The fact that you would cite a junk article like that, and not even understand WHY it is a junk article, says a lot.
we generated a SARS-CoV-2 mutant lacking the furin cleavage site
And you have NO IDEA how they did this. They did NOT start with the actual virus. How do I know this? Because ...
replicated with faster kinetics and improved fitness in Vero E6 cells
They did what they ALWAYS DO. They used MONKEY KIDNEY CELLS, and NOT a "virus" itself.
You don't know HOW these fake virologists do their fake "lab experiments," and so you are FOOLED by their fancy language.
They take monkey kidney cells that they CLAIM have the virus in it, then they POISON the monkey kidney cells, then they CLAIM it was the virus that killed the cells.
It is a SCAM. And you fall for it because you REFUSE to do the research necessary to understand what they are REALLY saying and doing.
Loss of the furin site also reduces susceptibility to neutralization in vitro .
That means in a test tube, not in a person or animal.
You also cited ONLY a portion of the actual paper. That means you did not READ the actual paper, which is where you will find HOW they claim they did what they claim they did.
You are very lazy. You not only do not understand what you are reading, but you refuse to learn how to read these papers so you can understand what you are reading.
Good luck to you, but I have no interest in discussing this any further because you are not being intellectually honest.
The fact that you would cite a junk article like that, and not even understand WHY it is a junk article, says a lot.
And you have NO IDEA how they did this. They did NOT start with the actual virus. How do I know this? Because ...
They did what they ALWAYS DO. They used MONKEY KIDNEY CELLS, and NOT a "virus" itself.
You don't know HOW these fake virologists do their fake "lab experiments," and so you are FOOLED by their fancy language.
They take monkey kidney cells that they CLAIM have the virus in it, then they POISON the monkey kidney cells, then they CLAIM it was the virus that killed the cells.
It is a SCAM. And you fall for it because you REFUSE to do the research necessary to understand what they are REALLY saying and doing.
That means in a test tube, not in a person or animal.
You also cited ONLY a portion of the actual paper. That means you did not READ the actual paper, which is where you will find HOW they claim they did what they claim they did.
You are very lazy. You not only do not understand what you are reading, but you refuse to learn how to read these papers so you can understand what you are reading.
Good luck to you, but I have no interest in discussing this any further because you are not being intellectually honest.
It's just a typical paper, the sort of thing I read to understand what's happening.
I'm not going to discuss it anymore either fren, let's just hope it's over soon.