Re-read the 3 articles in the OP from SLAG since it's been several months. Great stuff. Well reasoned analysis. However, the big thing that I disagree with, is the painting of these entire event as a "war" or an "invasion" is if with and by a foreign nation, which he suggests was China. Instead, I see this even as a rebellion and insurrection aided by foreign actors, but not necessarily by the official governments of the countries in which said actors reside. For instance, Russians could have been aiding and abetting, but not Russia. Chinese but not China. Ukrainians but not Ukraine. British but not the UK. Etc etc. The real occupying enemy though, is domestic. This is a rebellion, an insurrection, with traitors galore. This circumstance would trigger all of the same fail safes as described in the articles, but think it's an essential distinction for identifying the true enemies and the extent to which they've been supported, by whom and for what purpose, which I agree is far more reaching than just a takeover of the USA, but complete global domination.... RISK. They want the public to ponder that the enemy is China, or Iran, or Russia. Then they get us to push for war against that entire nation and cause global nuclear holocaust... think, WWI on steriods. We've seen this fictionalized in movies like The Sum of All Fears, Hunt For Red October, Crimson Tide, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, Wonder Woman and most recently The King's Man. The real dark, secret global armies without true national allegiance, pull the strings around the world to get the powers to blame each other and start hot wars with each other... to create "conventional" world wars... but none of this is conventional, it's unconventional, a new type of warfare and yet one that's been used for the entire history of human civilization.

JFK knew... and was eliminated for trying to do something about it.

When I hear "wholly" I actually hear "HOLY"... makes me think of this Derren Brown tactic. Indeed... biblical.

Have you followed my recent exchanges with v8power re the expansion of the role of the VP? Do you also find it coincidental that arguably the first major legal assessment in American History, regarding the VP's role in Executive affairs happened only a month before the Bay of Pigs? Is it possible that already in 1961, the path was being laid to get LBJ more involved because some decided there needed to be a regime change in the USA due to the threat posed by Kennedy? Have you ever thought about the fact that most Americans hardly ever think about the VP, and even less so throughout history up until more recent elections? Pundits speculate about how much of an impact the VP selection makes on voters' decision making process. It's almost the butt of a joke... oh shoot, do we want this person as the backup? Until Tippicannoe and Tyler too, there was little concern about the VP. There was also limited campaigning. That election changed both of these norms, especially after the suspicious death of WHH that allowed for His Ascendancy John Tyler to quite literally, steal the presidency. If Gen Zach Taylor wasn't a war hero, he'd have never been allowed by the slave powers to win... but there was Fillmore [strategically?] as backup... another perfect puppet after Taylor's similarly suspicious death. Andrew Johnson (mess of Reconstruction), Chester Arthur (start of American imperialism)... Teddy Roosevelt and Coolidge seem to be the only 2 backups that ended up being upgrades to fill vacancies. Truman? LBJ? Barf. Were HW Bush and Cheney strategic backups in case Reagan and W refused to play ball? Odd how much more involved many VPs have been starting with LBJ? Here we had Trump, [unconstitutionally] delegating away, at least to an extent, exclusive military power of POTUS in heading up the Space Force creation... ironically, the DS's tactics used against them....

Perhaps I'm trying too hard to make something out of nothing, but Norman was very interested in Pence, the Space Force comments with Miller, and the EEOB. I can help but think that this all ties together with Devolution and shadow government.