Lol ok. Your incredible genius didn’t even notice the drones in the navy video don’t make noise. Those aren’t standard drones powered by blades. I didn’t leak them. I didn’t make the claim that they are unidentified. I didn’t create the claim they were silent and hovered around the ship for hours. The Pentagon did.
You should take this old smart guy shtick to the pentagon and explain to them clearly those are nothing more than DJI drones with some construction paper on them.
I swear dunning kruger just pours off of you in sheets.
Okay. I went back to review the video and your framework claims. The video is only a question mark. There is nothing to indicate really what is going on. Not that nothing is going on, only that there is nothing to indicate what. It is not possible to determine whether the imagery you refer to is a real image or an image artifact (as the narrator mentions). Image artifacts, by the way, don't make noise. That was imagery from a low-light-level or IR camera, so it is a little difficult to translate that into conventional viewing. If they were standard drones, you wouldn't see the rotors anyway. And the Navy did not claim they were their systems.
Let us suppose that is alien technology, which I have no objection to. It simply does not bear up your fantasy that WE have it somewhere and are using it. That is the point that I was rejecting.
You have some idea that I scoff at UFOs? I've been interested in them since George Adamski published his books (sadly, he was a fraud, but very seductive). They first showed up in World War II (Foo Fighters). There is plenty of material out there, as exposed by Major Donald Keyhoe and MUFON. The stuff we've seen lately is only recent, not new. Alien technology is the most credible explanation in my view---but we don't have any of it. Not a particle. That sort of thing would eventually seep out, even among the classified community, if you consider what sort of technology is classified. (Which I do, having held a Top Secret and Compartmented clearances through my career. I was even on track to get a Q clearance from the DoE, but circumstances took a turn otherwise.)
I also have TS/SCI was in the ballistic missile submarine community for two decades. They give them out like candy. As you know, the SCI means we don’t know shit about shit that we don’t have our own hands on, usually.
My position is that coincidences are bullshit. The most logical interpretation of the navy owning patents on triangular spacecraft using unknown next gen propulsion that seems to be silent and also not particularly care about physics, and then the navy having dozens of reported incidents and sightings of these same exact aircraft, is far too much of a coincidence to be a coincidence.
These sightings and odd radar detectors around west coast battleground and capital ships has been happening for decades. They didn’t even see it on radar until they switched to synthetic aperture. Who knows how long it was occurring before that.
As I stated before, when I was in the navy, we did the same exact thing. We have tested new tech against surface ships frequently. Sometimes in coordination. Sometimes not.
It’s so obvious when you look at the big picture, that it seems comical what they are trying to pull off. They even sent their pilot to Rogan to explain how surely all of this must be aliens.
Now we have nasa talking about telling the world some shit about aliens. Because finally the classified experiment and development portion is nearing the end, and soon the world will be exposed to wartime use of drones flying in ways that aren’t considered possible.
It’s the IR strobes that give it all away. Not sure why
they thought no one would notice what is clearly an IFF marker.
Well, I tip my hat to your background, no irony. My SCI experience was different. Also Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information clearance. There is a problem, though, with the idea that the Navy would have been developing classified technology that it was patenting, since patenting is a deliberate measure to put something in the public domain. I once had an invention disclosure squelched because it was deemed to have intruded on classified activity. As you are doubtless aware, the Navy is exceedingly jealous of its privacy and is much less likely than the Air Force (for example) to allow depictions of combat vessel schematics. I will allow they have gotten more relaxed over the past 40 years, having seen cutaway models of the Standard 3 kinetic kill vehicle on display. (That was of interest to me personally, because it was the descendant of a Boeing kkv that derived from a patent I had produced.) In other words, developing in secret what one is making public is a parlor trick that doesn't pass muster.
Coincidences are what they are. Otherwise people would not be struck dead by lightning. I agree that sightings have been going on for a long time (about 70 years) by visual and radar means. Radar sightings have gone on since before phased array technology.
Strobing is not unique to that event. That has been seen in other videos, in circumstances where no one is able to say it is IFF (since they don't seem to know what it is---pretty pathetic IFF if it doesn't work). I'll be content to wait and see. But this is not alien technology; the patent description is loaded down with classic electromagnetism theory (so much so, that the whole point of the derivation was lost in the arm-waving). The NASA EmDrive was attended with similar arm-waving, but didn't produce any result that could be extracted from the noise level. The Russian results are far more robust---and they are making no secret of it. This is why I dismiss any idea that technology this significant would be conducted in secret. You can't do it without the right people, and sometimes the right people are not cleared. Take your pick: accomplish something and let it be known, or keep a secret what you don't accomplish.
Nobody knows what NASA will be selling. Their search for life program is looking for microbes, not Klaatu. I suspect JPL is simply interested in keeping their space probe business line in demand.
