I have to admit you might have something there since look at the data for PA - 8 million vaxxed reported but only 232 deaths? That is laughably wrong. There are more than 232 vax associated deaths in Philly alone.
If anything, this particular claim about Red State vs. Blue State is more likely to show how much extra the Blue States are under-reporting.
Adjacently related, I spent several hours per day (for a few days) digging into just the "bad batch" claims a few weeks ago.
There are a lot of different claims about "bad batches", and a lot of different explanations for the data people are looking into.
It's also apparently a very incomplete database, with something like supposedly 30% of batches not reported correctly (and thus, could change any specific conclusions drawn, depending on how these 30% of batches are distributed).
I've become very sceptical about "bad batch" claims, since looking into it a lot more carefully.
There could be "bad batches", though, I'm not at all sure that it would be as easy to extract that conclusion (from the currently available VAERS data), without taking into account many different factors which effect the data (each analysis seems to only take into account one or a few angles at a time).
I had intended to make a thread post with this analysis, but I hadn't completed all of the analysis, and got busy with other things.
Simpler than that.
Reporting bias.
People in red states being more likely to report their vaxx injuries.
You know what anon... It may be too correct answer
u/undine53, watch this post above ^^^^^
I have to admit you might have something there since look at the data for PA - 8 million vaxxed reported but only 232 deaths? That is laughably wrong. There are more than 232 vax associated deaths in Philly alone.
If anything, this particular claim about Red State vs. Blue State is more likely to show how much extra the Blue States are under-reporting.
Adjacently related, I spent several hours per day (for a few days) digging into just the "bad batch" claims a few weeks ago.
There are a lot of different claims about "bad batches", and a lot of different explanations for the data people are looking into.
It's also apparently a very incomplete database, with something like supposedly 30% of batches not reported correctly (and thus, could change any specific conclusions drawn, depending on how these 30% of batches are distributed).
I've become very sceptical about "bad batch" claims, since looking into it a lot more carefully.
There could be "bad batches", though, I'm not at all sure that it would be as easy to extract that conclusion (from the currently available VAERS data), without taking into account many different factors which effect the data (each analysis seems to only take into account one or a few angles at a time).
I had intended to make a thread post with this analysis, but I hadn't completed all of the analysis, and got busy with other things.
This is my devils advocate position as well - more likely to report as sus compared to kineral states "oh he sadlybwasnt fully vaxed".
However besides that avenue this is a scar y table of data, hope theres a reason to exolain the difference
Could be.
I was just going to say this.