You are just being sarcastic. None of the items you enumerate are either murder or an excuse for murder. You completely duck the medical and legal fact that the fetus is a separate individual. (There is no point to quibbling over "utilitarian" arguments, when the argument for abortion is only utilitarian. My point is that there can be no utilitarian arguments.)
Since time immemorial, infanticide has been practiced. That rather eliminates "time immemorial" from the status of an authority figure.
If Roe vs. Wade is set aside, we return to the status quo ante, which was for the issue to be determined by the individual states through legislation. Just as the issue of homicide is determined.
You say it is not your choice to make. I would agree, in the sense that It is no one's choice to make, as murder is not an allowable "option." But in a larger sense, the opinions of society at large cannot be dismissed as irrelevant---any more than they would be if you or I or anyone were to walk past an alley and see someone in the act of murdering someone else. Murder is not a "private affair" of the murderer, such that no one else should interfere. Murder is a very individual crime against humanity, and all humanity has an interest in preventing it. Women who want to murder (for convenience or any other motive) are not admirable or honorable people.
You are just being sarcastic. None of the items you enumerate are either murder or an excuse for murder. You completely duck the medical and legal fact that the fetus is a separate individual. (There is no point to quibbling over "utilitarian" arguments, when the argument for abortion is only utilitarian. My point is that there can be no utilitarian arguments.)
Since time immemorial, infanticide has been practiced. That rather eliminates "time immemorial" from the status of an authority figure.
If Roe vs. Wade is set aside, we return to the status quo ante, which was for the issue to be determined by the individual states through legislation. Just as the issue of homicide is determined.
You say it is not your choice to make. I would agree, in the sense that It is no one's choice to make, as murder is not an allowable "option." But in a larger sense, the opinions of society at large cannot be dismissed as irrelevant---any more than they would be if you or I or anyone were to walk past an alley and see someone in the act of murdering someone else. Murder is not a "private affair" of the murderer, such that no one else should interfere. Murder is a very individual crime against humanity, and all humanity has an interest in preventing it. Women who want to murder (for convenience or any other motive) are not admirable or honorable people.
Excuse me? Sarcasm? Are you touched in the head?
No. Argument that you couldn't answer to. Thanks for trying to divert with insults.