His points were legitimate points forming a coherent argument with some logic. Of course one can make a counterargument using logic and citing evidence as well.
Then the audience reading will see a healthy discussion take place and be able to form a more robust opinion and be more able to defend their position in the future.
Seeing someone bring up some valid points and getting drowned out by down votes doesn't have the same effect, at least in the case of this particular comment I was replying to.
because the only people that are going to watch the rally are the people who already know. If he held a press conference, it would get more press coverage especially since itd be on the year anniversary.
These are valid points. A press conference would get the eyes and ears of those who watch the press as a larger subset of population.
The rally won't be covered and is more geared to his supporters.
I disagree somewhat about the press conferences, simply because I'm hesitant to believe they wouldn't just blacklist him from all their controlled DS TV networks, and shame anyone else out of attending any of "Donald Trump's desperate 'press conferences', as the orange buffoon calls them" -- then again, I don't think OANN or Newsmax care what they think.
I think a Trump rally is the perfect environment for him to drop bombshells and say a lot of things that everyone as a whole would want to hear. OANN covered his last few rallies, if I'm not mistaken. I tuned out early of the last two when he got into stump speech mode -- but I get that he's there to rally support for the local running politicians. Between the opening of the rally and when he gets into more stump speech material is not just exciting, but he's made news from things he's said at rallies.
That's a fair point, you shouldn't be down voted for this. Discussion is key to finding truth.
I disagree with his post having been deleted, but downvotes are part of the discussion process.
His points were legitimate points forming a coherent argument with some logic. Of course one can make a counterargument using logic and citing evidence as well.
Then the audience reading will see a healthy discussion take place and be able to form a more robust opinion and be more able to defend their position in the future.
Seeing someone bring up some valid points and getting drowned out by down votes doesn't have the same effect, at least in the case of this particular comment I was replying to.
These are valid points. A press conference would get the eyes and ears of those who watch the press as a larger subset of population.
The rally won't be covered and is more geared to his supporters.
That's a fair view.
All good points.
I disagree somewhat about the press conferences, simply because I'm hesitant to believe they wouldn't just blacklist him from all their controlled DS TV networks, and shame anyone else out of attending any of "Donald Trump's desperate 'press conferences', as the orange buffoon calls them" -- then again, I don't think OANN or Newsmax care what they think.
I think a Trump rally is the perfect environment for him to drop bombshells and say a lot of things that everyone as a whole would want to hear. OANN covered his last few rallies, if I'm not mistaken. I tuned out early of the last two when he got into stump speech mode -- but I get that he's there to rally support for the local running politicians. Between the opening of the rally and when he gets into more stump speech material is not just exciting, but he's made news from things he's said at rallies.