Lost Cause propaganda bullshit that has been debunked time and time and time again
“Debunked” is a fraud. It is the idea that an argument is closed because it has been rebutted. Usually, within the absolutely amazing fraud that we call “debunked”, all that is required is a single rebuttal. That is not how we find the Truth. Investigations into the truth never close any doors. New evidence is always allowed to be presented, rebuttals rebutted, etc.. There is no such thing as debunked in the effort to find the Truth.
my masters is in American History
Part 2 of my report is on The Matrix. The reason we are stuck in the Matrix, the way it was created in the first place was by taking over all of the information sources. The first thing they took over was the book publishers (they were the first book publishers). That’s not actually true. The first thing they took over was Religion, but that’s going back too far. We will start with the publishers. Then they took over all media.
See Sir Evelyn de Rothschild who gave a talk at Peking University (which was created by Rockefeller) at which he said (@7:20):
[Talking about his families banking empire] We covered Europe. We covered the European Union that we have today. From that grew a business which was successfully built upon an understanding between the five brothers. The five brothers used to talk to each other through writing. That was one side. They were also the first client of a man called Mr. Reuter. Mr. Reuter made his name by flying pigeons around the world, and if you couldn’t send messages, you used a pigeon. And that’s why we were the first client of the great house of Reuter. Which as you know became the most important messaging company in the world today. And from that it grew, over a period of time.
This is not intended to be a full argument. I have 500 pages of argument in my report. I am giving you a taste of what’s coming when I present it to the world.
Then they took over schools. In 1903 Rockefeller started the General Education Board for example. Again, just one piece of a thousand pieces of evidence.
In 1954 the Reece Committee looked at Foundations influence in schools. Foundations drive all research. You can’t even get funding for any project if you don’t follow what they want you to research. You can’t publish in any journal, you can’t get any degree if you don’t toe the line of the official narrative. That doesn’t mean you can’t think outside the box, but you can’t think too far outside of it or you are effectively deleted (called a crackpot, or a quack, etc.).
In 1982 Norman Dodd talked about his experience during this congressional Committee to find evidence. The video of his interview is at the bottom of that link. The video starts at 14ish minutes in. His exposition of History begins within ten minutes of that I think.
He tells about how his assistant got access to the Carnegie (same as Rockefeller) minutes of Foundation meetings. He talks about how they took over all of what was allowed to be taught and what was the allowed printing of material in American History. He suggests all official history that is allowed to be taught is fraudulent with the intention of bringing America into a one world government of Communism. These minutes are from 100 years ago. They have been working on this project for a very long time (much longer than that, but this is evidence of at least that time frame).
Him saying these things, and me presenting them doesn’t make his statement true, but it does make his evidence compelling (I HIGHLY recommend you listen to it). That evidence is “primary” in the sense that Norman Dodd is saying it, and given everything that he was a part of (the Reece Committee e.g.) he is a credible witness. Again, not necessarily true, but his interview seems to me that he believes it. Just one more piece of the puzzle. There are hundreds more.
Whatever bad happened as a result of the failed rebellion, could have been avoided had the rebels not rebelled.
I suggest this is completely incorrect. Nothing could have been avoided. Look at it again with that in mind. Or rather, try to prove that statement incorrect.
You're blaming the wrong people for the negative things that unfortunately did happen.
I am blaming the Bankers. I stated that explicitly. I assure you, they are not the “wrong people.”
Truth is truth fren.
Truth is Truth, i.e. Truth is What Is. “truth” (lower case) is what people think they see, or have read, or were told, etc. that they interpret as Truth. If you own all the sources that show, tell, write, etc. what kind of fraud could you perpetrate? Could you create an entire world of fraud? Could you create, using pieces of the Truth, but hiding all the really important bits, an entire fraud of History? Could you create The Matrix?
the Democrat lies
This suggests to me you are still stuck in The Matrix. “The Democrat Lies” is the lie. There is no such thing as a “Democrat” in the way you mean it. Nor is there a “Republican.” They are two sides of the same controlled slave caste. Both are lies. All are lies. The whole world is The Matrix. Until you see who the real enemy is, you are bound to (bounded by) the fraud. In fact, I suggest in your investigations you keep in mind the question “who is the real enemy” in every situation. The more you dig, the more surprising the apparent answers become.
