Being a "chimera" doesn't make it not a virus. This states it is a SARSr-CoV, which is to say, a SARSrelatedcoronavirus.
This states the RNA in SARS-CoV-2 that encodes for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is engineered (lab created) specifically to infect humans. This also states it is a chimera because this lab created spike protein RNA is attached to the rest of a normal bat SARS related coronavirus RNA in place of the endogenous bat spike protein RNA.
That is the definition of a chimera; a whole unit (in this case a whole viral RNA sequence) derived from separate sources.
This is not making a statement of "not a virus." On the contrary, this is stating that by their estimation, this absolutely is a virus, just not a natural virus. Instead, it is an engineered chimeric virus.
This is not news and has been known (or strongly suspected) for a long time. This is just corroboration that DARPA came to the same conclusion a long time ago.
Yes, this is an important point that many people miss. Everyone is not digging into information from "questionable" sources. When DARPA comes out and agrees with what your "questionable" research found it's a great opportunity to present this newly found "validated" information to regular people. You present the DARPA info and also the old information from the "questionable" source. Then you help them connect the two. If "questionable" source was right about this thing, what else might they be right about? This line of thinking leads to a perpetual state of rabbit hole seeking and eventual red pilling without much further effort on your part.
Being a "chimera" doesn't make it not a virus. This states it is a SARSr-CoV, which is to say, a SARS related coronavirus.
This states the RNA in SARS-CoV-2 that encodes for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is engineered (lab created) specifically to infect humans. This also states it is a chimera because this lab created spike protein RNA is attached to the rest of a normal bat SARS related coronavirus RNA in place of the endogenous bat spike protein RNA.
That is the definition of a chimera; a whole unit (in this case a whole viral RNA sequence) derived from separate sources.
This is not making a statement of "not a virus." On the contrary, this is stating that by their estimation, this absolutely is a virus, just not a natural virus. Instead, it is an engineered chimeric virus.
This is not news and has been known (or strongly suspected) for a long time. This is just corroboration that DARPA came to the same conclusion a long time ago.
It may not be "news" to you or me, however, How many normies do you know of that Know this...?
Yes, this is an important point that many people miss. Everyone is not digging into information from "questionable" sources. When DARPA comes out and agrees with what your "questionable" research found it's a great opportunity to present this newly found "validated" information to regular people. You present the DARPA info and also the old information from the "questionable" source. Then you help them connect the two. If "questionable" source was right about this thing, what else might they be right about? This line of thinking leads to a perpetual state of rabbit hole seeking and eventual red pilling without much further effort on your part.
👌
That's a good question. How many normies do i know? :)