing its merchants and ships into involuntary servitude of one type of another. The research is fascinating, but it takes time and (especially if you're into obscured history) records are ever harder to find.
Agree with the overall story, but believe that Lincoln would've kept the union strong and free, extending that golden age if he had lived. That said, the cabal killed Lincoln precisely because that was his plan. After the victory, he said it was right to begin playing Dixie again, symbolizing a much kinder reunification than what actually happened. Other actions of his demonstrated the sane thinking. He slowed down their plans, which were to carve up America into smaller and smaller chunks in a typical divide-and-conquer strategy. He kept the union together. Despite the problems, that's part of what allowed our dreams of and hopes for Q to take place. It's difficult to argue what-if scenarios, but if the South had successfully seceded, is there any doubt that the bankers and cabal would've destroyed the USA entirely, leaving us with 5-30 nations across the continent, ripe for more royal and tyrannical conquests?
There is evidence that supports that statement. That is why I stated explicitly I don't know what Lincoln's intentions really were. The evidence suggests the war was not caused by what we believe it was. And why would that be a surprise? EVERY single other war that America has been involved in was caused by a false fucking flag or was instigated by forces pulling strings, having nothing to do with the official narrative. People don't want to believe that is true about the Civil War because they need Lincoln to be a good guy. They need at least that one hero.
Maybe he was. I have no idea. I have seen evidence that suggests that. The Greenback was a big blow to bankers and likely was the reason he was killed, but at the same time there is a fair bit of evidence, even in his speeches, that he was not quite as good of a guy as people believe. He was perhaps just another duplicitous politician. If that is true, then the Greenback and his assassination doesn't make a lot of sense, but whatever the Truth is, I assert it is not as straight forward as the official narrative, or even a first glance at the evidence.
I don't think this was ever their plan. I think this went against their plan. A unified American Government (in the all powerful sense) which is exactly what the Civil War established was always their plan, from the beginning of America.
The more I look, the more things are just not as straight forward as they seem. You really need to dig to even have any idea of the level of fuckery these people are capable of.
They did destroy the USA entirely. Keeping America together allowed them to create the illusion of losing, when in fact it was their greatest victory. Without the strength of a unified America (singular all powerful government) creating their Machine (The Fed, The Matrix, Megacorp, etc.) would have been impossible.
Hmm. I think 30 countries would have been easier to conquer, and civil war was their first crack. So I suspect that Lincoln made them take their Plan B, which is what developed over successive years, including the fed-based slavery system. But I could be mistaken, and could do with more research on the topic, especially before defending it more. But the cabal's smears of Lincoln make me think he was a good guy. On the wars, would you say the War of 1812 and the Barbary Coast Wars were based on deception as well?
In a kinetic war this might be true. The real enemy is not a "fighter", they are a manipulator. Taking over 30 sovereign states would have been a fucking nightmare. And it wouldn't have been their machine. The fed was not "Plan B". The fed was the plan from the 18th century. They needed a strong America, a "one American government" to create the Fed to take over the world. America was their tool. The play goes back so much further than people realize. At least that is where my investigation has led. Evidence will be forthcoming soon enough.
The War of 1812 was the weirdest shit ever. In addition to no one agreeing on what happened in that war, or why it even started, it seems to me that mostly what they did was come in and destroy some documents (and the White House/Capitol) and then left. Why did they come in and destroy documents and leave? What were those documents?
I wish I could answer that question. It could be absolutely massive. Barbary coast I haven't looked at. I will only say every single war I have looked at so far, which has been most, was filled with fuckery that is not taught in our history.
1812 was bigger than Dolly Madison and the capitol buildings; it was the empire's attempt to ignore and undo the revolution. They also attacked New Orleans and tried to make it a beachhead for further incursions, and threatened from Canada. Imo it was the real deal, and legit on its face. Same with Barbary Coast. Both involved ignoring US sovereignty and impressing its merchants and ships into involuntary servitude of one type of another. The research is fascinating, but it takes time and (especially if you're into obscured history) records are ever harder to find.
Yep, it was easier for the cabal to exert influence over United States than it would have been to control separate states.