First, this pic is from a million years ago. Second, the makeup is a copy of Alice’s stage makeup. It’s not panda eyes, it’s a “baby Alice Cooper”. Third, Alice is a born again Christian - in his own words
It is from 2010. So not a million years ago, and well within the andrenochrome time frame.
It may be stage makeup, it does not mean it is ok, especially, given the context: panda eyes, white rabbit, money and status, etc.
They may say quite a lot, it does not mean it is what it is. You have to ask yourself whether born again would indeed play with gimmicks such as this.
So, your arguments do not really hold water. Sometimes you have to let go of attachments from the past. Letting go is never easy. But when you think about it, taking in and letting go it simply a life experience. You eat, you need to take a piss and a dump. Difficult to let go? Sperm goes in, kid comes out. It is letting go.
To see kids grow up is letting go. Your grand parents die is letting go. Your parents die is letting go.
Holding on to what is not good for you is usually a difficult topic for those whose spleen-chakra is undefined, because it is an area where the mind feels protection is needed.
Um, no, it's from 1973. It was a photo on the album sleeve of Billion Dollar Babies. Video here. It was photographed by David Bailey.
Again, it's not panda eyes. It's Alice's trademark stage makeup. He's a shock rocker. It was supposed to be scary. If you want to believe it's panda eyes, that's fine. Some people believe the earth is flat, and they're wrong too.
If God has the grace to redeem Saul into Paul, I'm certain He has sufficient grace to redeem Alice Cooper, and I believe He has. Obviously I don't know Alice's heart, only God does. But don't be a Jonah. Don't condemn someone you don't like because you've convinced yourself they are evil and don't deserve redemption. You don't know Alice's heart either. I personally know people in the metal community that have come to know Jesus because of Alice. Pretty good fruit if you ask me.
And seriously, "spleen-chakra"? I don't follow Eastern philosophy or New Age mysticism, I follow Jesus Christ. He is all I need.
You really think that this adrenochrome shit is what 4 years old, since anons began to discuss this due to pizzagate? It' s not even an argument to begin with.
Whatever label you want to put on it, it is the context in total that is important to note. This is not cherry picking. This is as clear cut as it is. And worthy of some questions and answers.
Funny you would mention St. Paul. And I agree with that. Of course you have read Philippians 3:1-14, yes?
We cannot undue the past. What is done is done. That said, certain things from our past are still in the present. And because they are, they are still worthy of questions and answers.
This is not about judging someone. This is about the why. And when it was and still is advertised. the questions remains and so does the answers, irrespective of whether somebody is a staunch Trump supporter AND a born again Christian.
Arguing that because of his current station we can dispense with the questions and answers, especially given the things we are seeing surfacing, we may consider to at least his expert opinion.
The pity of losing credibility with you is not because what I said is wrong or evil.
Let' s consider the Psalms shall we? What does the Psalms tell us about the relationship between Gods activities and our heart, kidneys, and internal organs?
Apart from the mechanistic view of the organs in terms of a filter, or a producer of certain compounds, understanding that we are energetic beings does not degrade your faith in God. Actually, it should improve your reverence for God for the beauty and splendor with which you are made.
Accupucture/ accupressure, tai chi, yoga: there is nothing new Age in that. And just because a group of semi-religious sjw's have appropriated such ideas, does not make it wrong. Because your assertion is based on the premise that this is a new phenomenon. But it is not. It is older than what you consider your holy book: the bible.
Claiming as you do, exactly exemplifies what is going wrong in the discussion of the topic here.
And if you really understood the 8-laws of Nature, you would actually understand Christs message much better.
With this in mind, the loss of my credibility in your eyes, does one thing, and I pity you. For if the darkness, that is in you, is called light by you, how deep must your darkness be?
And what can be expected from someone accustomed to the dark, suddenly confronted with light? Would he recoil, hide his face from the light and squint his eyes closed? Of course he would.
Take your time. It will come to you if you so desire it.