Lol ok. Your incredible genius didn’t even notice the drones in the navy video don’t make noise. Those aren’t standard drones powered by blades. I didn’t leak them. I didn’t make the claim that they are unidentified. I didn’t create the claim they were silent and hovered around the ship for hours. The Pentagon did.
You should take this old smart guy shtick to the pentagon and explain to them clearly those are nothing more than DJI drones with some construction paper on them.
I swear dunning kruger just pours off of you in sheets.
Okay. I went back to review the video and your framework claims. The video is only a question mark. There is nothing to indicate really what is going on. Not that nothing is going on, only that there is nothing to indicate what. It is not possible to determine whether the imagery you refer to is a real image or an image artifact (as the narrator mentions). Image artifacts, by the way, don't make noise. That was imagery from a low-light-level or IR camera, so it is a little difficult to translate that into conventional viewing. If they were standard drones, you wouldn't see the rotors anyway. And the Navy did not claim they were their systems.
Let us suppose that is alien technology, which I have no objection to. It simply does not bear up your fantasy that WE have it somewhere and are using it. That is the point that I was rejecting.
You have some idea that I scoff at UFOs? I've been interested in them since George Adamski published his books (sadly, he was a fraud, but very seductive). They first showed up in World War II (Foo Fighters). There is plenty of material out there, as exposed by Major Donald Keyhoe and MUFON. The stuff we've seen lately is only recent, not new. Alien technology is the most credible explanation in my view---but we don't have any of it. Not a particle. That sort of thing would eventually seep out, even among the classified community, if you consider what sort of technology is classified. (Which I do, having held a Top Secret and Compartmented clearances through my career. I was even on track to get a Q clearance from the DoE, but circumstances took a turn otherwise.)
I also have TS/SCI was in the ballistic missile submarine community for two decades. They give them out like candy. As you know, the SCI means we don’t know shit about shit that we don’t have our own hands on, usually.
My position is that coincidences are bullshit. The most logical interpretation of the navy owning patents on triangular spacecraft using unknown next gen propulsion that seems to be silent and also not particularly care about physics, and then the navy having dozens of reported incidents and sightings of these same exact aircraft, is far too much of a coincidence to be a coincidence.
These sightings and odd radar detectors around west coast battleground and capital ships has been happening for decades. They didn’t even see it on radar until they switched to synthetic aperture. Who knows how long it was occurring before that.
As I stated before, when I was in the navy, we did the same exact thing. We have tested new tech against surface ships frequently. Sometimes in coordination. Sometimes not.
It’s so obvious when you look at the big picture, that it seems comical what they are trying to pull off. They even sent their pilot to Rogan to explain how surely all of this must be aliens.
Now we have nasa talking about telling the world some shit about aliens. Because finally the classified experiment and development portion is nearing the end, and soon the world will be exposed to wartime use of drones flying in ways that aren’t considered possible.
It’s the IR strobes that give it all away. Not sure why they thought no one would notice what is clearly an IFF marker.
Well, I tip my hat to your background, no irony. My SCI experience was different. Also Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information clearance. There is a problem, though, with the idea that the Navy would have been developing classified technology that it was patenting, since patenting is a deliberate measure to put something in the public domain. I once had an invention disclosure squelched because it was deemed to have intruded on classified activity. As you are doubtless aware, the Navy is exceedingly jealous of its privacy and is much less likely than the Air Force (for example) to allow depictions of combat vessel schematics. I will allow they have gotten more relaxed over the past 40 years, having seen cutaway models of the Standard 3 kinetic kill vehicle on display. (That was of interest to me personally, because it was the descendant of a Boeing kkv that derived from a patent I had produced.) In other words, developing in secret what one is making public is a parlor trick that doesn't pass muster.
Coincidences are what they are. Otherwise people would not be struck dead by lightning. I agree that sightings have been going on for a long time (about 70 years) by visual and radar means. Radar sightings have gone on since before phased array technology.
Strobing is not unique to that event. That has been seen in other videos, in circumstances where no one is able to say it is IFF (since they don't seem to know what it is---pretty pathetic IFF if it doesn't work). I'll be content to wait and see. But this is not alien technology; the patent description is loaded down with classic electromagnetism theory (so much so, that the whole point of the derivation was lost in the arm-waving). The NASA EmDrive was attended with similar arm-waving, but didn't produce any result that could be extracted from the noise level. The Russian results are far more robust---and they are making no secret of it. This is why I dismiss any idea that technology this significant would be conducted in secret. You can't do it without the right people, and sometimes the right people are not cleared. Take your pick: accomplish something and let it be known, or keep a secret what you don't accomplish.
Nobody knows what NASA will be selling. Their search for life program is looking for microbes, not Klaatu. I suspect JPL is simply interested in keeping their space probe business line in demand.