they cannot fire you for non-disclosure. That’s a fact. If they do you have a case. If you tell them your status and they fire you for that, then there’s less of a case. But it’s completely illegal for them to fire you for not disclosing. That is literally the reason they’re trying to get you to disclose the info.
This isn’t correct. Let’s not throw out misinformation, that’s what the deep state fuckers do. If the state is at-will then they can fire OP because they don’t like their shirt color. Unfortunately we (employees) don’t have the protections we should. By not disclosing, OP isn’t meeting the conditions of their employment. The business is the protected one.
Well, as prior management, I disagree with your opinion on the protections. There are goldbrickers and passive=aggressive employees out there that don't deserve protecting, with regard to work product and continued employment. Need a way to remove those people. This is not the forum to hash that out, though. This attempt to enforce a mandate, however, is another situation altogether.
Oh, I totally agree. There are some companies that are so scared of retaliation (lawsuit) that they continue to let POS employees continue working instead of booting them like they should. It’s absolutely annoying.
they cannot fire you for non-disclosure. That’s a fact. If they do you have a case. If you tell them your status and they fire you for that, then there’s less of a case. But it’s completely illegal for them to fire you for not disclosing. That is literally the reason they’re trying to get you to disclose the info.
This isn’t correct. Let’s not throw out misinformation, that’s what the deep state fuckers do. If the state is at-will then they can fire OP because they don’t like their shirt color. Unfortunately we (employees) don’t have the protections we should. By not disclosing, OP isn’t meeting the conditions of their employment. The business is the protected one.
Well, as prior management, I disagree with your opinion on the protections. There are goldbrickers and passive=aggressive employees out there that don't deserve protecting, with regard to work product and continued employment. Need a way to remove those people. This is not the forum to hash that out, though. This attempt to enforce a mandate, however, is another situation altogether.
Oh, I totally agree. There are some companies that are so scared of retaliation (lawsuit) that they continue to let POS employees continue working instead of booting them like they should. It’s absolutely annoying.