Agreed. He was coherent and concise, used plain language, made it clear he's not a "follower" of anyone but Jesus, that Q is not a guru or god, used the expression "Q observer" which I think is as good as my "Q student" designation I've been using. Where Q is concerned we're just observers, analysts, researchers, and students: not followers, acolytes, or believers.
I think he was extremely lucid and clear, what are you struggling with?
Agreed. He was coherent and concise, used plain language, made it clear he's not a "follower" of anyone but Jesus, that Q is not a guru or god, used the expression "Q observer" which I think is as good as my "Q student" designation I've been using. Where Q is concerned we're just observers, analysts, researchers, and students: not followers, acolytes, or believers.