If they had this posted in the beginning of the article, LIKE THEY ARE JOURNALISTICALLY REQUIRED, then there would be no issue. You're allowing your love of the content to blind you from the principle.
As it stands, this is clickbait and an old article posing as news (in order to get more click$$$).
I don’t care about the date. How many times do I need to tell you that. All I care is at the cottage is available to wake people up. God people are so stupid here
If they had this posted in the beginning of the article, LIKE THEY ARE JOURNALISTICALLY REQUIRED, then there would be no issue. You're allowing your love of the content to blind you from the principle.
As it stands, this is clickbait and an old article posing as news (in order to get more click$$$).
I don’t care about the date. How many times do I need to tell you that. All I care is at the cottage is available to wake people up. God people are so stupid here
You can say as many times that you don't care, but the point still stands that it's wrong and it's clickbait.
Responding to my top level comment with your own personal feelings is not a valid rebuttal of my point.
Let me guess you’re an accountant
Hahaha not even tangentially close. I just know how to present and defend a valid argument.