my understanding: doctor's establishment is the only body that are onbord en mass. They never questioned: Virus is natural? No therapeutics? PCR test is the right tool? (asymptomatic? common flu disappear?) Infections rate? With 80% asymptomatic or common flu? Deadly protocol? survival rate 99,98? Never found a sample of coronavirus? mask mandate work? Lockdown good? Vaccine passport necessary? Vaccine mandate for all ? Vaccine ingredients not known? Vaccine side effects not related? Vaccine deaths not fully vaxxed? If not enough they discredited all the scientists speaking the truth against them narrative. What a nice community 🐷 I think the court just said: You are the body trying to mandate the vaccine for all, so bc you are the responsable body, you'll try first. I see logic here. Let's wait a little. Good luck doctors
Comments (7)
sorted by:
There was an interesting take on the decision in todays Coffee and Covid newsletter.
“Judges love “baby splitting.” The term refers to that old story about King Solomon where he suggested the solution of cutting a live baby in two to find out who the real mother was. But that’s not what it means in present vernacular. It just means that judges like to give both parties something, to divide the decision somehow, so that nobody’s completely happy but — more importantly — nobody’s completely left high-and-dry and outraged at the judge.”
This is the link to access: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-learn-how-to-get-involved-
Nope, it just has to do with scope.
The case presented to them asked this question:
Healthcare was tacked on to it in order to get a full injunction on all enforceable mandates, which is fine, considering it is an adjacent matter when it comes to the mandates issue.
The Court effed up and didn't fulfill the injunction request. A remedy for that might come next week, seeing how lawyers are already working on it. The Court is likely going to grant it, if only because they shorted us this week and it's easy to argue potential damages with the responsible party being the Court itself for being lazy. For the obvious reasons, the Court doesn't like being held as the responsible party if damages do occur.
Keeping OSHA out of the Medical Industry is a no-brainer. They are for general-industry and workplace safety, not doctors qualified to dictate medical procedures on employees.
What happened is what should have happened. Otherwise, we might be looking at huge power-grabs from agencies that have no right regulating based on medical history.
This case was about Mandate Scope Pertaining to Federal Contracts, not the Ability to Enforce Medical Dictates from the Federal Government, despite the Media spin on it.
The Doctors, Nurses, and even the Hospital System itself must feel more pain until it collapses. Overwhelmed by the very illnesses they have forced upon their patients. Children, infants, expectant young mothers will all succumb. It will not be pretty or easily forgotten and no number of cutesy, Tik-Tok dances will block the pain.
By that logic, the Democrat party should be going first, not doctors.
If they Accept federal funding they Must administer the FDA approved jab- experimental jab is unconstitutional so pure bloods would have a case against being forced to take unapproved jab...?
Because they need to use their power. Fucking the doctors, nurses wil only show SCOTUS sick power. They are power creatures