My sister who is a nurse and triple vaxxed got an operation for her shoulder. Afterwards a nurse secretly came to her and said her heart stopped during the surgery and there was mass bleeding and clotting problems. Then the official report for the surgery says bleeding was normal and everything went perfectly.
She scheduled a zoom meeting to discuss why the report is lying to her and the surgeon kept lying saying her heart was great, everything went perfectly etc... She's a nurse and I was hoping these lies would wake her up to their corrupt behaviors, nope, she believes them, she's thinking it was just a misunderstanding because "doctors are good people".
She thinks since she's a high-integrity nurse, that other health workers would never lie or cover anything up.
I'm pretty upset. She has heart problems and clotting problems and she's not going to look into those serious issues because a doctor says "she's fine". Please pray for her, the medical industry will rot in hell soon. God will bring justice.
Follow the money. I’d imagine the bills will show what treatment was administered and help sort the truth out. Medical codes and such.
Wouldn't insurance only pay out based on official documentation? If they were willing to manipulate the reports, It wouldn't make sense to attempt an insurance claim for the extra services - unless they are just dumb and greedy and want to dubble dip with Soros and the insurance provider.
Is it possible to get a medical screening that can detect previous cardiac episodes or clotting? I.e. scarring of the heart tissue or something?
If there were no drugs given or specific procedures performed during the surgery that can be charged out, no one would be the wiser. To streamline the mountains of extra data entry hospitals require, reporting is kept to a minimum. The only ones that would even be aware of what occurred during surgery would be those present to actually see. The surgeon would have simply controlled the situation with minimal intervention and removed clots as part of clearing the field. Bleeding is also a condition not out of the realm of surgical possibility and is also dealt with as part of just doing the job. Sometimes there are anesthesia issues or cardiac interruptions that happen as well. If the situation is controlled and no further intervention needed, everyone just carries on and finishes the procedure. No harm, no foul. They are on a time schedule after all and the clock is ticking.
What seems shocking to the average person is taken as no big deal to those involved in the nuts and bolts of the surgical world. I have personally felt that clinicians can be lulled into a false sense of security at times as far as medical emergencies are concerned, but the average surgeon is much better prepared for them than most providers simply because of what they do. It is frustrating that these observations that occur during surgery are not passed along to the patient for follow-up with their PCP or a specialist to check for previously unknown conditions that are only discovered during these kinds of procedures. Most of the time further investigation of these findings do not necessarily turn up anything significant. But, on occasion there is something substantial discovered and the decision to investigate the matter further should be left up to the patient. It all just depends on the surgeon. The fact that a fellow nurse felt it necessary to come to her to relay this information is concerning. Other professionals such as nurses bring a different perspective to the situation and at times do note conditions that should be flagged. Physicians, and especially surgeons, are not gods - even though some may think that they are.
If surgeons, because of the clot shots, are seeing more of these trends in the patients they treat, this may also explain a lack of concern as they start to get used to most of their patients presenting this way. A new norm so to speak. They simply learn to adapt to the changes and move on. I don't agree with this attitude, but it is what it is. In this day of vaxxine comps and cognitive dissonance, reporting such things may be more of a can of worms than some are willing to open. She should still follow-up at least with a D-dimer to check clotting. That would be the easiest way to find out if there is anything to really worry about.
What is the window for a D-dimer test? Is there a time frame or any limitation as far as obtaining useful information goes?
As far as the vax in concerned, the risks for clotting appear to be greatest in the first couple of weeks post vax but can still be a threat even weeks later. It just depends. Everyone is different and we are still trying to figure out what exactly is happening here. We see the effects, but what exactly is the cause is yet to be definitely determined. The D-dimer gives a picture of what is occurring in the body at the time the test is taken. If there is micro-clotting, it will show up in the test so that anticoagulant treatment can be initiated if needed. It is far better to get a heads up rather than wait for an event to occur. These clots can be massive and can occur anywhere in the body resulting in possible death or severe disability. I don't think we have seen anything like this before at the scale it is occurring. Cavernous sinus thrombosis for example was extremely rare and many clinicians never saw a case in years of practice. Now, they are showing up and several cases have been reported since the vax rollout.
I have seen microscopy of several blood samples of vaxxed and non-vaxxed patients. Every one of the vaxxed samples showed some degree of coagulation effects - even when patients felt fine. Some of the samples were such a tangled mess of rouleauxed (stacked) cells that I wondered how any blood could flow through capillary beds - especially in organ tissue. I have heard similar reports from autopsies and from other clinicians that have examined specifically the blood effects of these shots. There is a reason they are called clot shots.
I would advise anyone that has been jabbed, especially if they have noticed a change in how they feel that has lasted more than a few days post inoculation, to get a D-dimer to rule out clotting. The problem for most will be getting their providers to order the test.
Remember, the only way to see if you are building micro-clots is to get a D-Dimer test. Until the spike protein building attack is stopped, the body will be creating this damaged clot formation. You should get a D-Dimer immediately, and get on anti-coagulants ASAP if your number is high. You should repeat the test every couple of weeks until the numbers go back to normal. If the numbers are still elevated, you may need to continue on something like Eliquis every day until further notice. Otherwise you are at risk of a clot, embolism or stroke.
often times the op report is attached to the billing as evidence the procedures being billed for were indeed done. (This is for the surgeons billing).
Great idea. Insurance makes the hospital itemize, question every item, even kleenex.