Actually, the dumbest people on the plane are brainwashed individuals like yourself that have no grasp of science other than as a religion, worthy of fervent defense and blind devotion.
Did you know there's no experiment that can pass through the scientific method that can prove either spherocity or motion of the earth?
Even if there were, science is only "settled" until more information comes along that disproves the previous theory.
I'll leave you a quote. Maybe you'll be more willing to have a better understanding of how science works from a cosmologist.
"People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observationsā¦ For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observationsā¦ You can only exclude it on philosophical groundsā¦ What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that."
George Ellis (cosmologist), āProfile: George F. R. Ellis,ā Scientific American, October 1995, Vol. 273, No.4, p. 55
Not religious for your first wrong answer. And you seem to think I believe in flat earth? Wrong again, not sure where you get the " no grasp of science", you obviously didn't read what I wrote.
Eclipses, the tides, the seasons - explain without science then?
Take a 10 gallon bucket. Hook it up to a drill. Turn drill on so it stays on and spins the bucket. After a few minutes throw some balls of different density ( size doesn't matter ) into the bucket.
After a few minutes what happens?
Read my below comments. "No grasp of science" lol The go to response for folks who actually have no grasp of science.
You're a complete religious zealot for your version of "science", obviously.
You mock, science questions.
You act like it is settled, real science is never settled.
You're invested in your belief system and your faith in your heigh preists that tell you what to think when they are practicing, at best, philosophy, not science.
Notice where I said "eclipses, the tides, the seasons" and asked to explain WITHOUT science how they exist? I'm asking for a "scientific explanation" of those examples from a flat earth point of view.
Show me how your flat earth belief explains an eclipse.
Show me how your flat earth belief explains the tidal system.
Show me how your flat earth belief explains seasons
Show me how your flat earth belief explains meteors
Show me how your flat earth belief explains how gravity is fake
All of those already don't work on the globe model.
Lol
I'd love to walk you through it, but over the last 7 years I've met plenty of cocky time wasters like yourself.
Join up on our discord, discord.gg/flatearth (24k members)
We'll be happy to walk you through it. Judging by these comments though, it'll probably take a while to break you out of your dunning Kruger state.
Actually, the dumbest people on the plane are brainwashed individuals like yourself that have no grasp of science other than as a religion, worthy of fervent defense and blind devotion.
Did you know there's no experiment that can pass through the scientific method that can prove either spherocity or motion of the earth?
Even if there were, science is only "settled" until more information comes along that disproves the previous theory.
I'll leave you a quote. Maybe you'll be more willing to have a better understanding of how science works from a cosmologist.
"People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observationsā¦ For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observationsā¦ You can only exclude it on philosophical groundsā¦ What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that."
George Ellis (cosmologist), āProfile: George F. R. Ellis,ā Scientific American, October 1995, Vol. 273, No.4, p. 55
Not religious for your first wrong answer. And you seem to think I believe in flat earth? Wrong again, not sure where you get the " no grasp of science", you obviously didn't read what I wrote.
Eclipses, the tides, the seasons - explain without science then?
Take a 10 gallon bucket. Hook it up to a drill. Turn drill on so it stays on and spins the bucket. After a few minutes throw some balls of different density ( size doesn't matter ) into the bucket.
After a few minutes what happens?
Read my below comments. "No grasp of science" lol The go to response for folks who actually have no grasp of science.
You're a complete religious zealot for your version of "science", obviously.
You mock, science questions. You act like it is settled, real science is never settled. You're invested in your belief system and your faith in your heigh preists that tell you what to think when they are practicing, at best, philosophy, not science.
You too? Not know how to read?
Notice where I said "eclipses, the tides, the seasons" and asked to explain WITHOUT science how they exist? I'm asking for a "scientific explanation" of those examples from a flat earth point of view.
Understand now?
All of those already don't work on the globe model. Lol I'd love to walk you through it, but over the last 7 years I've met plenty of cocky time wasters like yourself. Join up on our discord, discord.gg/flatearth (24k members) We'll be happy to walk you through it. Judging by these comments though, it'll probably take a while to break you out of your dunning Kruger state.