https://freeatlantis.com/@h53pilot
I love the government in exile theory being discussed by @SLAG. I watched his interview with Patel Patriot last night. Great stuff.
I agree wholeheartedly with most of it. However, I don't think Trump would count on SCOTUS being our last hope. Especially after what it demonstrated from Nov 3rd, 2020 to Jan 20th, 2021.
With that in the rearview mirror, I don't understand how we could roll the dice on them anymore. Not when the fate of the nation is on the line… But government in exile? Yes.
High military involvement? Yes.
The WWII parallels are terrific.
I have (as many know... of course!) proposed an alternative solution that does not rely on ANY element of the corrupted federal government (that we know of publicly, that is).
It completely bypasses the entire thing.
A solution where the SCOTUS has no say whatever. In fact, this solution would, in effect, tell SCOTUS to sit down and shut up…
The solution is the union of states, having been offered, and having accepted an alternative federal authority (the makeup of which could be in many forms), which has left any D.C. authority entirely out of the loop.
In other words, D.C. has been completely neutered. Any legacy government structure the deep state and the CCP depends on no longer has any authority, even though it might appear to…
But that is only long enough for the appointed federal authority to ready the field for legitimate elections and to rid the country of foreign elements that could sabotage the effort before revealing what reality is…
To state plainly, Trump was able to coordinate with state legislatures to gain 75% ratification for the solution he prepared and offered them in the event the system (including SCOTUS) could not rectify the election fraud.
SCOTUS WAS an option before Jan 20th. It was tested before our eyes. It failed the test, in my opinion, when it rejected the Texas case...
The solution Trump could have offered was:
-
an alternative federal authority;
-
draft Constitutional changes to legitimately transfer authorities to the alternative authority Trump prepared;
-
a mechanism by which PORTIONS of state legislatures could be clandestinely briefed on the treason and the prepared solution
-
it was turn-key from the state legislators' point of view.
So... this would require little to no effort on state legislators' part...
Trump did ALL the work and implemented it secretly through a mechanism that he controlled and could withhold any knowledge of except those he chose to inform.
I realize many people might think it would be impossible to get so many legislators to agree, let alone, not spill the beans. I disagree.
I think it would be quite feasible. Especially if Trump did all the legwork and all they had to do was nod their heads in astonishment.
He pulled up in a Maserati and said, "get in..."
Here's why it could have happened (we'll go to the how after that):
Given that Trump knew (likely even before 2016) that the uni-party had been fixing elections for a long time, he had war gamed this out, at a minimum after he won in 2016.
With multiple courses of action (COAs) at the ready, he embarked on draining the swamp.
One of those COAs would have been what I'm talking about...
So, I'm not proposing it was cobbled together after the Democrats stole the House in 2018, or after COVID hit (unplanned event) in late 2019, or after the system failed us post Nov 2020.
I'm saying it was one of many potential COAs developed a long time ago and that, as events occurred, some COAs were winnowed out until this one was the only one left standing...
especially after SCOTUS totally failed us post-2020 election…
I think we would all agree, on this forum at least, that no one would know the legal and Constitutional aspects of all the COAs better than Trump.
And I think the COA of "let the system work it out or fail," was one COA that ran its course.
The People had to see the system fail.
Perhaps Trump even hoped it would work, although this final COA is the solution to end ALL elements of the deep state. For a very long time, at least. There will be nothing left…
In fact, there WOULD be nothing legally left even now except a ghost of itself. Everything we're seeing could fit into this theory.
We wouldn't have to worry about what SCOTUS will do anymore.
The swamp wasn't just drained. It was nuked.
It had to be. SCOTUS plainly demonstrated this…
The "why" is that this solution allows, over the next 3-5 years, the gradual, methodical, and complete build-back of the federal government, under the watchful eye of the union of states - the REAL authority and voice of The People.
No more deep state foot-dragging and sabotage of the effort.
They're gone completely. The only thing left is the military, whose leadership can be replaced in an instant. ALL other federal authorities are null and void… This solution relegates the military to its proper place... an instrument of The People, not their savior or master.
How could this have been implemented? I'll write more on that tonight or tomorrow.
But think Executive Orders, and one in particular. EO 13848. And its timing.
It enabled the 2-year information collection effort; the results of which Trump could have sitting in the passenger seat of his Maserati.
No we do not....
We Do need the Original 13th Amendment, the Titles of Nobility Amendment, which gives teeth to the Titles of Nobility Clause....
As for the current 13 thru 27 we do not need any of them, none at all....
Should women and blacks be taxed without representation? IIRC those were both after 1871.
Everyone should be Taxed equally....
That being said, the ONLY form of Taxation should be in line with the Commerce Clause....
That being said, nobody should be allowed/forced into Contracts with the federation..... i.e. SSN, Drivers License, License plate, Medicare/Medicaid, etc....
All those things should be kept at State Level, and not as Forced Contracts, we are supposed to be a Republic, not a Socialism.....
The 14th Amendment created for the very First time, the Federal Citizen, aka U.S. Citizens....
That aberration should be destroyed, and everyone returned to their Natural Original State Citizen Status.....
With that, we should return to the Original Voting System, where ONLY Land Owners are allowed to Vote....
It is only Right because then it would be only Land Owners Paying the Taxes....
Corporations could not Vote, they are not Natural Persons....
Women and Blacks could still vote, IF they are Land Owners, and yes there are plenty of them who own land....
Come to think of it, neither group was EVER excluded from Voting, as long as they Owned Lands, and there is a plethora of proof that Both Women, and Blacks Owned Lands and Voted....
Those who do not Own Lands are Not Invested, they do not get Taxed, so what do they care if you pay huge Land Taxes?? It doesn't hurt them at all....
On the other hand, FOREIGNERS should pay Income Taxes, Travel Taxes, etc., Would you be ok with your Family Paying Those taxes, or some foreigner instead??
In other words, if a vast swath of the American populace, or even a majority, can't afford to own land, then they are ruled by those fortunate ones who can.
Sounds like a plutoligarchy. Bet you'd have no trouble selling that plan to renters! LOL
Not only that, what about the people who own ten acres instead of one? Or 100? They pay 100 times more in taxes, so they should have 100 votes!
What could possibly go wrong
No that is not at all what I said....
You twisted it all around in your mind, and that is not my position, although it might be ours.....
No, you do not get a Vote per Acre, nor a Vote per Lot, or anything like that.....
It does not matter how much land one owns, one Lot vs 10,000 Acres, bot individuals get only one vote each....
The POINT, both are Invested in the land, it is the Land that makes the State....
And although limited, I still know of certain Lands that can be gained simply by applying for a Land Grant.....
That means it is FREE LAND, but some come with strings, might be in a swampy area, maybe the catch is to plant 100 trees, aka Start an Orchard....
I know of Lands that are being sold an acre for $150.00, with Water, and $100.00 without....
Scarcity is not the problem, the actual Problem is either laziness or lack of self worth....
Lands are still open for settlement, there are still man places unsettled, so the problem is the Public, not the lack of lands.....
As for who gets to "Rule", it is still those who are Elected in OPEN PUBLIC ELECTIONS, no more "Secret Voting", no more Bullshit, 100% transparent, but only by those who are INVESTED, those who are not invested do not need to have a Voice, and this could also be adjusted so that those who Rent on the bottom floor of an apartment building, get to vote, but 2nd story and above, nope....
And no, it is not a Plutarchy, nor is it an Oligarchy, nor a mix of both, mainly because it doesn't matter HOW MUCH land one owns, the only thing is that each Land Owner gets 1 Vote....
If you try to understand the basic Concept first, without prejudice, it makes sense....