Fire protection engineer here. That’s not what happened or claimed what happened. The UAlaska study seems valid that the NIST study was wrong, but they only claim that from an engineering calculation standpoint. The buildings were a flawed design and therefore a perfect target for such an attack. They didn’t demo the buildings, but more than likely they were targeted attacks by our own government based on science.
The buildings were a flawed design and therefore a perfect target for such an attack.
Oh, I am aware this was what was claimed in the 911 report. I find these claims like these dubious. No matter what the design flaw is, there are too many variables in an attack by a jetliner. The amount of fuel. The exact point of impact, etc etc. Even if the probability of such an attack succeeding was high, it would not be the basis of planning.
When you look at this from a bigger lens of recently declassified reports that show just how much support the would be attackers got from FBI and CIA, its undeniable that it was at the very least deep state was behind the planning of the attack.
If DS was behind it, they would never let a good tragedy go to waste. They would leverage it in multiple ways. Collecting insurance money, passing patriot act, starting wars - all that is good, but they would never pass on the opportunity to get rid of any evidence they wanted gone at the same time.
So, its very hard to believe the deep state would take chances on a "design flaw" that makes it the "perfect target" for crashing in with a jet liner. Just to be sure they would have setup demo charges.
Fire protection engineer here. That’s not what happened or claimed what happened. The UAlaska study seems valid that the NIST study was wrong, but they only claim that from an engineering calculation standpoint. The buildings were a flawed design and therefore a perfect target for such an attack. They didn’t demo the buildings, but more than likely they were targeted attacks by our own government based on science.
They were demo’d. The smoking gun was high grade thermite dust all over everything, everywhere.
Oh, I am aware this was what was claimed in the 911 report. I find these claims like these dubious. No matter what the design flaw is, there are too many variables in an attack by a jetliner. The amount of fuel. The exact point of impact, etc etc. Even if the probability of such an attack succeeding was high, it would not be the basis of planning.
When you look at this from a bigger lens of recently declassified reports that show just how much support the would be attackers got from FBI and CIA, its undeniable that it was at the very least deep state was behind the planning of the attack.
If DS was behind it, they would never let a good tragedy go to waste. They would leverage it in multiple ways. Collecting insurance money, passing patriot act, starting wars - all that is good, but they would never pass on the opportunity to get rid of any evidence they wanted gone at the same time.
So, its very hard to believe the deep state would take chances on a "design flaw" that makes it the "perfect target" for crashing in with a jet liner. Just to be sure they would have setup demo charges.
Interesting concept I haven’t heard before. I’ll check that study.