CLICKBAIT. This is a regurgitated story from last year.
The National File received the document through the means of a whistleblower who feared the media organization that hired him would not publish it in the penultimate days prior to the presidential election.
Also it isn't the "full" diary. Names are redacted.
With a few redactions made into the diary so as to hold back the identities of private individuals
Just because it was published before, doesn’t mean that Some people may have not seen it before. It’s not click bait. Everyone who’s already seen it knows it. But those that don’t, will definitely get an eye-opener. I’m all for re-posting and bringing the stuff back up to the surface for those who have reawakened since his first being published, could see the truth.
Also if Hunter didn’t want people to know what his father did, why would he have been so careless with his laptops.
At this point in time I think it’s a way for the information to get out, without them being accused of doing it.
You should know better than anybody else how difficult it would be for somebody to actually name their accuser, knowing that they were at one time vice president of the United States of America, and now the most powerful man in the entire world.
If a child can’t deal with the trauma, it Hass to go through counseling and deal with that trauma, even facing just a basic nobody as their accuser, is extremely difficult, if it all possible.
I’m very aware of sexual abuse, as I have endured it myself. However when I had my daughter I spent quite a bit of time studying that very topic so it wouldn’t happen to her.
It turns out the reason why pedophilia is so prominent, is because the trauma is so deep, a woman will deny it even happened, and allow it to happen to their own daughter, so they don’t have to deal with their own trauma. This is sick. But it’s a cycle, just like drug abuse and other cycles. It’s just more insidious.
By your claims… They should all be private until Ashley decide she wants to publicly name her father the president of the United States of America as her abuser.
Like that’s ever going to happen. I’m not happy that her privacy was invaded, but it is what it is right now, and if something good could come of this; don’t you think it would be a good thing if charges were filed against Joe Biden?
Any other person on this planet who was accused and proved of having showers with their 10 or 11-year-old daughter would be taken to jail and sent to prison.
She did name her accuser in that diary. It was her father. Who sexualized her, and forced her to have showers with him as an adolescent. It doesn’t matter if he had penetrated her or not that is still pedophilia. Period.
Last names were redacted in just 9 places, probably two or three personal friends who are probably irrelevant and wouldn't really help us if we knew the last names. If she is on any social media, they might be findable.
CLICKBAIT. This is a regurgitated story from last year.
Also it isn't the "full" diary. Names are redacted.
And that makes it less relevant?
Not that it’s any less relevant or important, but slightly misleading in that it’s new materials or documents
Yes, because the implication is that we have new dirt to work with.
Just because it was published before, doesn’t mean that Some people may have not seen it before. It’s not click bait. Everyone who’s already seen it knows it. But those that don’t, will definitely get an eye-opener. I’m all for re-posting and bringing the stuff back up to the surface for those who have reawakened since his first being published, could see the truth.
Agreed. We gotta keep this relevant for those that are new to the movement. Just because we know doesn't mean everyone else knows
The article is dated today, as if it's fresh off the press. A newspaper wouldn't print an old headline and news story under the current date.
Right. Because MSM is ethical!
Are you being thick on purpose? OP posted a NEW ARTICLE that presents OLD NEWS
Also if Hunter didn’t want people to know what his father did, why would he have been so careless with his laptops.
At this point in time I think it’s a way for the information to get out, without them being accused of doing it.
You should know better than anybody else how difficult it would be for somebody to actually name their accuser, knowing that they were at one time vice president of the United States of America, and now the most powerful man in the entire world.
If a child can’t deal with the trauma, it Hass to go through counseling and deal with that trauma, even facing just a basic nobody as their accuser, is extremely difficult, if it all possible.
I’m very aware of sexual abuse, as I have endured it myself. However when I had my daughter I spent quite a bit of time studying that very topic so it wouldn’t happen to her.
It turns out the reason why pedophilia is so prominent, is because the trauma is so deep, a woman will deny it even happened, and allow it to happen to their own daughter, so they don’t have to deal with their own trauma. This is sick. But it’s a cycle, just like drug abuse and other cycles. It’s just more insidious.
By your claims… They should all be private until Ashley decide she wants to publicly name her father the president of the United States of America as her abuser.
Like that’s ever going to happen. I’m not happy that her privacy was invaded, but it is what it is right now, and if something good could come of this; don’t you think it would be a good thing if charges were filed against Joe Biden?
Any other person on this planet who was accused and proved of having showers with their 10 or 11-year-old daughter would be taken to jail and sent to prison.
She did name her accuser in that diary. It was her father. Who sexualized her, and forced her to have showers with him as an adolescent. It doesn’t matter if he had penetrated her or not that is still pedophilia. Period.
If it was that important and it was that private, then why did she leave it behind?
I've not looked/read it, nor do I want to, but why redact names? CYA?
Surprised an unredacted hasn't leaked somewhere.
Last names were redacted in just 9 places, probably two or three personal friends who are probably irrelevant and wouldn't really help us if we knew the last names. If she is on any social media, they might be findable.
There are only 9 redactions of last names in the whole thing. I don't care about her friend Kevin.