If wikipedia has any legitimacy on this subject, there is no mention of Book of Enoch being revealed in 20th century, but mentions it has been known since the first Bible was compiled, but not included for several reasons.
Wikipedia indeed mentions the Dead Sea Scrolls, which included intact copies of the Book of Enoch and were discovered exactly when I said they were.
What you fail to realize because you obviously know little about this subject is the Roman Catholic Church removed the Book of Enoch from the canon and essentially removed it from mass awareness for over 1000 years, just as they prevented the common folk from reading the Bible in their native languages. It wasn't until the Reformation and the Gutenberg printing presses that the Bible went worldwide.
That's why I said there is no mention of Book of Enoch being revealed ("un-sealed"; clearly known long before) in 20th century (sometimes I wonder about reading comprehension of people on here). Your statement that Book of Enoch was revealed after Roswell appears to be complete nonsense is all I'm pointing out. But I don't want to get in a shouting match here. As long as you don't vote for Democrats, I'm glad to have people like you around :)
Scholars argued the Book of Enoch was illegitimate and it was unavailable for the common people to read until after the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls.
Directly from the shitty Wikipedia-
Various Aramaic fragments found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, as well as Koine Greek and Latin fragments, are proof that the Book of Enoch was known by Jews and early Near Eastern Christians.
And from the same Wiki article linked above, the scholars used to claim the following before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls proved them wrong.
It was no longer possible to claim that the core of the Book of Enoch was composed in the wake of the Maccabean Revolt as a reaction to Hellenization.
In other words, scholars claimed the Book of Enoch was written sometime between 167–141 BC, which would have meant it was a forgery.
Where I wrote "revealed exactly at the time it was needed" in my original post, I could have written something to the effect of "revealed to be legitimate and not a forgery at exactly the time it was needed," but with less clumsy language, of course.
Ok, I see where you got the "revealed" from. But it is only clarification of when/how Book of Enoch was composed, not when the text was available and understood.
If wikipedia has any legitimacy on this subject, there is no mention of Book of Enoch being revealed in 20th century, but mentions it has been known since the first Bible was compiled, but not included for several reasons.
Wikipedia indeed mentions the Dead Sea Scrolls, which included intact copies of the Book of Enoch and were discovered exactly when I said they were.
What you fail to realize because you obviously know little about this subject is the Roman Catholic Church removed the Book of Enoch from the canon and essentially removed it from mass awareness for over 1000 years, just as they prevented the common folk from reading the Bible in their native languages. It wasn't until the Reformation and the Gutenberg printing presses that the Bible went worldwide.
That's why I said there is no mention of Book of Enoch being revealed ("un-sealed"; clearly known long before) in 20th century (sometimes I wonder about reading comprehension of people on here). Your statement that Book of Enoch was revealed after Roswell appears to be complete nonsense is all I'm pointing out. But I don't want to get in a shouting match here. As long as you don't vote for Democrats, I'm glad to have people like you around :)
Scholars argued the Book of Enoch was illegitimate and it was unavailable for the common people to read until after the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls.
Directly from the shitty Wikipedia-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch
And from the same Wiki article linked above, the scholars used to claim the following before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls proved them wrong.
In other words, scholars claimed the Book of Enoch was written sometime between 167–141 BC, which would have meant it was a forgery.
Where I wrote "revealed exactly at the time it was needed" in my original post, I could have written something to the effect of "revealed to be legitimate and not a forgery at exactly the time it was needed," but with less clumsy language, of course.
Ok, I see where you got the "revealed" from. But it is only clarification of when/how Book of Enoch was composed, not when the text was available and understood.