What virus? Is that some sort of cult thing?
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
The popular conception of viruses and vaccines could be upside down. The virus is produced by animals, rather than being an animal. It could have a positive purpose, as an information expression and exchange, selective propagation may mean something useful. An example of a purpose could be behaviour modification, a signal to seek certain nutrition, environment, or a test/exercise of body functions/reactions useful for living-organism attacks, bacterial or amoeba attacks, wound infection resistance ability or something like that.
If a virus is an expression from an animal, then vaccines themselves might hobble the process, effectively weakening the animal particularly over generations, when compared to pure viral transmission.
Not exercising as much means your fitness goes down.
Most bad health situations are not caused by a virus perhaps, but the virus emerges from someone who dealt with a situation (like the exsomes theory) and the virus teaches other animals about this learning. A virus is rarely clearly the primary cause of death in healthy people.
Perhaps they never were worth worrying about, but are a co-evolved communication modality we do not understand.
While it's all somewhat interesting I've yet to see a terrain theory proponent agree to have ebola or hiv injected into themselves.
It sounds ridiculous and you know it, and I'm open to alien hive mind worms controlling people for Satan.
Viruses are integrated into our DNA and are believed to be beneficial. Paleo biologists and virologists spar with each other on this frequently.
It is also believed that bacteriophages came onto the scene during the Cambrian explosion. And that bacteriophages are the ancestors to modern mammilian immune cells.
This is why the USSR and many eastern countries utilized bacteriophages to work or assist our innate immune system.