Bullshit. Thats a LiPo fire as the battery probably failed on impact. Drone probably lost signal and fell out of the sky. Hardly a conspiracy or proof cell towers can "melt drones".
So lost signal, but retains camera feed? Right, how is the camera feed transmitted? And you can't think of any other cause of the battery fire? And you've used the word conspiracy wrong. The correct word is theory.
I have a drone, that if it loses signal it will return to the take off point. This isn't the case for all drones. It is a little strange that the blades just stopped though
5G frequencies are on the edge of and overlap into microwave territory. Exposure is a significant health risk. Ever hike up near the big microwave repeater towers? Read the warning of death by being too close to the tower signs?
Nah. Nothing to see here. Until the cancer shows up.
The higher the frequency, the more easily it is absorbed by stuff hence a chain of amplifiers is required to get the signal where it needs to go.
To that end, if you get too close to an amplifier, you can get hit with a high blast of RF hence why they are positioned so high up from where humans are.
I’ve noticed a lot of antennas very low to ground, under 25’, not sure what band. Also antenna mounted to residential apartment buildings where the adjacent buildings are very close. Can’t be good
The other way they solve the issue of high freq frying people is they turn down the wattage. That means you have to get the antenna closer though. The problem with this drone footage is they flew up near a high output high frequency area. Any tiny little weakness in that cheep drone and it was almost guaranteed to fall out of the sky. Take the drones battery pack, toss it in the microwave, and set it to 2 min on power setting 2-3. That's what they just did.
NOTE... I'm not saying its safe. I have my doubts about any of this shit being safe.
Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous system attack is of great concern.
Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that make us functionally different from single celled creatures are our nervous system and our endocrine systems – even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. Thus, the consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems is immense, such that it is a travesty to ignore these findings.
Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially all chronic diseases.
Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single strand and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These in turn produce cancer and also mutations in germ line cells which produce mutations in future generations.
Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.
Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.
Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+] and excessive calcium signaling.
Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15 different mechanisms during cancer causation.
There is also a substantial literature showing that EMFs are associated with other effects including
life threatening cardiac effects.
very early onset dementias, including Alzheimer’s, digital and other types of dementias
EMF exposures in utero and shortly after birth may cause ADHD and autism
I know people around here arent so warm to the hippy dippy stuff but if you want protection from the harmful radiation buy a mineral called shungite, there are video online of the EMF numbers being cut significantly from it. Buy some big rocks and put it around for WIFI router and itll help protect you.
Yeah, I've always wondered about that, especially now that I have a 5G phone. I try to use earbuds or the speaker during calls. But this post raises a question: If the 5G towers are so dangerous, how do workmen maintain or repair them safely?
Well of COURSE I thought of that, but then that would deny service to a lot of people, the number depending on how dense population is near the tower. So no, I don't think that's it... could be, but I'd rather hear it from someone in the field.
I recently saw a guy working up in cell tower. I would think that they would turn off the tower because there are a lot of ways to die from electrocution also.
But I'm thinking that this would not be practical, since putting cell service down for a whole day would not be acceptable.
Here is my pic from that day. You can just barely make out the technician squatting in the lower right of the tower head.
If you look at radiation emission maps for antenna, this is not true. Signals will radiate evenly unless shaped by the antennas. The antennas shape the radiation to majority front. Looks like a giant infinity symbol, majorly biased to the front. Back lobes, and indeed side lobes, exist and can be used to connect from the backside of an antenna from quite a distance when you have the proper settings for what you are using to connect with. There is no "safe" side of an antenna when it is of sufficient power, just sides that are relatively more or less powerful than the others.
The only safe way to work on cell towers for repair/maintenance is to shut the equipment down. Inconveniencing a few customers is infinitely preferrable to replacing a skilled technician that gets fried by electricity or cooked by the microwaves. Many repairs only take an hour or two. The down time is negligible in the grand scheme of things. Skilled climbers are valued as most people tend to be unreasonably scared of heights thus replacing workers can be difficult. Customers are practically a given when the cell companies are a virtual monopoly, they don't factor into the equation all that much.
Bullshit. Thats a LiPo fire as the battery probably failed on impact. Drone probably lost signal and fell out of the sky. Hardly a conspiracy or proof cell towers can "melt drones".
