Oh man, you have taken the black pill, kek. Q has emphasised many times what these resignations mean. No, they are not leaving because they can be replaced by "strong candidates". Most of these are probably entrenched in their seats for years and have the election system all under their control. Also, these are not the generous folks who would kindly step away right when their guy got the historic number of votes, just to potentially help the party. These are the people who have no choice but to leave.
When you have one person announcing they will not run for the re-election, out of the blue - then you are correct. Thats how it worked historically. Not when a deluge of people start saying that. Not right after what is supposed to be their historic win.
I'm not the intended recipient of the question but at the rate things are going regarding election security, absolutely they could. Why not? A literal tuber got elected president because they control the voting machines.
When you own the voting machines and control the vote counting and can put up visual barriers to block poll watchers from observing your fraud, you can just rig and steal the election again.
The focus on the audits and legal, legitimate elections seems to have evaporated.
I was making a general observation about own personal experience playing the real game of Risk. If you appear too strong. Your opponents will stomp you ruthlessly.
Mario Kart strategy: hang out in the 2 or 3 spot as 1st will get hit hardest by Blue Shells and 1st place seeking power ups. Then 2 and 3 can swoop in for 1st.
Only when playing Risk in the middle game.
Oh man, you have taken the black pill, kek. Q has emphasised many times what these resignations mean. No, they are not leaving because they can be replaced by "strong candidates". Most of these are probably entrenched in their seats for years and have the election system all under their control. Also, these are not the generous folks who would kindly step away right when their guy got the historic number of votes, just to potentially help the party. These are the people who have no choice but to leave.
When you have one person announcing they will not run for the re-election, out of the blue - then you are correct. Thats how it worked historically. Not when a deluge of people start saying that. Not right after what is supposed to be their historic win.
Q has mentioned this numerous times: https://qalerts.pub/?q=resignations
I'm not the intended recipient of the question but at the rate things are going regarding election security, absolutely they could. Why not? A literal tuber got elected president because they control the voting machines.
When you own the voting machines and control the vote counting and can put up visual barriers to block poll watchers from observing your fraud, you can just rig and steal the election again.
The focus on the audits and legal, legitimate elections seems to have evaporated.
I was making a general observation about own personal experience playing the real game of Risk. If you appear too strong. Your opponents will stomp you ruthlessly.
Mario Kart strategy: hang out in the 2 or 3 spot as 1st will get hit hardest by Blue Shells and 1st place seeking power ups. Then 2 and 3 can swoop in for 1st.
The underdog position gifts tje sweetest bones.
At least you picked your battlefield proudly.
Did you actually read the entire article?
Probably just read the title.