The title of the chart states: "...age-standardized case rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccine status." This means the results are "organized" by vaccine status, not that 100,000 cases were tested "per" vaccine status.
age-standardized case rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccine status.
So the rate of cases 100,000 individuals is showing that those that are double-vaccinated are having higher rates of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.
Where is your breakdown that there was an unequal number of double-vaccinated studied in this article than with the rest of the population?
They did not explicitly say this did they? The population of double-vaccinated may be higher than unvaccinated but the population of Scotland is not 100,000 people. Where in the pdf source that I linked to does it say of the 100,000 people studied:
Please see the fine italicized print under the chart. The final sentence reads: "Age-standardised case rates are per 100,000 people per week, standardised to the 2013 European Standard Population (see Appendix 6)".
This means they are testing 100,000 people per week, not per status per week. Nowhere in the document does it reference 400,000 people were tested.
On a second study, I realized I failed to view Table 14 as four separate studies. The way it is set up makes it appear at first view like two studies conducted each week.
I was never so delighted to be proven wrong! Thanks for hanging in there with me.
The title of the chart states: "...age-standardized case rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccine status." This means the results are "organized" by vaccine status, not that 100,000 cases were tested "per" vaccine status.
age-standardized case rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccine status.
So the rate of cases 100,000 individuals is showing that those that are double-vaccinated are having higher rates of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.
Where is your breakdown that there was an unequal number of double-vaccinated studied in this article than with the rest of the population?
They did not explicitly say this did they? The population of double-vaccinated may be higher than unvaccinated but the population of Scotland is not 100,000 people. Where in the pdf source that I linked to does it say of the 100,000 people studied:
X are unvaccinated
X are single dose
X are double vaccinated...
etc
Please see the fine italicized print under the chart. The final sentence reads: "Age-standardised case rates are per 100,000 people per week, standardised to the 2013 European Standard Population (see Appendix 6)".
This means they are testing 100,000 people per week, not per status per week. Nowhere in the document does it reference 400,000 people were tested.
Page 38 of the sourced material
https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11223/22-01-19-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
It was not 100,000 people, much more for each category of "unvaccinated", "1 dose", "2 dose", "3 dose", "4 dose".
Page 40 will show you the graphs from the archived tweet.
By George, I do believe you are right!
On a second study, I realized I failed to view Table 14 as four separate studies. The way it is set up makes it appear at first view like two studies conducted each week.
I was never so delighted to be proven wrong! Thanks for hanging in there with me.