If you wish to present evidence to back up your claims instead of ad hominem attacks (“Democrat lies”/”Debunked”/etc.) or appeals to authority I am all ears. I will not be looking through your post history, but if you wish to link specific ones that you feel present an argument I will look. Please do your best to present primary evidence. As in, recognize that what you are presenting is someone’s words. It is not Truth. It is especially not Truth if it was from some book. If I have to go digging through a book to find their references to then go looking through that reference to find another reference etc. I will not consider your evidence credible. I need to see what people say. Court cases are a great source. Laws in the books are great. Black’s Law Dictionary is a great source. Congressional investigation Committees are great. Websites in someone’s own words (like the Rockefeller websites telling me themselves about their fuckery). Government websites are great (like SEC reports that tell of Rockefuckery), etc. FOIA request documents, also fantastic.
It is so hard to write. I'm trying to red-pill the entire planet. Hopefully I can at least get a substantial portion of a mostly brain dead reddit (Superstonk/GME etc. to start). Even people here are going to be shocked by what I report. It's all primary evidence. The evidence is fucking nuts. We really live in The Matrix, even if it isn't exactly as portrayed by the movie. The parallels are unreal. Whoever wrote that movie knew exactly what was going on.
The hardest part is the amount of evidence. I can't stop writing. I can't fucking finish it. I try to finish one part and I find too much damned evidence!
Once I finish I will have to pare it down by so much. It's gonna be rough.
I will be creating a website. Maybe i will put a longer version there, or break it up into small sections (probably both).
It's the hardest thing I've ever done, writing this report. Just because there is so much.
Yes. Nothing is ever isolated. It's all a tangled web the branches put and each branch has its own network of branches that is perpetual.
Even the spygate scandal was such a web that Dan Bongino wrote two phenomenal books and has a daily hour long podcast dedicated to the subject for well over a year (I had actually stopped listening to his podcast because I was so sick of the subject matter and following every connection xD
That's just spygate xD
And primary sources is the way to go. It is why we are so informed and the normies who follow the "news" talking points are so damn wrong.
Studies, interviews, emails, documents, boots on the ground, THAT is how you approach truth (although sometimes unabashed pure truth is unobtainable but we can get damn close)
because of Lincoln's war... We lost America directly because of Lincoln's war... he declared war on the south.
This is your central claim. You laid blame on Abraham Lincoln. The way you falsely portray the rebellion as a "war" that Lincoln started, is simply untrue. He dutifully responded to the insurrection and rebellion being levied against the USA. Again, I don't disagree with you that there was fuckery afoot, instigated and exploited by some evil people. But your understanding of what transpired, just isn't correct.
This is your central claim. You laid blame on Abraham Lincoln.
Completely incorrect. Nothing I have stated relies on that statement.
Please do a better job of presenting evidence. I am not going to go through all that shit. I am writing something that I hope will help a lot of people escape The Matrix. How many hours do you think I should waste on your non-primary evidence before I get to a primary source that may or may not support your claims?
If you want to present evidence, give me a synopsis of your link (one sentence is fine). Note the source of your evidence. If someone gives evidence in a video, give me a synopsis and an approximate time to look at that supports your claims. Please let that source have at least primary references within it.
I don't want to listen to someone else's shit. I seriously doubt you listened to my video past the first couple minutes (if at all). I admit that was not the best way to present any evidence, but it was a quick reply and it was not an important piece of evidence (even though for some reason you think it was my "central claim").
Evidence please, not someone else's words, unless you want me to take THEIR words as meaningful. I.e. if any of those links go to Abraham Lincoln himself, or maybe some other meaningful primary source then please point out which ones.
Coincidentally I actually watched the video you posted, back on September 21st. Would you like to see my YouTube watch history to confirm? Livingston just regurgitated the same crap spewed by other Lost Cause apologists. Your first red flag, if you did your research about him, should have been his membership in the Sons of Confederate Veterans. During my years living in South Carolina, I became well acquainted with many other native South Carolinians like Livingston. He means well, but his delusional love of "HeRitAgE" and refusal to accept that he was duped growing up and being educated in South Carolina, by promoters of Lost Cause fake history, is clearly evident. Not surprising that he's the founder of the Abbeville Institute, associating himself with Thomas DiLorenzo, an even bigger con artist masquerading as a "historian"... more bluntly put, he's an idiot profiteering off gullible people. Fren, please better research your sources.
