I believe It might be a warmup. Or another communist attempt at takeover. If this is the mark, where is the beast, where is its peace and miracles ? Wheres the rapture of the church ? No, I believe that there's still stuff that has to happen before the marking. You see, all the vaccines could just be saline and not do anything at all(we know they're not,but bear with me) all the fuckery we see being done, it's around the act of vaccination, and proof thereof,instead of what's being injected. Remain vigilant, but do not despair.

The only argument I would have against the vax being the mark of the beast is that, in the book of revelation, it sounds like people will knowingly take/have the mark. They will KNOWINGLY CHOOSE to worship the beast. It sounds like the mark of the beast happens after Christ followers ascend to heaven. If you read the verses that discuss the mark, it’s written in such a way that those who worship satin will have it. Perhaps I’m wrong, but only time will tell and all will be revealed.

“It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.” * ‭‭Revelation‬ ‭13:16 - 17‬ ‭NIV‬‬

That seems pretty darn clear & self explanatory to me, much like the 2A.

I discussed this some 35 yrs ago with my Uncle, who is a Missionary, and a quite famous preacher. My point was, I felt the translation may have been wrong. specially the forehead intrigued me, as a 60s Child, I grew up with comic strips, and in a cartoon, they often use a balloon or a writing/pic on the forehead to simbolize a thought the character was having. Then next I asked my Uncle, if in the Vulgata (oldest bible version) really meant the wrist, or could it be also the Hand. He said it was used for both. So I figured out, that we all already had it, the Mark of the Beast: Its the credit card in your hand and the pin code in your mind. But this can be upgraded though, as we are seeing.

Use an interlinear bible if you really want to dig in.

I am in complete agreement. Also, couple the vaccine/vaxx passport with the 666 patent of Bill Gates, and you have yourself the mark and the number.

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606

I believe wholeheartedly it is the beginning of the deception for the Mark of The Beast System to be set up! No doubt in my mind whatsoever! You see the Satanist trying to implement it already starting with New York and then Boston etc., You can't shop, buy go to Restaurants, or any entertainment events without the PASS!

I believe those that have right and wrong reversed and know it yet continue to do so have accepted the mark of the beast. The Bible says that it will be on your forehead or hand. Forehead meaning Satan controls our thoughts or hand we actually do evil… obviously using our hands to do evil.

I'm not trying to distract from the message in this video because it is important. However, using only KJV Bibles is not getting the most out of the biblical lexicology. He brings up a good point to always be wary of the translation. Use multiple sources and use a lexicon to find the original Greek word. In this case the Greek word used in Rev. 13:16 is 'epi' (G1909), which means (1) upon, on, at, by, before (2) of position, on, at, by, over, against (3) to, over, on, at, across, against. This provides greater insight to the meaning. It appears to me that the mark doesn't necessarily mean that it is 'on' the right hand or 'on' their forehead, but it could be 'over', 'across', 'at', 'by', or even 'before' the right hand or their forehead. The three definitions for 'epi' is the word 'on' though. The Greek word 'epi' doesn't specifically state it means 'in' like it does in some versions of the bible. Actually, this provides a better context to the possibilities of what the mark could be. In other words, anything that looks like it could be the mark and should raise the alarm, like we are seeing right now. I don't believe many people will figure it out precisely what it is, until they are confronted with it in a state of duress and terrible oppression.

I wrote some information below that is 'tangential' to the video, but provides a larger scope for the importance of using several sources to understand Scripture.

All Protestant Bibles including the King James is based on the Masoretic Text, which is the work done by the Masoretes in 900 AD. Who are the Masoretes? They are Pharisaic Jews (Pharisees), who recreated a new written 'Hebrew' from Arabic and other existing Canaanitish languages because the original Hebrew was lost in antiquity. The Masoretes used the Greek Septuagint to create a new written 'Hebrew' that had vowel points. Using the Greek Septuagint along with Protestant Bibles provide a better understanding than using just KJV.

The oldest Bible OT there is the Septuagint, which was transliterated from the original Hebrew in circa 285 BC. The original Hebrew written language was becoming extinct. According to tradition, it was Ptolemy Philadelphus, who purchased the freedom of Israelites in his territories, arranged for 6 scholars from each of the 12 tribes to translate the first 5 books of the Old Testament (Pentateuch) from Hebrew into Greek around 285 BC. By this time a practical knowledge of the Hebrew written language was all but lost. The original written Hebrew consisted only of consonants and relied on an oral knowledge to decipher the consonant only words. Think of the 'cat' and remove the vowel. It becomes 'ct'. Without the vowel, the word 'ct' could be cat, cot, cut, cute, etc. An individual of knowledge would be required to orally teach what the word 'ct' was. This is how the Hebrew written language was passed down generation after generation. With the written Hebrew language being dominated by the popular Greek language, which was the world language of the day, Hebrew was in danger of being lost. Ptolemy gathered together 72 scholars and in a short period of time they completed the Pentateuch. The Latin name 'Septuagint' means 70, and was later applied to the translation, for there was approximately 70 translators. This is also the reason why the abbreviation 'LXX' is used for this reason. After the first 5 books were finished, the translators set out to work on the rest of the OT. The exact date this was accomplished is not known, but it is certain the complete OT was finished within 100 years and it is likely it was completed within a few years by the same translators.

My belief is that we are seeing the dress rehearsal for the Mark of the Beast. While this isn't (IMHO) the mark of the beast yet, it is certainly laying the technical foundation for the Antichrist to use it to brand those that have chosen to worship him.

I am not vaxxed and have no intention of getting vaxxed or taking anything that resembles the MotB. I expect to be raptured up with my Savior before the Antichrist arrives on the scene. What a glorious day that will be. This world is very lost in sin. I can't wait to see my heavenly home. God bless.

The original text reads in greek ἐπὶ (epi) which means "on, to,against, on the basis of, at" according to biblehub.

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/revelation/13-16.htm

https://biblehub.com/greek/epi_1909.htm

It can be translated as "in", or "on" or "at" and generally translators try to use context to decide which translation seems most appropriate. In this instance, it is difficult to determine which translation the context favors.

If you look at the word for "mark" which is χάραγμα (charagma) you will see that it refers to "Sculpture; engraving, stamp, or sign. Same as Charax; a scratch or etching, ie Stamp, or sculpted figure." and generally seems to give a concept of a mark being engraved or etched into a stone or statue surface, but could indicate a superficial marking ON an object (stamp) OR a marking IN an object (engraving).

The original Koine Greek, from which come all translations, notes that word as EPI which almost always means "on" or "upon." If it were "in" we would expect the Greek EN which can be both "in" or "on." If it were EN you'd have a solid linguistic argument. However, with it being EPI, the argument falls flat. Then there is also the Theological interpretation of this passage and all of John's Revelation, which warrants another discussion. Christ's peace to you, brother.

If I remember correctly, Young's Literal Translation uses the word "upon", so still a matter of (likely inaccurate) interpretation.

If you’re a dispensationalist, sure. If you’re post-millennial or amillennial then this is just more bumps in the road.

We search for Truth. More thoughts on this?