Rush RE Lin Wood 11.18.20
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Needing to know whether Lin Wood is a black hat or a white hat is not important at all. I just ignore him as a player. He has no power to do anything one way or the other. His opinion isn't any more important than my neighbor down the street.
I can be agnostic about Lin Wood and it makes no difference. My belief that the elections were stolen have nothing to do with Wood. I am not sure why there is this big divide because of him.
It isn't him they're smearing. It's the truth he speaks and the questions he asks that has them scared.
Hit it on the head u/wannabe. Lin Wood is a side show with no power to effect anything tangible. I read what he says than file it in the drawer marked inconsequential.
I❤️Lin
I love Rush and miss him so much, but he said something similar about Ken Starr, before people set him straight, re: got Epstein a sweet deal
That's nice. Rush is entitled to his opinion. And in Nov of '20, prolly all of this was true, at least, his reputation.
But the point is, Wood's actual actions and statements in the past months have not only done a lot of damage to unity within the Patriot movement, but have ALSO damaged his reputation.
People change.
Is Wood's a DS instrument? Heck, what do I know? I have no idea or intel (or direct evidence) for that. Has he simply gone off the reservation? Lost his way? Gotten too absorbed in his own head? Very likely.
But in the end, the point is not so much WHY his statements have created damage to others or to his reputation. The fact remains that they have.
If further info comes to light, maybe many will see him in a different light. But for now..... Wood is not relevant imo.
Lin Wood is the Roy Moore of deplorable Southern Lawyers.
Roy Moore got our support and then torpedo'ed his own election at the last minute to hand it to a Democrat.
Lin Wood got himself in our good graces to suddenly go rogue attacking General Flynn, Sidney Powell and whatever.
I'm done with Lin Wood. I don't ever want to read anything else about him. I just don't care.
Roy moore didnt do anything. They accused him of dating a 16 year old 40 years ago. The only "torpedoing" was cowardly republicans abandoning their candidate immediately, as always happens when the media sneezes in their direction
No, he torpedoed his own election at the last minute
How
This must have been from before Lin implied 911 was CGI. Sorry but I just can't get past that.
There have been videos showing the planes "flickering" on and off screen. There's a lot of wonky shit with 911.
I agree the official narrative is wonky, but the video footage can be easily explained through over-processing and compression. Jumping to wild conclusions about holograms or CGI only creates new problems.
I'm convinced. Not because lin wood said anything, but because the nose of the plane goes through the building. I saw a video that explained a type of cgi they use for news tickers and stuff and that is basically aligned to the camera lense. So for instance you could have a banner pop up and fill half the screen for 5 seconds and pop back down ( like a sports scoring update or something) The interesting thing about it was the helicopter footage of the plane hitting the wtc was (by accident or by design) exactly splitting the screen in half with the tower. As the plane comes scrolling across and "hits" the tower, the camera drifts, maybe due to the helicopter moving. The amount of drift the tower goes off-center is the exact same amount the nose of the aircraft portrudes through the building. It looks like an airplane-shaped graphic programmed to go to the screen's halfway point, then stop.
There are too many angles of the plane for me to believe this, in addition, holograms can't generate sound, and also can't be fully opaque in broad daylight. You have to remember plenty of eyewitnesses saw the plane live.
Im not saying it was a hologram. I dont know any of the witnesses so for all i know they are just cia employees. I think there was no plane there was a bomb
In order to believe this you have to believe two impossible things.
You can blow up buildings in one of the most populated areas in the US, with the world's heightened attention on those buildings (after the first plane), and hundreds of people who saw and heard the planes just refused to give their testimony about witnessing the plane(s)? Pretending everyone in NYC is CIA is a lame excuse.
The planes are visible in the live broadcast from many different news feeds and amateur videos. This was before the prevalence of cell phone cameras. You would have to believe that the planes were overlayed graphically onto the live broadcasting feeds and seamlessly edited into the amateur footage within the same time span. This was in 2001, and the idea of live camera tracking with graphical overlays was only just being pioneered by Weta Digital for Lord of the Rings, and was still very much in its infancy and only available in draft rendering quality. Weta really improved this tech extensively for the first Avatar film in 2009, and even then, the render quality was only a draft preview. The amount of coordination and rehearsal it would take to sync the plane's collision with the detonation of the explosives, for MULTIPLE video feeds without any obvious errors is staggering.
I come from a background in visual effects. I've probably seen a lot of the same poorly-edited YouTube documentaries you have. Don't be deceived. The hologram/graphic overlay theories are equally ridiculous in my view, and don't add anything significant to the overall 911 conspiracy. The tech just isn't where it would need to be to pull it off convincingly, and still isn't. Focus on building seven and the missing two trillion.
I believe that is partially true. I know planes cant fly through concrete & iron beams !
With sufficient speed, most things can penetrate most things. It's not like buildings are solid objects. I've never understood why people think somehow adding CGI or holograms into the mix is particularly helpful. All it does is create more questions than answers.
No planes hit the WTC
Lots of you guys on this site it seems.
You do you, but as far as holographic/CGI planes, I personally won't go there because it adds a severely disproportionate amount of coordination to an already complex attack, and adds nothing to the overarching narrative.
Not only do those theories discredit our own more plausible ideas about Q and devolution, it's insulting to the New Yorkers that saw it happen live.
Its Hollywood.
Imagine believing you can be offended on behalf of someone else.
Grow up, kid
Not offended so much as embarrassed. We are supposed to be on the same side after all, and "trusting the plan" becomes really difficult when the same people seem to believe this 911 nonsense. It really does hurt our movement in the minds of rational people.
Rational people don't believe the MSM and question everything.
And if you believe the US government wasn't complicit in 9/11, you're an embarrassment to rational thought. The specifics of how it happened really don't matter. The twin towers falling was merely a distraction.
The focus should be on the 3rd building that fell that day and what was inside it, and on the CIA's unaccounted for $2 trillion which was announced by Donald Rumsfeld the day before.
I actually agree with all of that. If the details don't matter, why is there so much focus on the planes not being real? It adds an unnecessary layer of ridiculousness to an already complex conspiracy.
What hurts our movement, is you believing the official story, instead of calling BULLSHIT loud and clear
Jet Fuel cant melt bedrock
https://i.redd.it/nvddn9l5fwbz.jpg
He made similar statements about Sydney powell