I gave you a synopsis of the Rebellion of 1860 already, one you just didn't like. You asked for references. I gave them to you. If you actually watch the videos and read the books, you'll see that they are all backed by primary sources. You can choose to watch, listen and read them, or be lazy and remain in your state of delusion. Good luck fren.
Your first red flag, if you did your research about him, should have been his membership in the Sons of Confederate Veterans.
This is exactly how people stay in The Matrix.
I don't give a fuck who he is. I only care about the evidence he presents. I can find corroborating primary evidence that supports some of his claims. THAT is all that matters in the search for the Truth. Learn what evidence is, and what it isn't. Debate is never an attack on the presenter of evidence or logic. It can only ever be a direct address of the evidence or logic itself with other evidence and logic (pointing out hidden axioms, etc.).
please better research your sources.
I am trying to explain to you that this type of thinking is the training of The Matrix. It is a fraud. Did you actually read all that I have written? Please do, there is so much in there that I think might help you. If you are ready to hear it. You might not be. Everyone gets past each veil at their own pace.
I gave you a synopsis of the Rebellion of 1860 already, one you just didn't like
Wrong. I didn't not like it. I thought it didn't address the specifics of the argument presented. There is a huge difference between those two things.
You asked for references.
I asked for evidence not references. I don't want to have to search your references for evidence.
Please try to understand what that word means. In The Matrix, evidence is not only what someone says, but who is saying it. Books are at least suspect and are very likely fraudulent. Except where the lead to primary sources, they are mostly useless (unless they have been used in court cases, then they become a primary source themselves (like an affidavit) as far as our laws are concerned).
If you actually watch the videos and read the books, you'll see that they are all backed by primary sources.
When presenting evidence, it is essential that you don't just throw a wall of shit at people. As I said, expecting me to dig through a thousand hours of secondary (or tertiary, etc.) shit to get a some nugget of actual primary source evidence is not a "presentation of evidence", its just rude. As if you are doing your due diligence by forcing me to do all the work. Presenting evidence (if there is any even in there) in the way you have is meaningless. I want evidence, in primary format and I want it spoon fucking fed to me (give me the page, give me the approximate time in the video) where the primary evidence is shown.
Look at how I did it in my longest post where I presented actual evidence. I gave you the quote itself, I linked to the video, and I gave the time. In the case of the Norman Dodd interview (which will be a very hard red-pill for you to swallow, but maybe the most important video you will ever see in your life considering your stated background) I gave the approximate time, and an approximate quote so you could find it without too much difficulty. The first format is exactly how it should be done. The second I will accept. Anything else I consider to be you doing everything you can to not present evidence.
“Debunked” is a fraud. It is the idea that an argument is closed because it has been rebutted. Usually, within the absolutely amazing fraud that we call “debunked”, all that is required is a single rebuttal. That is not how we find the Truth. Investigations into the truth never close any doors. New evidence is always allowed to be presented, rebuttals rebutted, etc.. There is no such thing as debunked in the effort to find the Truth.
Part 2 of my report is on The Matrix. The reason we are stuck in the Matrix, the way it was created in the first place was by taking over all of the information sources. The first thing they took over was the book publishers (they were the first book publishers). That’s not actually true. The first thing they took over was Religion, but that’s going back too far. We will start with the publishers. Then they took over all media.
See Sir Evelyn de Rothschild who gave a talk at Peking University (which was created by Rockefeller) at which he said (@7:20):
This is not intended to be a full argument. I have 500 pages of argument in my report. I am giving you a taste of what’s coming when I present it to the world.
Then they took over schools. In 1903 Rockefeller started the General Education Board for example. Again, just one piece of a thousand pieces of evidence.
In 1954 the Reece Committee looked at Foundations influence in schools. Foundations drive all research. You can’t even get funding for any project if you don’t follow what they want you to research. You can’t publish in any journal, you can’t get any degree if you don’t toe the line of the official narrative. That doesn’t mean you can’t think outside the box, but you can’t think too far outside of it or you are effectively deleted (called a crackpot, or a quack, etc.).
In 1982 Norman Dodd talked about his experience during this congressional Committee to find evidence. The video of his interview is at the bottom of that link. The video starts at 14ish minutes in. His exposition of History begins within ten minutes of that I think.
He tells about how his assistant got access to the Carnegie (same as Rockefeller) minutes of Foundation meetings. He talks about how they took over all of what was allowed to be taught and what was the allowed printing of material in American History. He suggests all official history that is allowed to be taught is fraudulent with the intention of bringing America into a one world government of Communism. These minutes are from 100 years ago. They have been working on this project for a very long time (much longer than that, but this is evidence of at least that time frame).
