Study this post....
What was the 16 yr plan?...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Quite frankly, I don't give a shit about votes...up or down....I post what I think is relevant and try and get people to do their own research....That's what I did....Nobody really explained ANY posts to me and I did my own digging which was actually very beneficial.... I don't see why Others cannot do the same....As for posting less, that's NOT gonna happen....I post what I want, when I want....How about you doing a breakdown or analysis in the comments...??..If you don't like or agree with my content then just scroll past man....it's that simple....I'm not here to spoon-feed the lazy individuals who just love to downvote because I don't meet their "standards".....
Can't believe anyone would tell anyone how to post or what. Then to say you have to spend your time explaining it. The drop was so clear and even if it wasn't you did Great for sharing it. Spirits High and keep um coming!!
Thank you ...I appreciate the support....
Your welcome! I look forward to reading your posts!
As you can see every comment I make has ONE downvote regardless...."They" even downvote me saying "Amen" FFS...That should tell you everything you need to know...
Fuck them....You Post exactly what you want to...I'm not normally like this but sometimes these condescending pricks really get under my skin...
All through the Q movement posts were explained by many. James corsi and praying medic, x-22 and a few more.
Yes, they did ....I explain every now and then depending on the content...We are not all the same...we are all different in our approach...My intentions are to get people to think and research for themselves.....
"My intentions are to get people to think and research for themselves."
Fair enough. I have no objection to that, and as I said, maybe I misjudged your intentions.
Yes, you did...
Hmmm. I feel constrained here to offer some defense of my position and a clarification.
One, who cares about votes? The only reason I pointed it out, is because I see the votes as a feedback system. My comment here got 3 upvotes and 7 downvotes. I don't care about the votes (can I buy fuel with them?), but that indicates at least 10 individuals thought it worth their energy to share their feedback. For me, that's relevant.
Two, my comment was about effort. The general rules emphasize (all caps): "HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only!" I thought your post was low effort (I may very well have been wrong), but I shared my feedback on that. You don't have to agree, but it was not intended as an attack or as a demand.
Three, I offered suggestions. You don't have to agree, obviously, and I'm quite glad to have your response and to read it. I could have just ignored your post. Why didn't I? Because I get jollies in attacking others on GAW? (I think we're both better than that).
I take my time and effort on GAW seriously, and I don't think I'm wrong to attempt to engage you or anyone else in a serious conversation about what we do here, how it can be improved, or where we collectively find value. It's that simple.
Four, my point was NOT about people being spoon-fed or being provided content without doing the work. For me, a lot of the best value I got out of being involved in r/GA, v/QRV, and GWA was when I did my own analysis and discussion, shared that with others, and then engaged on that basis. Or when reading others' analysis, and then engaging.
If I reached the wrong conclusion about your efforts, and misjudged what you are attempting to do, then what? ... apology? I mean, I just offered feedback. Let's not make it anything more or less than that.