Lin Wood is a patriot! F Tucker
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Okay... fair enough... but, this is from 2014. Any chance Tucker was unaware at that time about Hunter and the Biden syndicate? I'm not trying to sound naive. A more recent piece of evidence would have been better.
I agree. Tucker is still at Fox though. So I mean he should have already moved on to Newsmax or OAN. I’m just proud of Lin Wood putting this out for us to research.
No kidding... he is a catalyst at the very least, and we need more catalytic agents.
Regarding Tucker at Fox... yes, I agree about Fox being part of the evil side. But, if you're Tucker and you've got access to those who watch MSM via Fox, and you are a really a "good guy", you wouldn't want to give up the access to those who might not follow you to your own platform. While staying with Fox you're able to red-pill those who watch MSM, and your message still gets picked up by those who hate the MSM. So, you suffer being called a whore, but you're not there to be liked... you're there to get the word out to an audience that needs to be red-pilled. And, of course, you're getting paid a lot.
I'm not trying to defend TC... but rather, I'm trying to stay hopeful. It seems like I've had to resort to the "great actors" comment by Q more and more often as of late.
The actors are so good you might even believe they are genuine. Get real. This is the same Tucker who walked back the Hunter Biden Laptop story a week before the election? If you are MSM you are alphabet ran.
God bless.
I appreciate that. But i'm not 100 percent convinced. Maybe 88 percent.
I see what you’re saying. Maybe I’m misjudging him a little harsh. I think I’m a few weeks we will know more.
And I could be totally wrong and bamboozled. I've always thought (and said) that this site is a perfect place to create a betting forum.
No one has any hard proof that Tucker is a bad guy. There is that possibility, yes. But you are correct in pointing these out. Anyone who assumes his prior connections implicate guilt, is no better than any dumb ass who assumes Trump is a pedophile just because of his Epstien connection.
You also correct in your assessment. Until Trump media is online and broadcasting, we don't have any other MSM avenues and unfortunately cable news is still a primary source of info for a lot of people. If I was in Tucker's spot, I would do exactly the same aside from accepting the rigged election. I would however be much more diplomatic and neutral about it as my job in that seat is to keep the red pill dispensary going and doing what I need to to stay there.
I don't trust him, but I also don't trust people outside my friend's group so that is what it is. He deserves praise when he gets it right and scorn when he doesn't. But to write him off completely isn't fair, impartial or rational.
Thanks for the further details. I agree.
Newsmax fired people for not taking the shot.
Yea OANN is the only real one out of them, NewsMax and Fox.
Don’t forget RSBN
scoffs in Epoch Times
OAN is practically irrelevant. They are good and they are a proper news service, but they are too small. Newsmax fired some of their correspondents for refusing the vax - meaning they are, at best, a smaller Fox. With those choices, he might as well stay where he is and keep reaching Fox audience with his red pills.
THIS
Nah