Him saying these things, and me presenting them doesn’t make his statement true, but it does make his evidence compelling (I HIGHLY recommend you listen to it). That evidence is “primary” in the sense that Norman Dodd is saying it, and given everything that he was a part of (the Reece Committee e.g.) he is a credible witness. Again, not necessarily true, but his interview seems to me that he believes it. Just one more piece of the puzzle. There are hundreds more.
I suggest this is completely incorrect. Nothing could have been avoided. Look at it again with that in mind. Or rather, try to prove that statement incorrect.
I am blaming the Bankers. I stated that explicitly. I assure you, they are not the “wrong people.”
Truth is Truth, i.e. Truth is What Is. “truth” (lower case) is what people think they see, or have read, or were told, etc. that they interpret as Truth. If you own all the sources that show, tell, write, etc. what kind of fraud could you perpetrate? Could you create an entire world of fraud? Could you create, using pieces of the Truth, but hiding all the really important bits, an entire fraud of History? Could you create The Matrix?
This suggests to me you are still stuck in The Matrix. “The Democrat Lies” is the lie. There is no such thing as a “Democrat” in the way you mean it. Nor is there a “Republican.” They are two sides of the same controlled slave caste. Both are lies. All are lies. The whole world is The Matrix. Until you see who the real enemy is, you are bound to (bounded by) the fraud. In fact, I suggest in your investigations you keep in mind the question “who is the real enemy” in every situation. The more you dig, the more surprising the apparent answers become.
If you wish to present evidence to back up your claims instead of ad hominem attacks (“Democrat lies”/”Debunked”/etc.) or appeals to authority I am all ears. I will not be looking through your post history, but if you wish to link specific ones that you feel present an argument I will look. Please do your best to present primary evidence. As in, recognize that what you are presenting is someone’s words. It is not Truth. It is especially not Truth if it was from some book. If I have to go digging through a book to find their references to then go looking through that reference to find another reference etc. I will not consider your evidence credible. I need to see what people say. Court cases are a great source. Laws in the books are great. Black’s Law Dictionary is a great source. Congressional investigation Committees are great. Websites in someone’s own words (like the Rockefeller websites telling me themselves about their fuckery). Government websites are great (like SEC reports that tell of Rockefuckery), etc. FOIA request documents, also fantastic.
I would love to read your report!
It is so hard to write. I'm trying to red-pill the entire planet. Hopefully I can at least get a substantial portion of a mostly brain dead reddit (Superstonk/GME etc. to start). Even people here are going to be shocked by what I report. It's all primary evidence. The evidence is fucking nuts. We really live in The Matrix, even if it isn't exactly as portrayed by the movie. The parallels are unreal. Whoever wrote that movie knew exactly what was going on.
The hardest part is the amount of evidence. I can't stop writing. I can't fucking finish it. I try to finish one part and I find too much damned evidence!
Once I finish I will have to pare it down by so much. It's gonna be rough.
I will be creating a website. Maybe i will put a longer version there, or break it up into small sections (probably both).
It's the hardest thing I've ever done, writing this report. Just because there is so much.
Yes. Nothing is ever isolated. It's all a tangled web the branches put and each branch has its own network of branches that is perpetual.
Even the spygate scandal was such a web that Dan Bongino wrote two phenomenal books and has a daily hour long podcast dedicated to the subject for well over a year (I had actually stopped listening to his podcast because I was so sick of the subject matter and following every connection xD
That's just spygate xD
And primary sources is the way to go. It is why we are so informed and the normies who follow the "news" talking points are so damn wrong.
Studies, interviews, emails, documents, boots on the ground, THAT is how you approach truth (although sometimes unabashed pure truth is unobtainable but we can get damn close)
This is your central claim. You laid blame on Abraham Lincoln. The way you falsely portray the rebellion as a "war" that Lincoln started, is simply untrue. He dutifully responded to the insurrection and rebellion being levied against the USA. Again, I don't disagree with you that there was fuckery afoot, instigated and exploited by some evil people. But your understanding of what transpired, just isn't correct.
