I'm getting really tired of this being called an mRNA vaccine. There is so much ignorance, confusion, and generalizations going around about this.
Most of the arguments about this assume 2 things,
1: the vaccine is mRNA (it's not)
2: DNA transcription goes one way, and the vac can't alter your DNA. (also not true)
Time to 'follow the science'
to start, a little about how DNA works.
searchx/startpage: "reverse transcriptase"
- Reverse transcriptase An enzyme that generates DNA
"A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription. Reverse transcriptases are used by viruses such as HIV and hepatitis B to replicate their genomes, by retrotransposon mobile genetic elements to proliferate within the host genome, and by eukaryotic cells to extend the telomeres at the ends of their linear chromosomes. Contrary to a widely held belief, the process does not violate the flows of genetic information as described by the classical central dogma, as transfers of information from RNA to DNA are explicitly held possible. "
normally info flows from DNA- RNA but we have latent code from old viruses AND DNA repair / anti-cancer code that will try to 'fix' DNA in your cells by repairing it with RNA.
kind of a "look at the RNA floating around, better make sure it source code is in the DNA" situation going on in the body. It doesn't happen 100%, as in it won't update the DNA in all your cells overnight, but it DOES happen, and if it happens in the sperm/eggs it can be passed down.
Now, most people DON'T have mRNA floating around in their blood. even the vaxxed. They mostly have the spike protein coursing through their bodies, which can be transmitted to you but won't directly alter your DNA. You will just make antibodies for the spike proteins you are exposed to.
The people that get vaxed have a not zero chance of DNA alteration in one or more cells in their body, but probably not their entire body.
Ok, now that we have that out of the way, onto the main attraction.
I have noticed this is something that people don't talk about at all. I would like to change this, so please help me spread some of this science info.
The vaccine is NOT mRNA!!!! There are enzymes in your body that go around looking for mRNA, find it, and break it down into component parts to be re-used. mRNA is supposed to create a message to do something, then vanish once that something is done. On-going effects, normally cause continuous streams of RNA to be made.
This was undesirable from the point of vac manufacturers.
So they 'stabilize' it. to keep this normal safe process from happening. How do you keep the RNA from breaking down so fast and sticking around longer? They change it so it's not real RNA and your body doesn't detect it to break it down normally. They do a TON of stuff, under the term 'stabilization', and play it off like all they are doing is adding salt to the mixture and keeping the vax cold. Nothing could be further from the truth.
They are doing 6 things to the 'RNA' that make it, well not really RNA...
-
A 'cap' is put on the start of the RNA. This cap is made out of 3 different sub caps stringed together. 'nucleotide methylation' This 'header' of non-RNA at the start of the RNA does 4 things, makes it hold together better, attracts transcription enzymes to make more than normal proteins out of it, stops the body from recognizing it as foreign, and stops the breakdown enzymes from attaching.
-
A flag is attached between the cap and the RNA that allows the transition enzymes attracted by the cap to latch on and transcribe easier than normal RNA. all 4 of the above molecules are NOT RNA and are NEVER found on normal RNA
-
nucloside modified 'mRNA' RNA normally consists of adenine (A), uracil (U), cytosine (C), and/ or guanine (G) strung together. The 'fraken-RNA' includes the incorporation of modified nucleotides in the mRNA sequence, such as methylated nucleosides or pseudouridine.
Cytidines can also be replaced with numerous chemical modifications, including 5-methylcytidine (m5C); uridines can be converted into 5-methyluridine (m5U), 2-thiouridine (s2U), 5-methoxyuridine (5moU), pseudouridine (ψ) and N1-methylpseudouridine (m1ψ), while adenosines can be replaced by N1-methyladenosine (m1A) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A)
So normally DNA / RNA has an alphabet consisting of 4 letters each, from a total of 5 letters. the DNA->rna process transcribed the 4th letter for the 5th, which is what makes DNA and RNA actually different.
The 'vaccines' introduce 8 new 'letters' to the RNA sequence, that do not get detected by your body as RNA. They get transcribed by the transcriber, sure. but it is NOT RNA. The current batch is using "pseudouridine (ψ)" as a substitute for uridine.
-
Another noncoding flag is put at the end of the sequence, further increasing stability and preventing the breakdown
-
followed by another artificial not even pretend RNA tail at the end to help hold shape for optimal transcription and to prevent breakdown.
