they cannot fire you for non-disclosure. That’s a fact. If they do you have a case. If you tell them your status and they fire you for that, then there’s less of a case. But it’s completely illegal for them to fire you for not disclosing. That is literally the reason they’re trying to get you to disclose the info.
This isn’t correct. Let’s not throw out misinformation, that’s what the deep state fuckers do. If the state is at-will then they can fire OP because they don’t like their shirt color. Unfortunately we (employees) don’t have the protections we should. By not disclosing, OP isn’t meeting the conditions of their employment. The business is the protected one.
No, it absolutely is correct. The federal government in leaked documents said the the ENTIRE REASON for the previous vax deadline was to intimidate people into disclosing their vax and religious status.
Your employee cannot compel you to disclose your medical record. Period. Look it up before you speak again.
How about you calm your hostility. Yes, an employer can “compel” you by saying do it or your fired. If they make it a condition of employment then they can can fire you for non-disclosure. I didn’t say I like it or agree with it. A drug test is part of your medical record and they can force you to disclose the results. Sorry you’d rather live with misinformation.
You don’t get it. A drug test is part of a legal employment contract.
Let me say it slow for you:
IT IS AGAINST THE LAW FOR AN EMPLOYER TO FIRE AN EMPLOYEE FOR NOT DISCLOSING PRIVATE HEALTH RECORDS.
And it’s not in the legal quandary like firing someone for their DISCLOSED vax status.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. The entire reason the government told people to submit medical exemptions was to trick them into disclosing both vax and religious status.
Well, as prior management, I disagree with your opinion on the protections. There are goldbrickers and passive=aggressive employees out there that don't deserve protecting, with regard to work product and continued employment. Need a way to remove those people. This is not the forum to hash that out, though. This attempt to enforce a mandate, however, is another situation altogether.
Oh, I totally agree. There are some companies that are so scared of retaliation (lawsuit) that they continue to let POS employees continue working instead of booting them like they should. It’s absolutely annoying.
they cannot fire you for non-disclosure. That’s a fact. If they do you have a case. If you tell them your status and they fire you for that, then there’s less of a case. But it’s completely illegal for them to fire you for not disclosing. That is literally the reason they’re trying to get you to disclose the info.
This isn’t correct. Let’s not throw out misinformation, that’s what the deep state fuckers do. If the state is at-will then they can fire OP because they don’t like their shirt color. Unfortunately we (employees) don’t have the protections we should. By not disclosing, OP isn’t meeting the conditions of their employment. The business is the protected one.
No, it absolutely is correct. The federal government in leaked documents said the the ENTIRE REASON for the previous vax deadline was to intimidate people into disclosing their vax and religious status.
Your employee cannot compel you to disclose your medical record. Period. Look it up before you speak again.
How about you calm your hostility. Yes, an employer can “compel” you by saying do it or your fired. If they make it a condition of employment then they can can fire you for non-disclosure. I didn’t say I like it or agree with it. A drug test is part of your medical record and they can force you to disclose the results. Sorry you’d rather live with misinformation.
You don’t get it. A drug test is part of a legal employment contract.
Let me say it slow for you:
IT IS AGAINST THE LAW FOR AN EMPLOYER TO FIRE AN EMPLOYEE FOR NOT DISCLOSING PRIVATE HEALTH RECORDS.
And it’s not in the legal quandary like firing someone for their DISCLOSED vax status.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. The entire reason the government told people to submit medical exemptions was to trick them into disclosing both vax and religious status.
Well, as prior management, I disagree with your opinion on the protections. There are goldbrickers and passive=aggressive employees out there that don't deserve protecting, with regard to work product and continued employment. Need a way to remove those people. This is not the forum to hash that out, though. This attempt to enforce a mandate, however, is another situation altogether.
Oh, I totally agree. There are some companies that are so scared of retaliation (lawsuit) that they continue to let POS employees continue working instead of booting them like they should. It’s absolutely annoying.