Going to sticky this up as wether you believe it or not, some good info. Also if you aren’t familiar with Majic, YOU SHOULD BE! His series on the US Law of War Manual should be, should be a requirement to get into this forum. Anyway, check him out listen to this and get up to speed on his other stuff, especially the US Law of War Manual proof series. Thank you all and God bless you all.
It is interesting that this gets stickied/promoted on a Q research board when it contains obvious falsehoods and, moreover, Q is referred to "QAnon".
Who refers to 'Q' as 'QAnon'? There is 'Q' and there is 'QAnon'.
The litmus test is ridiculous. Before this false prophet, there were plenty before him that were promoted (and whom had it all wrong). People just ignored the obvious falsehoods in order to promote their form of hopium.
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'QANON'.3
Media labeling as 'QANON' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
Yea whenever I bring up “Q” it’s blank stares but mention “QAnon” and then I can actually get somewhere with people because they actually know wtf I’m referring to.
I’m not part of some cult that tells me what to say and think. And I’m not a faggot that bitches over semantics.
Going to sticky this up as wether you believe it or not, some good info. Also if you aren’t familiar with Majic, YOU SHOULD BE! His series on the US Law of War Manual should be, should be a requirement to get into this forum. Anyway, check him out listen to this and get up to speed on his other stuff, especially the US Law of War Manual proof series. Thank you all and God bless you all.
It is interesting that this gets stickied/promoted on a Q research board when it contains obvious falsehoods and, moreover, Q is referred to "QAnon".
Who refers to 'Q' as 'QAnon'? There is 'Q' and there is 'QAnon'.
The litmus test is ridiculous. Before this false prophet, there were plenty before him that were promoted (and whom had it all wrong). People just ignored the obvious falsehoods in order to promote their form of hopium.
I refer to Q as QAnon all the time. Am I a shill?
Q Drop 4881:
There is 'Q'. 1 There are 'Anons'. 2 There is no 'QANON'.3
Media labeling as 'QANON' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]? DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS? Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
Interesting that a Q Drop gets downvoted.
Yea whenever I bring up “Q” it’s blank stares but mention “QAnon” and then I can actually get somewhere with people because they actually know wtf I’m referring to.
I’m not part of some cult that tells me what to say and think. And I’m not a faggot that bitches over semantics.
The war manual stuff was good, this on the other hand...
...Stinks!
Keep up the great work Brent!!