my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information
You're welcome to your position.
"Open to all sources of information" implies that all sources are equal, and that all forms of information are equal. They are not.
Information messages contain a variety of components (elements). They include the external aspect - the 'information' content - ideas, concepts, thought constructs - but they also include an internal aspect - the 'purpose' content - the intent, origin, direction and objective with which the info aspect is created and then released.
This is how seduction, deception, manipulation work. A manipulator can release factually correct information while the purpose, intent, is to swindle, deceive, ultimately, and gain an unlawful or immoral control or influence over the recipient.
Am I open to all sources of information? Absolutely not. "Open to all sources of information" is the siren song of the Satanists, the Luciferians, and their ilk. "Lucifer deserves a proper hearing, he has been improperly excluded"
This is always how the Marxists, the Communists, and their kind also operate.
This is also how shiesters, tricksters, and those whose motive, whether they know it themselves or not, are ego-centered, selfish, and driven by a selfish purpose.
Curious that you chose to descend into mockery, attack, and a money-driven projection in order to drive your point home. Curious indeed.
"There is a solid contingent of people on this sub are vehemently opposed..."
Curious that you opt for the victim mentality. "Vehemently opposed"? You give yourself far too much importance here.
The truth is: There is a solid contingent in GAW who don't give a crap about AS, and who know shills and bulldust when they see it.
im not going to waste much debating with you because youre clearly not arguing in good faith. nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. so lets try this a different way-
Austin steinbart has put out tons of factual information with sources to back it up
there are a lot of people on GAW that will try to convince you not to look at that information
the reasons they give for that position are weak eg "you might be manipulated emotionally, like the satanists and communists do to people using the truth!"
other people who provide no proprietary information, incorrect decodes, useless prognistication (like praying medic, Jordan Sather, x22, dustin nemos) do not experience the same objection from the people against steinbart even though they all have a financial stake in what they do and Austin does not (didnt q post about people profiting off this movement?)
My humor is an attempt to make people see this. "Ignore the guy giving free, provable information so you can donate to some people who give you nothing!"
what victim mentality? this comment thread is proof of what im saying. Any time anyone mentions Austin steinbart, theres a flood of downvotes and comments warning people he's a larp & to stay away. Strangely enough, none of these comments will touch on the information he shares, and if I attempt to initiate a dialogue with them about it, they ignore/deflect and tell me something about victim mentality. sound familiar?
What is Delta 6? What was McCains role in D6? Does US intelligence traffic drugs and children? Do they use the southern border? What corridor do they use in Yuma? What is the purpose of the Wall? What is MI6? What is the Treaty of Tordesillas? What does this have to do with the Queen Elizabeth? What is House Of Wettin?
I appreciate that. Let me know when you're finished?
because you're clearly not arguing in good faith.
Wait. Was I arguing with you? I don't think so. I was responding to your comment.
I have no interest in arguing this issue or any other for that matter.
Was I responding in good faith? What's YOUR definition of "good faith"? I responded in good faith - honestly, based on my own views, no intent to manipulate.
I've spent some time looking at Mr Steinbart. I'll do a heavy pass.
I do not spend my time attempting to convince people to "not look at that information". People can do what they want. If you have an issue with others trying to "convince others to not looking at ...", I suggest you take it up with them.
See 2 above. I have no interest in trying to "convince people to not look at ...." If you are somehow conflating my response with your assertion that some people (?) try to convince others not to look (?) because "you might be manipulated emotionally...", well, I appreciate that, because its a straight forward confirmation of my original evaluation of where you are coming from.
If in fact you somehow raised your point 3. in reference to MY comments, well, without being condescending, I have to say, you've 100% misinterpreted my comments.
But to make it clear: I have no interest in AS or in pursuing what AS offers, because I am already convinced from what I DO know that he is full of BS, or that whatever he's selling, frankly, I'm not interested.
You are complaining again, and drawing comparisons that do not enhance your argument, but which undermine it. Grow up.
No comment.
"What victim mentality?" Ah, OK. Hey, its been ok.
I know that you simply cannot see it, but your neediness, your attachment, and your emotionally distorted energy comes through like a loudspeaker. I do hope you find your way.