First, this pic is from a million years ago. Second, the makeup is a copy of Alice’s stage makeup. It’s not panda eyes, it’s a “baby Alice Cooper”. Third, Alice is a born again Christian - in his own words
https://tineye.com/search/c14d9f94cccf26127f9957104d850ccebe7f96cb?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
It is from 2010. So not a million years ago, and well within the andrenochrome time frame.
It may be stage makeup, it does not mean it is ok, especially, given the context: panda eyes, white rabbit, money and status, etc.
They may say quite a lot, it does not mean it is what it is. You have to ask yourself whether born again would indeed play with gimmicks such as this.
So, your arguments do not really hold water. Sometimes you have to let go of attachments from the past. Letting go is never easy. But when you think about it, taking in and letting go it simply a life experience. You eat, you need to take a piss and a dump. Difficult to let go? Sperm goes in, kid comes out. It is letting go. To see kids grow up is letting go. Your grand parents die is letting go. Your parents die is letting go.
Holding on to what is not good for you is usually a difficult topic for those whose spleen-chakra is undefined, because it is an area where the mind feels protection is needed.
For more info in this: jovianarchive.org.
Um, no, it's from 1973. It was a photo on the album sleeve of Billion Dollar Babies. Video here. It was photographed by David Bailey.
Again, it's not panda eyes. It's Alice's trademark stage makeup. He's a shock rocker. It was supposed to be scary. If you want to believe it's panda eyes, that's fine. Some people believe the earth is flat, and they're wrong too.
If God has the grace to redeem Saul into Paul, I'm certain He has sufficient grace to redeem Alice Cooper, and I believe He has. Obviously I don't know Alice's heart, only God does. But don't be a Jonah. Don't condemn someone you don't like because you've convinced yourself they are evil and don't deserve redemption. You don't know Alice's heart either. I personally know people in the metal community that have come to know Jesus because of Alice. Pretty good fruit if you ask me.
And seriously, "spleen-chakra"? I don't follow Eastern philosophy or New Age mysticism, I follow Jesus Christ. He is all I need.
O ..... it' s from 73. all is dandy then, yeah?
You really think that this adrenochrome shit is what 4 years old, since anons began to discuss this due to pizzagate? It' s not even an argument to begin with.
Whatever label you want to put on it, it is the context in total that is important to note. This is not cherry picking. This is as clear cut as it is. And worthy of some questions and answers.
Funny you would mention St. Paul. And I agree with that. Of course you have read Philippians 3:1-14, yes?
We cannot undue the past. What is done is done. That said, certain things from our past are still in the present. And because they are, they are still worthy of questions and answers.
This is not about judging someone. This is about the why. And when it was and still is advertised. the questions remains and so does the answers, irrespective of whether somebody is a staunch Trump supporter AND a born again Christian.
Arguing that because of his current station we can dispense with the questions and answers, especially given the things we are seeing surfacing, we may consider to at least his expert opinion.
"Spleen-chakra" is where you lost any credibility. It's nothing but new age trash.
The pity of losing credibility with you is not because what I said is wrong or evil.
Let' s consider the Psalms shall we? What does the Psalms tell us about the relationship between Gods activities and our heart, kidneys, and internal organs?
Apart from the mechanistic view of the organs in terms of a filter, or a producer of certain compounds, understanding that we are energetic beings does not degrade your faith in God. Actually, it should improve your reverence for God for the beauty and splendor with which you are made.
Accupucture/ accupressure, tai chi, yoga: there is nothing new Age in that. And just because a group of semi-religious sjw's have appropriated such ideas, does not make it wrong. Because your assertion is based on the premise that this is a new phenomenon. But it is not. It is older than what you consider your holy book: the bible.
Claiming as you do, exactly exemplifies what is going wrong in the discussion of the topic here.
And if you really understood the 8-laws of Nature, you would actually understand Christs message much better.
With this in mind, the loss of my credibility in your eyes, does one thing, and I pity you. For if the darkness, that is in you, is called light by you, how deep must your darkness be?
And what can be expected from someone accustomed to the dark, suddenly confronted with light? Would he recoil, hide his face from the light and squint his eyes closed? Of course he would.
Take your time. It will come to you if you so desire it.