What if they were vetted by the Q team, and put in place. Now the white hats are completely pulling their strings to control 'devolution'. You'll notice that they go liberal on everything pushing us closer to 'the precipice' ..... EXCEPT 2A.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
It is illegal to use a legal name.
"The Law
The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!
If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral duty requires me to call the attention of my fellow-citizens to it."
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. It's a pure rant without nuance. All laws are weapons for every kind of greed? That's not true. Some laws are used for abuse, but it's not the "laws", it's the people. You can have the best written laws on the books, but if they aren't enforce they're meaningless. Same is true of badly written laws.
The perversion is how democratic states and cities choose to enforce one law to hurt the citizens, but not another.
The law is not the problem. You've got the wrong target. What's do you do when a leftist mayor in Seattle refuses to enforce laws against looting? That's not a problem of the "law". That's a problem of enforcement.
Choose your target. Think logically.
Also "if this is true". If what is true? Do you mean the post above? It's only a theory. I wouldn't waste emotional energy getting upset over hypotheticals. That's like saying, "I hypothetically had my wallet stolen by my friend and I hate them for that." For... what? Are you sure they did it or are you only speculating?
Lol, read some Bastiat dude..