You're welcome to your position.
"Open to all sources of information" implies that all sources are equal, and that all forms of information are equal. They are not.
Information messages contain a variety of components (elements). They include the external aspect - the 'information' content - ideas, concepts, thought constructs - but they also include an internal aspect - the 'purpose' content - the intent, origin, direction and objective with which the info aspect is created and then released.
This is how seduction, deception, manipulation work. A manipulator can release factually correct information while the purpose, intent, is to swindle, deceive, ultimately, and gain an unlawful or immoral control or influence over the recipient.
Am I open to all sources of information? Absolutely not. "Open to all sources of information" is the siren song of the Satanists, the Luciferians, and their ilk. "Lucifer deserves a proper hearing, he has been improperly excluded"
This is always how the Marxists, the Communists, and their kind also operate.
This is also how shiesters, tricksters, and those whose motive, whether they know it themselves or not, are ego-centered, selfish, and driven by a selfish purpose.
Curious that you chose to descend into mockery, attack, and a money-driven projection in order to drive your point home. Curious indeed.
Curious that you opt for the victim mentality. "Vehemently opposed"? You give yourself far too much importance here.
The truth is: There is a solid contingent in GAW who don't give a crap about AS, and who know shills and bulldust when they see it.
im not going to waste much debating with you because youre clearly not arguing in good faith. nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. so lets try this a different way-
Austin steinbart has put out tons of factual information with sources to back it up
there are a lot of people on GAW that will try to convince you not to look at that information
the reasons they give for that position are weak eg "you might be manipulated emotionally, like the satanists and communists do to people using the truth!"
other people who provide no proprietary information, incorrect decodes, useless prognistication (like praying medic, Jordan Sather, x22, dustin nemos) do not experience the same objection from the people against steinbart even though they all have a financial stake in what they do and Austin does not (didnt q post about people profiting off this movement?)
My humor is an attempt to make people see this. "Ignore the guy giving free, provable information so you can donate to some people who give you nothing!"
what victim mentality? this comment thread is proof of what im saying. Any time anyone mentions Austin steinbart, theres a flood of downvotes and comments warning people he's a larp & to stay away. Strangely enough, none of these comments will touch on the information he shares, and if I attempt to initiate a dialogue with them about it, they ignore/deflect and tell me something about victim mentality. sound familiar?
What is Delta 6? What was McCains role in D6? Does US intelligence traffic drugs and children? Do they use the southern border? What corridor do they use in Yuma? What is the purpose of the Wall? What is MI6? What is the Treaty of Tordesillas? What does this have to do with the Queen Elizabeth? What is House Of Wettin?
I appreciate that. Let me know when you're finished?
Wait. Was I arguing with you? I don't think so. I was responding to your comment.
I have no interest in arguing this issue or any other for that matter.
Was I responding in good faith? What's YOUR definition of "good faith"? I responded in good faith - honestly, based on my own views, no intent to manipulate.
I've spent some time looking at Mr Steinbart. I'll do a heavy pass.
I do not spend my time attempting to convince people to "not look at that information". People can do what they want. If you have an issue with others trying to "convince others to not looking at ...", I suggest you take it up with them.
See 2 above. I have no interest in trying to "convince people to not look at ...." If you are somehow conflating my response with your assertion that some people (?) try to convince others not to look (?) because "you might be manipulated emotionally...", well, I appreciate that, because its a straight forward confirmation of my original evaluation of where you are coming from.
If in fact you somehow raised your point 3. in reference to MY comments, well, without being condescending, I have to say, you've 100% misinterpreted my comments.
But to make it clear: I have no interest in AS or in pursuing what AS offers, because I am already convinced from what I DO know that he is full of BS, or that whatever he's selling, frankly, I'm not interested.
You are complaining again, and drawing comparisons that do not enhance your argument, but which undermine it. Grow up.
No comment.
"What victim mentality?" Ah, OK. Hey, its been ok.
I know that you simply cannot see it, but your neediness, your attachment, and your emotionally distorted energy comes through like a loudspeaker. I do hope you find your way.
I doubt you know much about him. Cheers.
Yep. But as much as I want.
Cheers to you, too.