Basically everywhere you look, you will only find resources on how men and women are or should be equal, etc.
Obviously this is NOT the case, from a biological perspective we are a sexually dimorphic species and males are larger. Also, watching animals, most of situations show males leading (with very few exceptions and sure enough in those exceptions women ARE larger).
Can you point me to other texts where it was also argued that women are NOT equal to men?
The fallacy here is the unspoken assumption that all men are the same and all women are the same. They're not. Everyone -- male or female -- is unique.
Any way you slice it, though, everyone should be equal under the law.
that literally has nothing to do with my post
Yes, it does. You are trying to make a very generalized argument that women are not equal to men. How do you propose to do this given that, while there are similarities, there are also vast differences between the members in either group? I would suggest that you are attempting to paint with too broad of a brush.
What is your definition of equal?
If divide and conquer is your game…you’re benched.
You’re looking for measurable differences.
“Equal” is a matter of context.
I am specifically looking for past arguments made for men ruling over women.
I believe they were correct.
Let me get this straight. You're saying the man I dearly love, strong as an ox and very good with his hands and ingenuity...and also the man that can't find his keys if he happens to put them 4 inches from the spot he usually keeps them...then asks me to find them should rule over me? Nah, I think we sit side by side in out partnerships and build each other's strengths and the other compensates for their weaknesses.
Don't confuse equality with equity. Men and women have different inherent strengths, as does every human. If we are all given an equal place to starts, how we use our strengths determines our outcome and if we are smart...we find a partner that believes the same.
Well said!
Cuck begone
You literally understood nothing
Asking others, including women, to do your research on how they are unequal to you, who I am assuming is a man, is the ultimate irony.
However, since you are asking specifically about the physical differences and not for intellectual inequities, I will oblige you.
In the human world, it is a fact that men are on average stronger and faster than women. Whoever is claiming that this is not the case is incorrect. Testosterone is the defining factor here as it is responsible for muscle development and bone mass. Healthy young men naturally have an approximate testosterone level of 450-1100 ng./dl. Women, typically have that of 40-70 ng./dl. That’s a ratio of at least 10:1.
A man who suddenly decides to "become a woman" and take testosterone blockers is still not equal to becoming a woman. The male's body has developed under natural amounts of testosterone (10x that of a female's). Suddenly cutting that off does not automatically undo the years of muscle and bone growth under such conditions.
I am literally NOT asking for physical differences, those are obvious and i already mentioned i understand them.
I am asking for former reasoning that argued men should rule over women. They are difficult to find.
What a mystery you have on your hands. Best of luck with your research.
The radish, John glubb, patriarchia
LOL
https://radishmag.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/pump-and-dump/
i don't want degenerate pua idiocy
It's a 30k word essay you muppet. Read the thing and then look at its references.
Stop judging a book by it's cover.
All people should be treated equally and have equal opportunity regardless of any classifications they might fall under.
However, people are not exactly equivalent to one another. Different people have different strengths.
One of the main arguments for men and women being different is the fact that nearly all sports have one category for men and another for women. Why is that?
If you want measurable differences find what a country's average height is for men and women or see what the average age of death is. Are they statistically equal or not?
This sounds like a “Q people are Neanderthals” setup
Sure: Any biology textbook.
No, that isn't snark: it's just fact.
In terms of physical strength or mental abilities and preferences, it's worth pointing out that such things exist in the population statistically, usually on a normal curve. "Men are taller than women" is true but only in the statistical sense; there are a LOT of women who are taller than the average man, for instance.
Show me where female to male athletes are dominating natural born men. That’s what I thought it’s only the other way around…
Tell me your a 42 year old Virgin with out telling me you are a 42 year old Virgin.
Human beings (and all organic life) are so complex in shapes, sizes, colors, function. It's odd that you view them like assembly-line products.
Spoken like a true leftist npc
Lol sure dude, everyone disagrees with you, but your views aren't wrong, it's society that's the problem. Spoken like a true narcissist.