Distraction / nothingburger. Allocated funding can be re-earmarked and back-rolled into existing budgetary cycles due to unforeseen contingency expenditures. There is no evidence and no reason to believe the original funding was designated "Covid 19" at that time, not to mention that would have made zero sense to anyone at the time and would simply raise too many questions that would only continue to be raised as 2020 unfolded.
Here is my challenge to you. Tell me what you propose to be the course of action that will free our world from the grips of evil, that does not involve Q.
Why do people always "challenge" people to provide solutions they themselves have zero intention of even attempting to think of themselves?
Critical thinking requires you provide counter-solutions to your own. Steelman them so to speak.
Someone who "challenges" you to do this without providing ANY evidence they've attempted to do this themselves isn't arguing in good faith.
You've probably noticed the same error in thinking in people who argue for masks.
"I challenge you to provide evidence masks don't work." - said by a person who NEVER questioned it at all themselves and isn't arguing in good faith.
People who are do not ask questions in THAT WAY.
You're doing the intellectual equivalent of "debunking" as done in bad libtard science magazines.
I challenge YOU to think of a few ways YOURSELF.
And if those arguments are not convincing enough to yourself to AT LEAST enough to get you to have to think hard, you're doing a disservice to your own viewpoint which you could be making stronger and stronger.
Instead you're relying on ME and other internet randos to HOPEFULLY be smart enough to think of good steelmans for you.
And I don't know why the FUCK you would trust anyone but yourself to do that
We are here, in this site because we have exhausted every other possible way to defeat the evil and have learnt with our eyes open that this is the only way.
If you are making fun of the "Plan", then clearly you believe there is an alternative. Hence, it's on you to engage in a debate by providing the alternative.
But the very fact my simple question triggers you so much tells me much about you.
If you came here to shill then sorry to say that your career as a shill will be very short. If you came here to learn something, then sorry to say that you will probably not gain anything from this site. If you came here hoping to "teach" people here something with what you must consider is your superior intellect, it will be amusing to watch your frustration.
If you came here for anything else, well good luck finding what it is you are looking for. If you want to engage in productive conversations, you will find plenty here as long as you step down from that high horse!
Distraction / nothingburger. Allocated funding can be re-earmarked and back-rolled into existing budgetary cycles due to unforeseen contingency expenditures. There is no evidence and no reason to believe the original funding was designated "Covid 19" at that time, not to mention that would have made zero sense to anyone at the time and would simply raise too many questions that would only continue to be raised as 2020 unfolded.
Think this one through.
Nobody will think this through. As per the rules. We trust the plan.
Here is my challenge to you. Tell me what you propose to be the course of action that will free our world from the grips of evil, that does not involve Q.
That sounds like it would be a challenge to YOU.
Why do people always "challenge" people to provide solutions they themselves have zero intention of even attempting to think of themselves?
Critical thinking requires you provide counter-solutions to your own. Steelman them so to speak.
Someone who "challenges" you to do this without providing ANY evidence they've attempted to do this themselves isn't arguing in good faith.
You've probably noticed the same error in thinking in people who argue for masks.
"I challenge you to provide evidence masks don't work." - said by a person who NEVER questioned it at all themselves and isn't arguing in good faith.
People who are do not ask questions in THAT WAY.
You're doing the intellectual equivalent of "debunking" as done in bad libtard science magazines.
I challenge YOU to think of a few ways YOURSELF.
And if those arguments are not convincing enough to yourself to AT LEAST enough to get you to have to think hard, you're doing a disservice to your own viewpoint which you could be making stronger and stronger.
Instead you're relying on ME and other internet randos to HOPEFULLY be smart enough to think of good steelmans for you.
And I don't know why the FUCK you would trust anyone but yourself to do that
We are here, in this site because we have exhausted every other possible way to defeat the evil and have learnt with our eyes open that this is the only way.
If you are making fun of the "Plan", then clearly you believe there is an alternative. Hence, it's on you to engage in a debate by providing the alternative.
But the very fact my simple question triggers you so much tells me much about you.
If you came here to shill then sorry to say that your career as a shill will be very short. If you came here to learn something, then sorry to say that you will probably not gain anything from this site. If you came here hoping to "teach" people here something with what you must consider is your superior intellect, it will be amusing to watch your frustration.
If you came here for anything else, well good luck finding what it is you are looking for. If you want to engage in productive conversations, you will find plenty here as long as you step down from that high horse!
A blackpill shill on a fresh account doesn't qualify as "we".