noun
a person that controls access, as to information, often acting as an arbiter of quality or legitimacy:
an open internet allows innovators to bypass traditional gatekeepers and promote their work on its own merit.
a guardian; monitor
Deploy camouflage.
Drop all references re: 'Q' 'Qanon' etc. to avoid ban/termination _censorship install.
Why would anyone state that "Q sent us?" The first premise of the movement is to do research yourself. Once you come to your own conclusions the only thing Q did was to motivate at the beginning. Q did not SEND anyone. Q is like the hypothesis before the study. The Action comes from a mass of individuals who are clued up and armed with irrefutable information that they know where to find because they have done thousands of hours of legwork amongst the white papers and peer-reviewed works and know which sites are bogus.
On Sep 17 2020, Q instructed us anons to deploy camouflage and drop all references to Q and Qanon. (Q#4734).
Some people are not following Q's instructions. This is not about us or our egos this is about the plan to save the world.
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%234734
Q#4734
Focus on content [information].
Research for yourself.
gatekeeper
noun a person that controls access, as to information, often acting as an arbiter of quality or legitimacy: an open internet allows innovators to bypass traditional gatekeepers and promote their work on its own merit. a guardian; monitor
Deploy camouflage.
Drop all references re: 'Q' 'Qanon' etc. to avoid ban/termination _censorship install.
Algos [sniffers] bypass.
Keep charging, Midnight Riders!
[Revere's 'Midnight' Ride]
Delivery of free-information.
[bypass controlled media narrative].
Q
One
https://youtu.be/hbEZvQ1-4TE
Two
https://gab.com/Muzzik/posts/106230783050388003
Three
https://t.me/qanonplus/18155 (link to telegram)
Four
https://youtu.be/KYKOLwt8pwo?t=724 (timestamp)
Fact Vs. Fiction
great post!
Great point. I think it deserves its own post. I'm new and was unaware of that. It makes so much sense out of what's going on.
Showing neutrality while building a foundation for plausible deniability.
Next question.
When the SHTF 'Q' has to disappear. Makes sense?
Has Trump been making any Q references lately?
Just going from memory it seems like he loaded up on them in his earlier rallies this year but I read less about them in the later rallies.
I like devolution, I think it is quite possible that it is what happened, but why do people talk about it as if it's fact?
Q never mentioned devolution, not once.
Why would anyone state that "Q sent us?" The first premise of the movement is to do research yourself. Once you come to your own conclusions the only thing Q did was to motivate at the beginning. Q did not SEND anyone. Q is like the hypothesis before the study. The Action comes from a mass of individuals who are clued up and armed with irrefutable information that they know where to find because they have done thousands of hours of legwork amongst the white papers and peer-reviewed works and know which sites are bogus.
True, but if the Military acknowledges Q in any way they will be liable for EVERYTHING Q told us ..... and that opens a big can of worms no?
Liability?
My guess is, they won't even comment on it.
Riddle me this maestro. If a hobo poops in a rail car does that mean their was a goal post to begin with?