Q said the moon landings were real, but I think at the very least the footage was faked. Assuming the moon landings are true, I'd say that NASA needed to have at least a plan to show footage of something for the people at home on TV because it would be rather lame for them to go all the way to the moon, only to find out that the video transmission failed. Just an idea.
Yet some people want you to believe (((they))) can control the weather with HAARP which cost a mere $290 million to build, or "portals to hell" with CERN, chem-trails... the list goes on.
All conceived to distract you from the Real conspiracies. To make you feel like Alice, tumbling down the rabbit hole.
Same. I still need to apologize to a friend I laughed at for suggesting it was faked.
Q said the moon landings were real, but I think at the very least the footage was faked. Assuming the moon landings are true, I'd say that NASA needed to have at least a plan to show footage of something for the people at home on TV because it would be rather lame for them to go all the way to the moon, only to find out that the video transmission failed. Just an idea.
The footage is real.
Consider the technology of the time. Apollo's computers were technologically equivalent to a pocket calculator. - https://www.thevintagenews.com/2017/03/27/the-computer-which-landed-apollo-11-on-the-moon-was-about-as-powerful-as-a-contemporary-pocket-calculator/
Yet some people want you to believe (((they))) can control the weather with HAARP which cost a mere $290 million to build, or "portals to hell" with CERN, chem-trails... the list goes on.
All conceived to distract you from the Real conspiracies. To make you feel like Alice, tumbling down the rabbit hole.
Misery loves company. Focus on Reality.
How do you know?
How do you not?
https://files.catbox.moe/j4vpca.png
Seriously, shoot me some bunk, I'll go over it with you.
How do you know?