I keep seeing the question: Why is Trump taking credit for a vax that is killing people?
We have heard many explanations, including...
- He's in on it.
- He doesn't know the truth.
- He had to do it so we weren't locked down for 5 year.
- There are no deaths--that's all fake news from White Hats and the shots are saline (I heard this one just the other day).
- He has to sound like he still approves of it otherwise the media crushes him.
- A combination of the above.
Personally, I have always thought #5 was the most plausible explanation.
But my new thought is this: whoever smelt it, dealt it. Remember that from junior high? Same principle. Imagine if Trump came out against the vax and he highlighted the adverse effects. What would happen? He would be blamed. But by pretending to still praise it (while advocating for you to do your own research and make your own choice), he allows the blame to remain squarely on the pharmas and other bad actors. And if they try to blame him, he can say "All I did was clear the path to speed up the process... you're the ones who created poison."
He had to speed it up so they couldn't keep us locked down. And until he is back in the White House (which I still believe will happen), he must play "stupid".
Yes, people are dying and being maimed. But until Trump is in power and able to stop it, he can't do anything else except what he is doing. I have siad this before: I think his heart breaks anew each day that goes by that he is notable to stop it.
Thanks for reading. Have at it, Frens.
I didn't say he was evil and I'm only looking at what he says. The Alabama rally was not an interview, and all he had to do there was leave the jabs out of his speech.
Good point. So, new question: what's the chance that the vax is actually good (or just saline shots)... except for a handful of batches that were hijacked by the black hats??? I don't really think that. But, anything's possible at this point.
I doubt any batch of the vax is 'good', though some are apparently more immediately problematic than others. There have been reports that some only contained saline, including by a chemist who analyzed five different injections, three of which were saline only. I wouldn't want anything to do with what the other two contained.
Yeah, I think I am with you on all of that.
Do you ever think about the fact that we'll never know the truth? I mean, even if/when Trump is back, there isn't going to be a moment where the credits roll and we see who was playing what role. There won't be a "behind the scenes" DVD that explains it all.
There'll probably be some credits and some 'behind the scenes' DVDs, but I doubt they'll tell us everything.
I'm not sure Trump will be back. I believe NCSWISC, but I'm not sure the final outcome includes Trump as more than perhaps a senior statesman. Don't ask me who I think would take his place, though, as I have no idea. And it may be we get an outcome with an entirely different paradigm than we've known, and that includes the end of the two-party system. We may get a completely different form of government, and if I had my way it would entirely be that of trust based on truth and respect (horses live this paradigm, which is where I learned the beauty of it).
Can you think of any reason, or have you heard any Md worth their salt say, that suppressing a person's natural immune system is a "good thing"? Leaving them vulnerable not only to different kinds of coronaviruses, but also to formerly dormant diseases in their body like cancer? Look at all the toxic effects of spike proteins coursing through all jabbed peoples' bodies, crossing the blood/brain barrier, etc. This is the fundamental function of the mRNA technology in this "vaccine". Why would we have doctors and scientists saying the only conceivable purpose for this shot is a depopulation event?
Why would the entire DS/globalist cabal be going insane trying to jab every human being, down to infants, as fast as it can, for a "disease" that has a 99.9% survival rate? There is obviously a planned and adverse effect, or spectrum of effects, and it's highly likely that we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg so far.
Like I said in my comment... "I don't really think that." I am on the exact same page as you. You articulated the concerns very well.
Given my personal experience with family members very slim chance that most are saline or harmless. When this whole thing started I didn't know anyone who had died of covid. Since the jab roll out I know 2 people who died of covid both fully jabbed. Within 6 months of being jabbed My step dad had a heart attack with no clogged arteries. My sister developed breast cancer, uncle had a stroke, MIL Iost the use of her arm, my sisters FIL died 12 hours after the booster, my daughter's friend got 2 brain clots and had a stroke at 19, SIL father is now seeing a cardiologist and her mom was just found unresponsive in her house soooo I think the chances are low!
I haven't responded to anyone because I just wanted to be a catalyst for discussion. But, to you I want to say that I am sorry for all of the loss. I can't even imagine the devastating impact the loss has had. I hope you can find the strength to hang in there. I am so sorry.
Thank you friend. It's been a rough couple months that's for sure