💥 BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Terrifies Pro-Abortion Left With ONE Opening Question 💥
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
If someone can be charged with double murder for killing a pregnant woman, doesn't the law imply that there are two people?
Great point.
And if the baby is a girl, when does that woman's right to choose start? Isn't it her body, her choice too?
It's good to poke holes in their logic, but it just leads to male genocide.
For the record, I think baby boys deserve to choose life too.
When women say "they have the right to choose for themselves and my body my choice" I like to remind them if they believe that, then all women should be able to choose for themselves and that includes their baby girls.
Life begins at conception. All Embryos Matter.
/u/#correct
BLM. . .Babies Lives Matter!
In many countries male fetuses are the ones kept, and females aborted, it seems. And remember when China was routinely killing girl babies when born, injecting their brains through the fontanel, with a lethal substance.
Additionally, another question would be, “if the baby feels pain in the process, does the mother also feel that pain?” Answer: No “when the baby dies in the process, does the mother also die?” Answer: No. So, if the mother does not feel the pain inflicted on the baby’s body or suffer the death of the baby’s body, then……guess what assholes?!
ITS NOT THE MOTHER’S BODY AT ISSUE
Not your body, not your choice.
especially when they can decide their gender when they are old enough to talk
Good point. Example: Lacey Peterson and Scott Peterson.
I thought i read that the Peterson law, named after Scott Peterson killed his wife and unborn child, never made it onto the books. Reason being that the democrats knew it could be used against them and their pro choice stance.