So lost signal, but retains camera feed? Right, how is the camera feed transmitted? And you can't think of any other cause of the battery fire? And you've used the word conspiracy wrong. The correct word is theory.
Hence the title...Real or Not ?! Which part of it being a question do you not understand....
I have a drone, that if it loses signal it will return to the take off point. This isn't the case for all drones. It is a little strange that the blades just stopped though
Need more proof. Have to see someone climb up with a cigar in their mouth and see if the tower lights it.
Lol...
5G frequencies are on the edge of and overlap into microwave territory. Exposure is a significant health risk. Ever hike up near the big microwave repeater towers? Read the warning of death by being too close to the tower signs?
Nah. Nothing to see here. Until the cancer shows up.
RF engineer here.
5G is using VERY high frequencies compared to 4G.
The higher the frequency, the more easily it is absorbed by stuff hence a chain of amplifiers is required to get the signal where it needs to go.
To that end, if you get too close to an amplifier, you can get hit with a high blast of RF hence why they are positioned so high up from where humans are.
I’ve noticed a lot of antennas very low to ground, under 25’, not sure what band. Also antenna mounted to residential apartment buildings where the adjacent buildings are very close. Can’t be good
The other way they solve the issue of high freq frying people is they turn down the wattage. That means you have to get the antenna closer though. The problem with this drone footage is they flew up near a high output high frequency area. Any tiny little weakness in that cheep drone and it was almost guaranteed to fall out of the sky. Take the drones battery pack, toss it in the microwave, and set it to 2 min on power setting 2-3. That's what they just did.
NOTE... I'm not saying its safe. I have my doubts about any of this shit being safe.
Thanks for the info....
EMFs:
There is also a substantial literature showing that EMFs are associated with other effects including
https://www.healmindbody.com/knowledges/5g-wi-fi-and-emf-damaging-effects-on-the-body/
I know people around here arent so warm to the hippy dippy stuff but if you want protection from the harmful radiation buy a mineral called shungite, there are video online of the EMF numbers being cut significantly from it. Buy some big rocks and put it around for WIFI router and itll help protect you.
Theres more you can make for more protection too.
Real
Next, 5G will melt you.
Well I'm glad I haven't just made my body a nano-circuit.
Spontaneous combustion incoming? /s
If you put your feet too close to the campfire, you will melt the rubber of your sneakers, also. It doesn't mean anything.
Much more dangerous is the power emanating from your phone because it is right up against your head.
Wait, you mean my campfire is irradiating me? Why didn't anyone tell me?
KEK!
Yeah, I've always wondered about that, especially now that I have a 5G phone. I try to use earbuds or the speaker during calls. But this post raises a question: If the 5G towers are so dangerous, how do workmen maintain or repair them safely?
They switch them off first?
Well of COURSE I thought of that, but then that would deny service to a lot of people, the number depending on how dense population is near the tower. So no, I don't think that's it... could be, but I'd rather hear it from someone in the field.
I recently saw a guy working up in cell tower. I would think that they would turn off the tower because there are a lot of ways to die from electrocution also.
But I'm thinking that this would not be practical, since putting cell service down for a whole day would not be acceptable.
Here is my pic from that day. You can just barely make out the technician squatting in the lower right of the tower head.
https://files.catbox.moe/k1623b.jpg
If you look at the transmitters, they are all pointed away from the tower and probably all radiate nothing behind it.
If you look at radiation emission maps for antenna, this is not true. Signals will radiate evenly unless shaped by the antennas. The antennas shape the radiation to majority front. Looks like a giant infinity symbol, majorly biased to the front. Back lobes, and indeed side lobes, exist and can be used to connect from the backside of an antenna from quite a distance when you have the proper settings for what you are using to connect with. There is no "safe" side of an antenna when it is of sufficient power, just sides that are relatively more or less powerful than the others.
The only safe way to work on cell towers for repair/maintenance is to shut the equipment down. Inconveniencing a few customers is infinitely preferrable to replacing a skilled technician that gets fried by electricity or cooked by the microwaves. Many repairs only take an hour or two. The down time is negligible in the grand scheme of things. Skilled climbers are valued as most people tend to be unreasonably scared of heights thus replacing workers can be difficult. Customers are practically a given when the cell companies are a virtual monopoly, they don't factor into the equation all that much.
Just a WAG here, but if the towers are in a grid pattern of some sort, could you not route the signal around the one being worked on until it's fixed?