technically, eugenics is a biological improvement by selecting for better attributes like we do with agriculture and animals. it's why men want a beautiful wife and women want a strong, intelligent husband, and why family intermarriage is forbidden - leads to severe mental and physical handicaps.
it does not mean killing off people you don't like -- that's what psychopaths do. nor does it mean cultivating some race of geniuses -- geniuses don't produce geniuses. geniuses arise from healthy normal population. most importantly, it does not mean imposing on the rights of unsuspecting peoples, or forced sterility. these are all questions of ethics and morality, not eugenics.
the "population reduction" scheme promoted by Gates and other 'elites' has nothing to do with eugenics or improving our biological condition. population is rising among so-called 3rd world conditions, but among western caucasians and in Japan, these ethnic group populations are crashing. there is no "global population" crisis. there are only areas where population is rising faster than it can self-maintain (food, clean water, sanitation, health, security) which makes for local and thus regional instability. wiping out population arbitrarily, a Gates fetish, could be killing off the very ablest genetic traits destined to grow our civilization.
I think we're making the same point. control of populations is only something a sociopathic "elite" would have the hubris to attempt. they fail because they lack a moral compass, not because they lack 'power.'
the choosing of mates is generally associated improved benefits for offspring. for example, in humans, couples that have "chemistry" have children with more resilient immune systems.
it does not mean killing off people you don't like -- that's what psychopaths do. nor does it mean cultivating some race of geniuses -- geniuses don't produce geniuses. geniuses arise from healthy normal population. most importantly, it does not mean imposing on the rights of unsuspecting peoples, or forced sterility. these are all questions of ethics and morality, not eugenics.
These things you say "it does not mean" are exactly what it meant to the people of the early 20th century (and likely still does). This is exactly what they say in their writing on these topics all over the place. That genius begets genius, and we need to eliminate those who are poor thinkers. See the forced sterilization of men and women in "asylums" from the 1920-1970s. Its been going on for a long, long time. Look up the Mississippi appendectomy. Look at the reality of Planned Parenthood, who funds it, what it does, what it does with the aborted babies, etc. It is not what it appears to be.
The loose definition you suggest and the practice of eugenics are not congruent, just like so many other abuses of words the PTB use to get away with taking over the world.
all good points. they were not just arrogant, but foolish in not understanding nature vs nurture, and their actions did untold damage. my point is the current bioweapon is not even remotely disguised as a false 'benevolence' -- it's just genocide.
my intended premise was that the current campaign of bioweapon-engineered virus and mRNA injections is not remotely "eugenics" as was suggested; it's demonic levels of evil intended to kill, control, and genetically destroy survivors.
technically, eugenics is a biological improvement by selecting for better attributes like we do with agriculture and animals. it's why men want a beautiful wife and women want a strong, intelligent husband, and why family intermarriage is forbidden - leads to severe mental and physical handicaps.
it does not mean killing off people you don't like -- that's what psychopaths do. nor does it mean cultivating some race of geniuses -- geniuses don't produce geniuses. geniuses arise from healthy normal population. most importantly, it does not mean imposing on the rights of unsuspecting peoples, or forced sterility. these are all questions of ethics and morality, not eugenics.
the "population reduction" scheme promoted by Gates and other 'elites' has nothing to do with eugenics or improving our biological condition. population is rising among so-called 3rd world conditions, but among western caucasians and in Japan, these ethnic group populations are crashing. there is no "global population" crisis. there are only areas where population is rising faster than it can self-maintain (food, clean water, sanitation, health, security) which makes for local and thus regional instability. wiping out population arbitrarily, a Gates fetish, could be killing off the very ablest genetic traits destined to grow our civilization.
I think we're making the same point. control of populations is only something a sociopathic "elite" would have the hubris to attempt. they fail because they lack a moral compass, not because they lack 'power.'
the choosing of mates is generally associated improved benefits for offspring. for example, in humans, couples that have "chemistry" have children with more resilient immune systems.
These things you say "it does not mean" are exactly what it meant to the people of the early 20th century (and likely still does). This is exactly what they say in their writing on these topics all over the place. That genius begets genius, and we need to eliminate those who are poor thinkers. See the forced sterilization of men and women in "asylums" from the 1920-1970s. Its been going on for a long, long time. Look up the Mississippi appendectomy. Look at the reality of Planned Parenthood, who funds it, what it does, what it does with the aborted babies, etc. It is not what it appears to be.
The loose definition you suggest and the practice of eugenics are not congruent, just like so many other abuses of words the PTB use to get away with taking over the world.
all good points. they were not just arrogant, but foolish in not understanding nature vs nurture, and their actions did untold damage. my point is the current bioweapon is not even remotely disguised as a false 'benevolence' -- it's just genocide.
I suppose you're against couples seeking genetic counseling when they have a known heritable disorder in their family lines?
my intended premise was that the current campaign of bioweapon-engineered virus and mRNA injections is not remotely "eugenics" as was suggested; it's demonic levels of evil intended to kill, control, and genetically destroy survivors.