The Lancet attempts to fall on their own sword, forgetting that the definition of a "lancet" is a "small, broad two-edged surgical knife or blade with a sharp point." Good luck saving yourselves! Your reputation bled out long ago as you stood by and said nothing while lockdowns destroyed our lives! - The Great Awakening

The Lancet attempts to fall on their own sword, forgetting that the definition of a "lancet" is a "small, broad two-edged surgical knife or blade with a sharp point." Good luck saving yourselves! Your reputation bled out long ago as you stood by and said nothing while lockdowns destroyed our lives! (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by catsfive 3 years ago by catsfive +439 / -0

52 comments download

52 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (52)

sorted by:

▲ 10 ▼

– Scorpion76 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Normally yes, but not when it comes to the most prestiges medical publication like the Lancet. They knew before they published it was fraudulent. No one should trust it as a source again.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– TrumpTrollMaster 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

In case you haven't realized, there are a bunch of medical professionals who are going down with the sinking ship and never changing their opinion.

I don't know about you but this is still miles better.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– KickingPugilist 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Well we can point to them now like leftists did before and sing "how ya like me now?"

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q