Holy crap. That was one of the theories in the beginning of all this that I dismissed as far fetched. I wonder if it had anything to do with that concert recently where people were dropping dead and squishing eachother.
5G is a protocol that will use high frequency bands and extensive bandwidths of the electromagnetic spectrum in the vast radiofrequency range from 600 MHz to nearly 100 GHz, which includes millimeter waves (>20 GHz), in addition to the currently used third generation (3G) and fourth generation (4G) long-term evolution (LTE) microwave bands. 5G frequency spectrum allocations differ from country to country. Focused pulsed beams of radiation will emit from new base stations and phased array antennas placed close to buildings whenever persons access the 5G network. Because these high frequencies are strongly absorbed by the atmosphere and especially during rain, a transmitter’s range is limited to 300 meters. Therefore, 5G requires base stations and antennas to be much more closely spaced than previous generations. Plus, satellites in space will emit 5G bands globally to create a wireless worldwide web. The new system therefore requires significant densification of 4G infrastructure as well as new 5G antennas that may dramatically increase the population’s WCR exposure both inside structures and outdoors. Approximately 100,000 emitting satellites are planned to be launched into orbit.This infrastructure will significantly alter the world’s electromagnetic environment to unprecedented levels and may cause unknown consequences to the entire biosphere, including humans.The new infrastructure will service the new 5G devices, including 5G mobile phones, routers, computers, tablets, self-driving vehicles, machine-to-machine communications, and the Internet of Things.
Let's apply some logical questioning to try to come to a reasonable assumption:
If the satellites were limited in the way terrestrial antennas/transmitters are, why would there be 100,000 satellites emitting the same frequencies back towards the earth? If they could not serve their purpose, why would that be their purpose?
i'M pReTtY sUrE they don't have the same limitations since they're there doing that, so far far far far away (a smidge outside 300m). Could it be a regulation difference between terrestrial and space equipment? I would think it has to do with signal/frequency density. BECAUSE they're so far away, they can turn the dial up as the frequency disperses and weakens as it passes through the atmosphere.
Stand right beside a 5G antenna for a month and tell me about your health... if you can at that point.
Then again, maybe space is fake and 5G satellites in space is code for something else.
I can't stand beside a 5G antenna, as there are none around me, and I don't expect there to be any in the future. I could travel to one, but I'm surely not going to stand on a street corner just for your silly experiment.
The frequencies used by 5G have all been used for decades for multiple purposes. The problem with 5G is not the frequencies. It's the fact that higher frequencies are capable of carrying much more information. That is what makes the internet of things possible. Even your refrigerator will spy on you and report what you're eating to your insurance company.
Therefore, I don't have smart devices. All of my appliances are dumb, I have no TV at all, and I don't use a smart phone. The "smart grid" can't even get me, as I do a lot of electronic things by battery or solar power.
You should learn more about how frequency and frequency density can affect the human body on the cellular level. It will help make sense of my comment.
Keep fighting the good fight and have a great day, fren.
Spit balling here; is it possible that people were suffering from exposure to EMFs which they then blamed on covid and then the jab is rumoured to make people more receptive to EMF (I think)--could that then be creating a situation where we have an exacerbated version of the first problem plus whatever other nasties are in the jab.
Again, just trying to make sense of all this without being an expert.
On May 15, 2019, US President Donald Trump declared a national emergency, signing an executive order banning US companies and government agencies from utilizing telecommunications equipment that pose a risk to national security. While the initial announcement did not mention Huawei by name, members of congress didn't hesitate to reference the massive Chinese company directly.
Font looks off. Some of it show a blurry character and some are clear and crisp. First whole line looks blurry and the second line looks clear. Maybe my pc.
Wireless router 5G is NOT the same as cell phone 5G.
Wireless router "5G" is literally 5Ghz frequency (as apposed to the older 2.4Ghz freq).
This is NOT the same as the cell phone "5G" which is using 60Ghz (or higher).
The "5G" used to label cell tech is "5th Generation" (as opposed to older 4G which is "4th Generation), and, has NOTHING to do with the frequency being used.
Well that qualifies as a boom i think
Archive and spread to the mouth agaped yokels
Holy crap. That was one of the theories in the beginning of all this that I dismissed as far fetched. I wonder if it had anything to do with that concert recently where people were dropping dead and squishing eachother.
Good point about AstroWorld. Those young people more than anyone else would have the new 5g phones
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/
Sauce
"... a transmitter's range is limited to 300 meters."
This means that many people in rural areas will never get 5G because their houses are too far from the road.
I don't get 4G in my area and barely get 3G.
That may be the point of the 100,000 satellites.
I'm pretty sure the satellites will be more than 300 meters away. I still don't think I'll get any 5G at my house.
Let's apply some logical questioning to try to come to a reasonable assumption:
If the satellites were limited in the way terrestrial antennas/transmitters are, why would there be 100,000 satellites emitting the same frequencies back towards the earth? If they could not serve their purpose, why would that be their purpose?
i'M pReTtY sUrE they don't have the same limitations since they're there doing that, so far far far far away (a smidge outside 300m). Could it be a regulation difference between terrestrial and space equipment? I would think it has to do with signal/frequency density. BECAUSE they're so far away, they can turn the dial up as the frequency disperses and weakens as it passes through the atmosphere.
Stand right beside a 5G antenna for a month and tell me about your health... if you can at that point.
Then again, maybe space is fake and 5G satellites in space is code for something else.
I can't stand beside a 5G antenna, as there are none around me, and I don't expect there to be any in the future. I could travel to one, but I'm surely not going to stand on a street corner just for your silly experiment.
The frequencies used by 5G have all been used for decades for multiple purposes. The problem with 5G is not the frequencies. It's the fact that higher frequencies are capable of carrying much more information. That is what makes the internet of things possible. Even your refrigerator will spy on you and report what you're eating to your insurance company.
Therefore, I don't have smart devices. All of my appliances are dumb, I have no TV at all, and I don't use a smart phone. The "smart grid" can't even get me, as I do a lot of electronic things by battery or solar power.
You should learn more about how frequency and frequency density can affect the human body on the cellular level. It will help make sense of my comment.
Keep fighting the good fight and have a great day, fren.
all by design
Another conspiracy theory proven true...
Spit balling here; is it possible that people were suffering from exposure to EMFs which they then blamed on covid and then the jab is rumoured to make people more receptive to EMF (I think)--could that then be creating a situation where we have an exacerbated version of the first problem plus whatever other nasties are in the jab.
Again, just trying to make sense of all this without being an expert.
Here's something else to consider
2003 3G was deployed. SARS epidemic
2009 4G was deployed. H1N1 epidemic
2019 5G was deployed. COVID 19 pandemic
Yeah, definitely interesting. Guessing you've been through that thread on pol?
Yep, interesting stuff
I haven't read the whole thing and I've just clicked on this which I'm yet to read but it looks quite interesting, might be worth a dig.
WCR = ?
Page 1 sauce link
Wireless Communication Radiation
Reason GEOTUS saved the US from Huwei
Font looks off. Some of it show a blurry character and some are clear and crisp. First whole line looks blurry and the second line looks clear. Maybe my pc.
Then click the source link its word for word the same
Wireless router 5G is NOT the same as cell phone 5G.
Wireless router "5G" is literally 5Ghz frequency (as apposed to the older 2.4Ghz freq).
This is NOT the same as the cell phone "5G" which is using 60Ghz (or higher).
The "5G" used to label cell tech is "5th Generation" (as opposed to older 4G which is "4th Generation), and, has NOTHING to do with the frequency being used.