I agree, he sounds like he believes every Hollywood documentary he ever watched. All the buzzwords are there. Very cliched thought. He does seem kind of nice, but his ideas are dangerous. Could be a woman.
Definitions of words are not absolute. I also opened with "I hate it's a sex crime" alluding to the fact that know what the law states. That does not mean the law is correct in its definition. "Sex crime" is an idiom as sex is considered to involve consent and when there's no consent it becomes rape. I feel the definition needs to be spread further apart than what it is and to remove the term "sex crime" from the law and really from our vernacular altogether.
Someone told me that no one can take sex from anyone. It is ours to share with another and it can't be forced. I agree with this perspective and that's where I am coming from.
You are free to disagree with the normalization remark. I am confident that if you researched the implications more in depth instead of taking the intellectually lazy "muh slippery slope" way out, you'd see it's a standard tactic for normalization. It's the same bullshit tactic they use to lump MAGA types in with white supremacists. Well MAGA isn't white supremacy, has nothing to do with it. Pedophilia has nothing to do with sex. Pedos aren't trying to procreate with sex and I think we agree that children cannot consent. Granted the narrative play is a bit more twisted. Instead they're trying to get us anti rape types to come out against this in the same way we wrongfully got our panties in a bunch over gay marriage. They then take the slippery slope fallacy abd say "see they're doing it again against the innocent pedos". Well... If we drop slippery fallacy altogether and just call it what it is, rape, public opinion will not swing in their favor and people are more likely to be against it. "Oh you're for pro pedo normalization? Didn't realize you were into rape."
But I can only share ideas. If you don't agree, well... Just make sure you're specific on what you don't agree with.
I chose not to give specific examples, as I do not wish to argue the fact that the definitions inside your head are wrong, and have been created by you.
Id like to see your reasoning. Im not saying I agree with Camaro but at least he states his reasoning and its well thought out. You are being intellectually lazy.
Based on what objectively?
Your lack of an ability to use words correctly as defined.
You read like a broken artificial intelligence that has learned to communicate using the internet as a guide.
I agree, he sounds like he believes every Hollywood documentary he ever watched. All the buzzwords are there. Very cliched thought. He does seem kind of nice, but his ideas are dangerous. Could be a woman.
And yet you fail to highlight a specific example.
Definitions of words are not absolute. I also opened with "I hate it's a sex crime" alluding to the fact that know what the law states. That does not mean the law is correct in its definition. "Sex crime" is an idiom as sex is considered to involve consent and when there's no consent it becomes rape. I feel the definition needs to be spread further apart than what it is and to remove the term "sex crime" from the law and really from our vernacular altogether.
Someone told me that no one can take sex from anyone. It is ours to share with another and it can't be forced. I agree with this perspective and that's where I am coming from.
You are free to disagree with the normalization remark. I am confident that if you researched the implications more in depth instead of taking the intellectually lazy "muh slippery slope" way out, you'd see it's a standard tactic for normalization. It's the same bullshit tactic they use to lump MAGA types in with white supremacists. Well MAGA isn't white supremacy, has nothing to do with it. Pedophilia has nothing to do with sex. Pedos aren't trying to procreate with sex and I think we agree that children cannot consent. Granted the narrative play is a bit more twisted. Instead they're trying to get us anti rape types to come out against this in the same way we wrongfully got our panties in a bunch over gay marriage. They then take the slippery slope fallacy abd say "see they're doing it again against the innocent pedos". Well... If we drop slippery fallacy altogether and just call it what it is, rape, public opinion will not swing in their favor and people are more likely to be against it. "Oh you're for pro pedo normalization? Didn't realize you were into rape."
But I can only share ideas. If you don't agree, well... Just make sure you're specific on what you don't agree with.
I chose not to give specific examples, as I do not wish to argue the fact that the definitions inside your head are wrong, and have been created by you.
This is how someone with no argument answers.
Id like to see your reasoning. Im not saying I agree with Camaro but at least he states his reasoning and its well thought out. You are being intellectually lazy.