I have been going back and forth with someone on here and I realized that I really dont know where all these numbers the CDC reports comes from. Do they rely on Vaers, another systems, the death certificates created at the hospital? The numbers are obviously important and for some reason a very important tool, like Vaers, has been reported to only be 2% of actual events?
Comments (16)
sorted by:
People say that VAERS is unreliable, but they are verifiable reports mostly made by doctors. The application takes over 40 minutes to fill out, which, when drs are under pressure, means not many are made, I've seen estimates as low as 1% of cases. On the other hand, the Medicare records represent over 18% of the USA that collects insurance moneys. Claims are made, when a patient requires treatment, and vax status is recorded. The records are granular to the individual level and should be readable (with private identifying details redacted) by the public as many were forced onto the program: At least people should be able to gauge whether the program is working for them. However, it is hard to get those records.
And to be fair, I am not claiming the CDC numbers are wrong, Dr's I follow are claiming that. You and I can just go off of what's available, I get that. Not fighting, just trying to find the truth.
Why is is so difficult to get these records? I have heard another doctor state that hospital are not being transparent with their records.. I imagine it's the same records your speaking of.
VAERS current numbers are total BS. They edit the numbers sometimes multiple times in a single day.
I sent my sister a video link because she was arguing current reporting numbers, the video was live presentation of a doctor who had a slide presentation with VAERS screen shots from many months ago which was so much larger than what VAERS says today. I have also seen videos of a guy who was tracking their changes daily. They literally were changing individual case numbers and removing deaths and editing them to completely say other things.
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/en/vaccines/vaccinereport.pdf
I am not that great at digging like the Anons here but I would not be surprised if Vaers was funded by big pharma. This way they can manipulate numbers easily.
There are multiple systems. VAERs is the only one thats fully accessible publicly. There is the Medicare database that Steve Kirsch had access to. There are other databases that are very expensive, but I do believe there is a very sophisticated tracking system that the vaxx manufacturers use internally to keep track of their "experimentation".
As for the VAERs, the under-reporting factor I have heard anywhere from 10x to 100x. Using the anaphylaxis as a baseline, someone proved that it was around 50x under-reported.
Numbers are important.. so the big question is how accurate are the CDC numbers?
The official numbers of CDC? I would be bold enough to say completely manipulated.
The numbers from CDC are BS.
I feel your pain but I think the problem is we are small fish and we can only rely on what we can get our hands on.
Don't rely on CDC numbers.
Its less than 1% according to vaers themselves.
Thanks for the link
Well if anything I'm guessing it's over reported because anyone can report any side effect on there or any health issue whether it's vaccine related or not it even states that on the website.
I was wondering about that. I just went to the website and it appears that your right.. so why are they reporting that it is under reported?