You can start here:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwCiRao53J1y_gqJJOH6Rcgpb-vaW9wF0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otTsbqK4U7o&t=529s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6DiA_7AjcU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3E2FdedPwU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EOhXF5lNgQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbEjmEyHf8U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc0GvbzhoWs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Elc1-j6Jrg
For when you have more time for easy reading, you can start with the following...
https://tinyurl.com/4h5msr45
https://tinyurl.com/xtdtpvtt
https://tinyurl.com/yymtxn3s
https://tinyurl.com/9spk73m8
https://tinyurl.com/59ftuzww
https://tinyurl.com/sndbxaah
Completely incorrect. Nothing I have stated relies on that statement.
Please do a better job of presenting evidence. I am not going to go through all that shit. I am writing something that I hope will help a lot of people escape The Matrix. How many hours do you think I should waste on your non-primary evidence before I get to a primary source that may or may not support your claims?
If you want to present evidence, give me a synopsis of your link (one sentence is fine). Note the source of your evidence. If someone gives evidence in a video, give me a synopsis and an approximate time to look at that supports your claims. Please let that source have at least primary references within it.
I don't want to listen to someone else's shit. I seriously doubt you listened to my video past the first couple minutes (if at all). I admit that was not the best way to present any evidence, but it was a quick reply and it was not an important piece of evidence (even though for some reason you think it was my "central claim").
Evidence please, not someone else's words, unless you want me to take THEIR words as meaningful. I.e. if any of those links go to Abraham Lincoln himself, or maybe some other meaningful primary source then please point out which ones.
Coincidentally I actually watched the video you posted, back on September 21st. Would you like to see my YouTube watch history to confirm? Livingston just regurgitated the same crap spewed by other Lost Cause apologists. Your first red flag, if you did your research about him, should have been his membership in the Sons of Confederate Veterans. During my years living in South Carolina, I became well acquainted with many other native South Carolinians like Livingston. He means well, but his delusional love of "HeRitAgE" and refusal to accept that he was duped growing up and being educated in South Carolina, by promoters of Lost Cause fake history, is clearly evident. Not surprising that he's the founder of the Abbeville Institute, associating himself with Thomas DiLorenzo, an even bigger con artist masquerading as a "historian"... more bluntly put, he's an idiot profiteering off gullible people. Fren, please better research your sources.
I gave you a synopsis of the Rebellion of 1860 already, one you just didn't like. You asked for references. I gave them to you. If you actually watch the videos and read the books, you'll see that they are all backed by primary sources. You can choose to watch, listen and read them, or be lazy and remain in your state of delusion. Good luck fren.
This is exactly how people stay in The Matrix.
I don't give a fuck who he is. I only care about the evidence he presents. I can find corroborating primary evidence that supports some of his claims. THAT is all that matters in the search for the Truth. Learn what evidence is, and what it isn't. Debate is never an attack on the presenter of evidence or logic. It can only ever be a direct address of the evidence or logic itself with other evidence and logic (pointing out hidden axioms, etc.).
I am trying to explain to you that this type of thinking is the training of The Matrix. It is a fraud. Did you actually read all that I have written? Please do, there is so much in there that I think might help you. If you are ready to hear it. You might not be. Everyone gets past each veil at their own pace.
Wrong. I didn't not like it. I thought it didn't address the specifics of the argument presented. There is a huge difference between those two things.
I asked for evidence not references. I don't want to have to search your references for evidence.
Please try to understand what that word means. In The Matrix, evidence is not only what someone says, but who is saying it. Books are at least suspect and are very likely fraudulent. Except where the lead to primary sources, they are mostly useless (unless they have been used in court cases, then they become a primary source themselves (like an affidavit) as far as our laws are concerned).
When presenting evidence, it is essential that you don't just throw a wall of shit at people. As I said, expecting me to dig through a thousand hours of secondary (or tertiary, etc.) shit to get a some nugget of actual primary source evidence is not a "presentation of evidence", its just rude. As if you are doing your due diligence by forcing me to do all the work. Presenting evidence (if there is any even in there) in the way you have is meaningless. I want evidence, in primary format and I want it spoon fucking fed to me (give me the page, give me the approximate time in the video) where the primary evidence is shown.
Look at how I did it in my longest post where I presented actual evidence. I gave you the quote itself, I linked to the video, and I gave the time. In the case of the Norman Dodd interview (which will be a very hard red-pill for you to swallow, but maybe the most important video you will ever see in your life considering your stated background) I gave the approximate time, and an approximate quote so you could find it without too much difficulty. The first format is exactly how it should be done. The second I will accept. Anything else I consider to be you doing everything you can to not present evidence.