This is for the normies.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (205)
sorted by:
The left would not embrace Q, because they blame people like him for Jan 6th and people’s families being ripped apart.
The right would not embrace Q, because they see him as a distraction to split the conservative base and a way to make conservatives look like crazy conspiracy-theorists.
The Q supporters would not embrace Q, because they would have suffered the most harm in being literally the only people wrong about Q and having staked their entire reputations on that faith.
The second a troll Q comes forward, he’s ruined from every possible angle.
Yeah all true there but to your first point, since they are blaming Q for Jan 6, wouldn't they try to figure out who it is? And if they believe it was Ron Watkins, why was he not arrested? I guess it makes sense not to come forward, but I don't understand why they aren't going after Q like they have Trump, Bannon, Don Jr etc.
What could they arrest Q for, exactly?
He didn’t call for Jan 6th to occur. He isn’t responsible for the actions of his supporters if he didn’t direct them to take action.
Murderers have been inspired to murder based on Catcher in the Rye, but nobody ever arrested Salinger as a result. Because he didn’t tell them to murder anyone.
It’s not a crime to describe a world which may necessitate an insurrection, only to call for one. And Q never did.
Besides, if they hauled Ron Watkins into court and convicted him as the man behind Q, can I get a show of hands of who would believe it around here? Who here would give up on Q and log off this site for good?
Arresting Q as an internet troll would have no effect on the Q movement, because nobody here would believe Q is anyone other than a team of military operatives or something similar. And since Q committed no crimes, it’d be a waste of time all around.
I agree with everything you are saying. The whole point I'm trying trying to make is they are telling the public that Qanon is the reason behind the "insurrection" yet they are doing nothing to identify Q. If they are going to subpoena Trump, Bannon, AJ, Stone, Don Jr. For inciting their followers to take over the government, you would think they would go after the person or group they originally blamed it on. The normies should find that odd and be questioning it. Obviously, we know they are not going to bring any legitimate attention to it because it would just be digging their own graves.
You said it, though.
“They” aren’t blaming Q. Q committed no crimes, and identifying him as a troll will not chip the paint of this movement because nobody here would believe it.
They’re blaming “QAnon.” Q followers.
All Q did was describe a reality that necessitates action. His followers are (ostensibly) the ones making the choice to act. In court, a troll Q would claim he was just writing fan-fiction or an alternate reality game, just like hundreds of similar Chan posters back in the day.
There is no case against Q. He committed no crimes. He is not leading the Q movement. He never directed anyone to commit crimes. Even if a charge could stick, nobody in the Q movement is likely to accept that a troll was responsible for Q.
Who gains anything from that if Q is a nobody?