I don't understand why this is a big win when Nevada already has a religious exemption statute, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 392.435, 437, 439. This already addresses the Nevada system of Higher Education (NSHE), which includes colleges. Federal judges have already ruled against college mandates. And the commission's lawyers have only advised them of this fact. The question is who is responsible for this abuse of power? Nevada Law already provides for religious exemptions.

NRS 392.437  Immunization of pupils: Exemption if prohibited by religious belief.  A public school shall not refuse to enroll a child as a pupil because the child has not been immunized pursuant to NRS 392.435 if the parents or guardian of the child has submitted to the board of trustees of the school district or the governing body of a charter school in which the child has been accepted for enrollment a written statement indicating that their religious belief prohibits immunization of such child. (Added to NRS by 1971, 1040; A 1997, 1876).

If there is some F*ckery going on due to the EAU, its because officials are falsely claiming the FDA NOT approved experimental Pfizer shot is 'legally' interchangeable with the FDA approved Comirnaty injection. Comirnaty is not available in the United States. Furthermore, a Federal Judge has ruled in the case involving the DoD that Cominaty is legally different than the Pfizer jab. Again, the Pfizer experimental vaccine is NOT FDA approved. It is strictly experimental. This means by law you have a right to not be part of an experiment without consequence. This is found in 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) to wit:

(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

The Nevadans are being fed the same LIE. Wake up America.

The Nevada State Board of Health is the source of the problem and Nevadans need to replace these Marxist despots and if necessary charge them under TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242.

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.