-
Encapsulation: normally your body would detect a Frankenstein molecule like this as not RNA and destroy it before it ever gets into your cells to pretend to be RNA. However, the vaccines encapsulate it in something else to stop this from happening. 6a) lipid foam - wrapped up in vacuoles, pretending to be tiny not-cell cells, that look like tiny cells from the outside but are basically empty inside. Your white blood cells will consume these, travel to the heart, and die releasing them to build up in the cardio system (myocarditis) 6b) nanoparticles with iron cores, same problem as the lipid foam but ALSO these make you magnetic 6c) wrapped up in a viral shell, like old school vaccines.
source: National Institute of Health: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8299225/
TL;DR RNA contains URIDINE (U) PSUDO RNA CONTAINS pseudouridine (ψ)
This is very important! But as you say you want it to be as fact-based as possible before wider presentation. I'd suggest trimming it but enlarging the TLDR to convey:
ModRNA (modified) is not mRNA (messenger)!
NIH published the differences!
ModRNA is not composed just of the 4 RNA bases but can have up to 8 other bases to make it easier to produce!
ModRNA is not just the bases but is surrounded by flags, caps, lipids, nanos, and a viral shell to give it unnatural advantages over mRNA!
RNA is known to sometimes change DNA (reverse transcription), and ModRNA does so with a vengeance!
As you go make sure to spell "franken" correctly and to make sure each time whether you mean uracil (the nucleobase) or uridine (the nucleoside). I don't know for sure which to say in each case without reading the paper closely.
My next suggestions would be:
Use brief quotes to demonstrate that people are in fact miscalling it mRNA, which should not be the scientific term (modRNA is) and deliberately easy to mistake. As you note, to say "mRNA vaccine" allows people to infer it contains unmodified mRNA and not much else. [Example: the "milk" in "almond milk". Some producers honestly admit "We call it that only because we 'milked' the nuts."]
Include comment on why the CDC or other sites are saying DNA is not affected even though reverse transcription exists. (It's also possible the pathway is not reverse transcription but lymphocyte modification, the same way natural viruses are recognized, as we've recently heard that all the "vaccine" deaths are lymphocyte failure!) And, I've just found a smoking gun at Forbes about this that is big enough to need a separate comment.
On initial review it appears to me that the body naturally substitutes pseudouridine at times, so this dodge by the producers is less important than all the "plastic wrap" they surround the modRNA with, and emphasis should be balanced accordingly.
It's great news. See if you have some further edits and I'll request a sticky in a moment.
Now I feel silly.
Hence, Mod-e-RNA. Moderna.
Makes perfect sense.
Well, I never was going to take it -- but now I'm never going to take it even harder!
Ahh, the body of SOME animals does produce it a very select few times, corresponding to extreme stress and for a limited duration. There are certain pathways around it, and apparently another 200 ish alternative bases they have discovered throughout the entire plant/animal kingdoms (and other lifeforms) and want to start experimenting with. According to the papers they have no idea how any of it works, or why it's used, but they really want to play with it more.
I'm conflicted about what to say about that, how much detail to put in. I already thought it was long.
I read that if you had HIV or have it, you likely have the needed enzymes for the reverse transcription that would essentially incorporate this modified RNA into your cells...dooming them to make it forever. Do you know more about this? Are there other enzymes that could be in one's body if you DIDN'T have HIV, that could do this? i.e. - another viral infection? I mean...do they EVEN know what the h*ll they are playing with here?!??
what I do know, is that when I read the papers that should be answering these questions there are lots of unknowns. We don't know very much at all about this stuff, lots of this medical nano tech is brand new. People vastly overestimate the knowledge and skills of the 'experts' and 'professionals' in charge of this.
Definitely - these researchers are really guessing with this sh*t and this is one grand experiment. People really need to realize this! Thanks for your post and all this great info!
The guy who invented mRNA says otherwise.
It's my understanding that the guy who invented mRNA was Jesus Christ, within the Godhead, and God is pretty clear that mRNA is not modRNA. We can define words the way we want, but we also need to acknowledge the many differences between what we made and what he made.
mRNA technology was not invented by God, just like the wheel was not invented by God. All things exist because of God, but God gave man dominion over all the earth.
Dr Robert Malone invented the mRNA tech used in the “vaccines.”
Thanks for explaining, those are two different kinds of mRNA tech. One is the natural info processing tech invented by God that works so perfectly that we take it for granted, the other is the additional workaround info processing tech that creates shortcuts in case we fall prey to the effects of abusing the original tech (i.e. sin).