Based on the ski jacket Epstein is wearing I would say mid-80’s. So it would put their off spring at around 20ish - that is if they didn’t ____(insert outcome here).
mid 80s would make this alleged child older than 20ish. I would say mid to late 30s - unless the pic is from the early 90s (Ghis's hair for some reason says 91 or 92 to me) then the alleged child would be late 20s, to early 30s.
This is going to come from way out in left field, but is there any chance the alleged child could be Rachel Chandler?
"She was born in 1988, but her origins are fairly hidden, and information is scarce. However, she is the daughter of the Chandler Family that owned the Los Angeles Times. Evidence shows that she was also raised in the world of Child Trafficking, and the name “Chandler” is used as code-word for “Child Handler".'
I don’t think this is implausible. Remember Chandler was in the security room at Epstein Island and posted the security camera footage on her Instagram? I’ve always thought she was much more than the “standard” pedo child recruiter to have the guts to do that.
Good observation. I bet DecodingSymbols.com would be able to shed some light on this. If memory serves, there was an explanation of "Friends" comms there.
The last name of "Chandler/C-handler" is just too convenient, which makes me wonder if that isn't really her last name -- it was just useful for comms. If you were Epstein's daughter, you could hardly go around with that as your last name. In hindsight, it would have been a smart move, as the NXIVM crew all got caught. Best not to leave any trails that would tie back to someone else.
Don't forget, too, that Epstein entertained the idea at one point that he wanted to impregnate a boatload of women to spread his DNA out to the world. This seems to fit in with the rest of the narrative.
Conversely, I am now wondering whether the photo is strictly for Comms - picture implying they are with child - new op in the works perhaps? I am now more curious as to the year the photo was taken. :D LMAO.
Based on the ski jacket Epstein is wearing I would say mid-80’s. So it would put their off spring at around 20ish - that is if they didn’t ____(insert outcome here).
mid 80s would make this alleged child older than 20ish. I would say mid to late 30s - unless the pic is from the early 90s (Ghis's hair for some reason says 91 or 92 to me) then the alleged child would be late 20s, to early 30s.
This is going to come from way out in left field, but is there any chance the alleged child could be Rachel Chandler?
"She was born in 1988, but her origins are fairly hidden, and information is scarce. However, she is the daughter of the Chandler Family that owned the Los Angeles Times. Evidence shows that she was also raised in the world of Child Trafficking, and the name “Chandler” is used as code-word for “Child Handler".'
https://www.dark2light.net/epsteingate-1/lf4nyvbvo7kux1s3hwm9aiwen05dn8
There's an awful lot of overlap between her and Epstein/Maxwell.
I don’t think this is implausible. Remember Chandler was in the security room at Epstein Island and posted the security camera footage on her Instagram? I’ve always thought she was much more than the “standard” pedo child recruiter to have the guts to do that.
u/#q3147
Good observation. I bet DecodingSymbols.com would be able to shed some light on this. If memory serves, there was an explanation of "Friends" comms there.
The last name of "Chandler/C-handler" is just too convenient, which makes me wonder if that isn't really her last name -- it was just useful for comms. If you were Epstein's daughter, you could hardly go around with that as your last name. In hindsight, it would have been a smart move, as the NXIVM crew all got caught. Best not to leave any trails that would tie back to someone else.
Don't forget, too, that Epstein entertained the idea at one point that he wanted to impregnate a boatload of women to spread his DNA out to the world. This seems to fit in with the rest of the narrative.
Look at this link. Full of research on this connection/or lack of: https://jewelyblue.com/rachel-chandler-epstein-child-trafficking
I'd also say late 80s, early 90s.
Correct my daughter was born in 91 and she’s 30. Came here to say this
Conversely, I am now wondering whether the photo is strictly for Comms - picture implying they are with child - new op in the works perhaps? I am now more curious as to the year the photo was taken. :D LMAO.
If born in 91, then the possible Epstein child would turn 33 in 2024.
I don't know anything about Irish math, but I've got kids born around the mid-90's older than 20ish.
🤣🤣🤣 that’s why the Irish look so young!
I'm in 84 and 37...the grainy pic looks more like early 90s possibly. The 80s pics had more of a weird tint to them.
Are you really this stupid, or are you just a troll trying to make us look bad?
It was a mistake you friggen idiot