Don't get too excited.

This sort of thing happens in certain Parliamentary governments.

The entire government "resigns" if the commanding party loses majority of the legislative houses and things are thrown back to a legislative-only election processes until a majority party is firmly in charge.

This is to avoid 50-50 splits always cropping up and preventing legislation from passing. Parliaments don't have filibusters and they don't have tie-breakers in the same fashion the US has.

The US is different because it (used to) rejoice in 50-50 splits because it meant no legislation could pass. The filibuster is the spirit of such a political philosophy.

In American politics, nothing happening is a feature and the intent, not an issue. The more stuff ends up changing, the more confused the average person is gonna be, and the more opportunity for someone to abuse people during the confusion.

It's best to keep things exactly as they are as long as possible so people fully begin to understand what is best and worst in the system and change only what is absolutely necessary. If you re-invent the wheel every year, you end up with the "wheel" becoming a literal cube and classified as a progressive "trans-wheel" with dildos glued all over it...

The Founding Fathers knew this and that's why we don't have a Parliament, we have a slow-as-hell grind of a Three-branch Government protected by checks and balances that made sure nothing whimsical and sweeping gets passed without going through one hell of a long trek and vetting to do so.

It's taken 250 years for the Cabal to chip away at the Government our Founding Fathers created.

No other Government in the history of man has ever been as durable.

The 2nd Amendment is probably a big factor in its resilience as well...