Except that by definition, he didn't engage in pedophilic acts. A 17 year old, is not a child. Have not people you side with, been wrongfully convicted? Or are the opinions of juries and judges supreme over truth?
Or are the opinions of juries and judges supreme over truth?
Of all the judgements I would like to review and figure out, the case of a 56 yearold having sex with his 17 year old will not even make it to that list. Question is, why are you so passionate about this particular case? Do you know something about the guy we are not aware of? Was he fighting the Cabal and got set up? Thats the only possibility I can imagine for someone to get all worked up - unless there is a personal resonance to this.
Don't know him, or anything about him. Don't really care about him. But I do care about the truth and can't stand fake news. Throwing around the charge of pedophile is quite serious. It should be supported by facts. The fact that the girl was 17 and not a child, alone casts doubt on the charge because again, a 17 year old is not a child... we shouldn't have to keep repeating the definition of pedophilia. And then to find out that the guy married her and seemingly they have a healthy family relationship together with their children, clearly this was a far more complex case than the clickbait headline indicated.
What I care about is that we don't stoop to the same tactics as our foes. What I can about is that we do the research, get the facts, and draw rational conclusions instead of just blindly accepting everything we see from "trusted sources" like Don Jr. in this case. We're better than that.
Except that by definition, he didn't engage in pedophilic acts. A 17 year old, is not a child. Have not people you side with, been wrongfully convicted? Or are the opinions of juries and judges supreme over truth?
Of all the judgements I would like to review and figure out, the case of a 56 yearold having sex with his 17 year old will not even make it to that list. Question is, why are you so passionate about this particular case? Do you know something about the guy we are not aware of? Was he fighting the Cabal and got set up? Thats the only possibility I can imagine for someone to get all worked up - unless there is a personal resonance to this.
Don't know him, or anything about him. Don't really care about him. But I do care about the truth and can't stand fake news. Throwing around the charge of pedophile is quite serious. It should be supported by facts. The fact that the girl was 17 and not a child, alone casts doubt on the charge because again, a 17 year old is not a child... we shouldn't have to keep repeating the definition of pedophilia. And then to find out that the guy married her and seemingly they have a healthy family relationship together with their children, clearly this was a far more complex case than the clickbait headline indicated.
What I care about is that we don't stoop to the same tactics as our foes. What I can about is that we do the research, get the facts, and draw rational conclusions instead of just blindly accepting everything we see from "trusted sources" like Don Jr. in this case. We're better than that.