No God wouldn’t disagree. Read the books of Isaiah, Malachi and there are others that say that people will reap what they sow and that whatever evils against others a man does, God will heap those coals back upon their own heads
They found nazi eugenicists in south america after they diedjust by following medical statistical anomalies, and exhuming his body to verify. The nazis themselves are likely still very active, just calling their party another name.
The Eugenicists, in no small part the Zionists (Jews) created the Nazi's to be the world's eugenicists. They tried to install a fascist government in 1932(33?) in America to begin the eugenics program in full force here in parallel with the Nazi's in Germany. The American government was the Nazi government, and still is. It's all the same group, doing all the same things for all the same reasons pulling from the same bank accounts.
The whole of the 19th and 20th centuries has been the eugenicists trying to purify the world. Or at least on a certain level that statement has validity. I think its been going on for much longer than that, and that was just the latest ploy, but eugenics has been front and center of the entire thing for the entire time.
technically, eugenics is a biological improvement by selecting for better attributes like we do with agriculture and animals. it's why men want a beautiful wife and women want a strong, intelligent husband, and why family intermarriage is forbidden - leads to severe mental and physical handicaps.
it does not mean killing off people you don't like -- that's what psychopaths do. nor does it mean cultivating some race of geniuses -- geniuses don't produce geniuses. geniuses arise from healthy normal population. most importantly, it does not mean imposing on the rights of unsuspecting peoples, or forced sterility. these are all questions of ethics and morality, not eugenics.
the "population reduction" scheme promoted by Gates and other 'elites' has nothing to do with eugenics or improving our biological condition. population is rising among so-called 3rd world conditions, but among western caucasians and in Japan, these ethnic group populations are crashing. there is no "global population" crisis. there are only areas where population is rising faster than it can self-maintain (food, clean water, sanitation, health, security) which makes for local and thus regional instability. wiping out population arbitrarily, a Gates fetish, could be killing off the very ablest genetic traits destined to grow our civilization.
I think we're making the same point. control of populations is only something a sociopathic "elite" would have the hubris to attempt. they fail because they lack a moral compass, not because they lack 'power.'
the choosing of mates is generally associated improved benefits for offspring. for example, in humans, couples that have "chemistry" have children with more resilient immune systems.
it does not mean killing off people you don't like -- that's what psychopaths do. nor does it mean cultivating some race of geniuses -- geniuses don't produce geniuses. geniuses arise from healthy normal population. most importantly, it does not mean imposing on the rights of unsuspecting peoples, or forced sterility. these are all questions of ethics and morality, not eugenics.
These things you say "it does not mean" are exactly what it meant to the people of the early 20th century (and likely still does). This is exactly what they say in their writing on these topics all over the place. That genius begets genius, and we need to eliminate those who are poor thinkers. See the forced sterilization of men and women in "asylums" from the 1920-1970s. Its been going on for a long, long time. Look up the Mississippi appendectomy. Look at the reality of Planned Parenthood, who funds it, what it does, what it does with the aborted babies, etc. It is not what it appears to be.
The loose definition you suggest and the practice of eugenics are not congruent, just like so many other abuses of words the PTB use to get away with taking over the world.
all good points. they were not just arrogant, but foolish in not understanding nature vs nurture, and their actions did untold damage. my point is the current bioweapon is not even remotely disguised as a false 'benevolence' -- it's just genocide.
Amen
I thought he whipped the sheep and the oxen, not the actual humans. Correct me if I'm wrong.
He whipped cattle, oxen and overturned money changers tables i. The temple and chased them out with a whip
No God wouldn’t disagree. Read the books of Isaiah, Malachi and there are others that say that people will reap what they sow and that whatever evils against others a man does, God will heap those coals back upon their own heads
Agreed.
They found nazi eugenicists in south america after they diedjust by following medical statistical anomalies, and exhuming his body to verify. The nazis themselves are likely still very active, just calling their party another name.
They now call themselves Democrats.
The modern Democrat Party you mean?
The Eugenicists, in no small part the Zionists (Jews) created the Nazi's to be the world's eugenicists. They tried to install a fascist government in 1932(33?) in America to begin the eugenics program in full force here in parallel with the Nazi's in Germany. The American government was the Nazi government, and still is. It's all the same group, doing all the same things for all the same reasons pulling from the same bank accounts.
The whole of the 19th and 20th centuries has been the eugenicists trying to purify the world. Or at least on a certain level that statement has validity. I think its been going on for much longer than that, and that was just the latest ploy, but eugenics has been front and center of the entire thing for the entire time.
Exactly. Eugenics was alive and well in the US long before the Nazis rose to power in Germany.
with slow motion and sound again and again ... That evil retard
technically, eugenics is a biological improvement by selecting for better attributes like we do with agriculture and animals. it's why men want a beautiful wife and women want a strong, intelligent husband, and why family intermarriage is forbidden - leads to severe mental and physical handicaps.
it does not mean killing off people you don't like -- that's what psychopaths do. nor does it mean cultivating some race of geniuses -- geniuses don't produce geniuses. geniuses arise from healthy normal population. most importantly, it does not mean imposing on the rights of unsuspecting peoples, or forced sterility. these are all questions of ethics and morality, not eugenics.
the "population reduction" scheme promoted by Gates and other 'elites' has nothing to do with eugenics or improving our biological condition. population is rising among so-called 3rd world conditions, but among western caucasians and in Japan, these ethnic group populations are crashing. there is no "global population" crisis. there are only areas where population is rising faster than it can self-maintain (food, clean water, sanitation, health, security) which makes for local and thus regional instability. wiping out population arbitrarily, a Gates fetish, could be killing off the very ablest genetic traits destined to grow our civilization.
I think we're making the same point. control of populations is only something a sociopathic "elite" would have the hubris to attempt. they fail because they lack a moral compass, not because they lack 'power.'
the choosing of mates is generally associated improved benefits for offspring. for example, in humans, couples that have "chemistry" have children with more resilient immune systems.
These things you say "it does not mean" are exactly what it meant to the people of the early 20th century (and likely still does). This is exactly what they say in their writing on these topics all over the place. That genius begets genius, and we need to eliminate those who are poor thinkers. See the forced sterilization of men and women in "asylums" from the 1920-1970s. Its been going on for a long, long time. Look up the Mississippi appendectomy. Look at the reality of Planned Parenthood, who funds it, what it does, what it does with the aborted babies, etc. It is not what it appears to be.
The loose definition you suggest and the practice of eugenics are not congruent, just like so many other abuses of words the PTB use to get away with taking over the world.
all good points. they were not just arrogant, but foolish in not understanding nature vs nurture, and their actions did untold damage. my point is the current bioweapon is not even remotely disguised as a false 'benevolence' -- it's just genocide.
I suppose you're against couples seeking genetic counseling when they have a known heritable disorder in their family lines?